The embolism phenomenon during infra-aortic interventions is frequent and underestimated. The liberated particles consisted primarily of atheromatous plaque elements and thrombus. The reported data might support the application of a protective filter basket in selected subsets of lesions with a riskier embolic profile and whenever declotting procedures are performed.

No abstract

Therapeutic angiogenesis is based on the premise that the development of new blood vessels can be augmented by exogenous administration of the appropriate growth factors. Over the last years, successful preclinical studies and promising results of early clinical trials have created great excitement about the potential of therapeutic angiogenesis for patients with advanced ischemic heart disease. The authors provide an overview of the biology of angiogenesis, the basic characteristics of angiogenic factors, and the different routes of their delivery. They discuss experimental studies in animal models of myocardial ischemia and outline available clinical studies on therapeutic angiogenesis for myocardial ischemia. Related safety issues are also addressed followed by a critical perspective about the future of proangiogenic therapies for ischemic cardiovascular disorders. Despite the established proof of concept and reasonable safety, however, results of the latest trials on therapeutic angiogenesis for myocardial ischemia have provided inconsistent results and the definite means of inducing clinically useful therapeutic angiogenesis remain elusive. More studies are required to gain further insights into the biology of angiogenesis and address pharmacological limitations of current approaches of angiogenic therapy. The authors hope and envisage that in the not-too-distant future, these investigative efforts will lead to important new strategies for treatment of myocardial ischemic syndromes. Means of non-invasive individualized pharmacological therapeutic neovascularization may be the next major advance in the treatment of ischaemic heart disease.

Infrapopliteal DES were associated with significantly lower rates of restenosis, TLR, and amputations and improved wound healing compared to BA and BMS. DES also significantly reduced amputations compared with PCB.

PCBs reduce by more than half the rates of restenosis and TLR in the femoropopliteal artery regardless of stent placement. Biologic effect size may vary according to paclitaxel bioavailability.

There is a lack of consensus regarding which type of antiplatelet agent should be used in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and little is known on the advantages and disadvantages of dual antiplatelet therapy. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing different antiplatelet drugs (Aspirin, Ticlopidine, Clopidogrel, Ticagrelor, Cilostazol, Picotamide and Vorapaxar as monotherapies or in combination with aspirin) in PAD patients (PROSPERO public database; CRD42014010299).We collated evidence from previous relevant meta-analyses and searched online databases. Primary efficacy endpoints were: (1) the composite rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; including vascular deaths, non-fatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke), and (2) the rate of major leg amputations. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of severe bleeding events. Bayesian models were employed for multiple treatment comparisons and risk-stratified hierarchies of comparative efficacy were produced to aid medical decision making. Number-Needed-to-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH) are reported in case of significant results. We analyzed 49 RCTs comprising 34,518 patients with 88,358 person-years of follow-up with placebo as reference treatment. Aspirin, Cilostazol, Vorapaxar and Picotamide were ineffective in reducing MACE. A significant MACE reduction was noted with Ticagrelor plus aspirin (RR: 0.67; 95%CrI: 0.46–0.96, NNT = 66), Clopidogrel (RR: 0.72; 95%CrI: 0.58–0.91, NNT = 80), Ticlopidine (RR: 0.75; 95%CrI: 0.58–0.96, NNT = 87), and Clopidogrel plus aspirin (RR: 0.78; 95%CrI: 0.61–0.99, NNT = 98). Dual antiplatelet therapy with Clopidogrel plus aspirin significantly reduced major amputations following leg revascularization (RR: 0.68; 95%CrI: 0.46–0.99 compared to aspirin, NNT = 94). The risk of severe bleeding was significantly higher with Ticlopidine (RR: 5.03; 95%CrI: 1.23–39.6, NNH = 25), Vorapaxar (RR: 1.80; 95%CrI: 1.22–2.69, NNH = 130), and Clopidogrel plus aspirin (RR: 1.48; 95%CrI: 1.05–2.10, NNH = 215). Clopidogrel monotherapy showed the most favourable benefit-harm profile (79% cumulative rank probability best and 77% cumulative rank probability safest). In conclusion, Clopidogrel should be the indicated antiplatelet agent in PAD patients. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and Clopidogrel can reduce the rate of major leg amputations following revascularization, but carries a slightly higher risk of severe bleeding.

Primary infrapopliteal everolimus-eluting stenting for CLI treatment significantly inhibits restenosis and improves long-term angiographic patency and overall patient event-free survival compared to balloon angioplasty and bailout bare metal stenting.

DES for focal infrapopliteal lesions significantly inhibit vascular restenosis and thereby improve primary patency, decrease repeat procedures, improve wound healing, and prolong overall event-free survival.