This article examines the relationship between some components (i.e. risk assessment, control environment and control activities) of internal control system and the effectiveness of audit program in Jordan. Based on 43 usable questionnaires, the results of the study show that the risk assessment does contribute significantly toward an effective audit program. On the other hand, the results of analysis indicate that control environment and control activities do not contribute significantly toward an effective audit program. These results give an indicator that Jordanian companies lack the necessary experience to deal with the current tools of internal control evaluation. Some applications and recommendations were suggested for both management of companies and external auditors.

The current study examines the extent to which audit committees comply with the requirements of corporate governance in Jordan and describes the current status of internal audit function. In addition, the study examines empirically the relationship between the internal audit quality and the compliance of audit committees with the governance requirements. The results from 49 respondents indicate that audit committees comply with the requirement of corporate governance and no significant difference is found in such compliance due to sector. In addition, the internal audit quality attributes are met among Jordanian companies to a considerable extent. Further, the independence and objectivity dimension of internal audit quality has a positive and significant relationship with the compliance of audit committees with governance requirements. Internal audit competence and due professional care have no significant relationship with audit committees compliance. One important implication of the current study is the development of a scale to measure the compliance level of audit committees with the governance requirements that can be used by both academics and decision-makers in firms.

This study examines the current status of accounting standards among Jordanian firms. In particular, it examines the adoption level of IAS/IFRS. In addition, it examines the implementation process in terms of difficulties and challenges. Further, the study tests empirically the effect of international institutional pressures, local legal enforcement bodies and accounting education level on accounting standards adoption level. The results of the study are based on the descriptive and multiple regression analysis technique. Based on 62 usable responses, the study reveals that the adoption level of IAS/IFRS among Jordanian firms is moderate. For example, IFRS 7 (Financial Instruments: Disclosure) is the most adopted standard. This is followed by IAS 32 (Financial Instruments: Presentation) and IFRS 15 (Revenue from Contracts with Customers) respectively, while IFRS 2 (Share-based Payment) is the least adopted standard. In general, the study reveals that the implementation process of some standards is easy such as IFRS 7 (Financial Instruments: Disclosure), while others such as IAS 36 (Impairment of Assets) and IFRS 13 (Fair Value Measurement) need additional efforts to properly implement. In addition, several challenges were detected, which could prevent the proper implementation of some accounting standards such as the shortage in the governmental and IT supports. Further, the study shows that international institutional pressure and local legal enforcement bodies have a positive and significant relationship with the adoption level of accounting standards, while the effect of accounting education level is insignificant. JACPA should coordinate and collaborate with IASB and the government to offer all the necessary financial, technical and legal support for Jordanian firms to fully adopt and apply accounting standards. Several recommendations were offered for future research to enrich this vital topic in Jordan and other developing countries.