The foliar concentrations of the macronutrients Mg, Ca, K, N, and P and the micronutrients Fe, Mn, B, Cu, Mo, and Zn were measured in field grown Pinus canariensis trees. Plots were chosen all over the range of this species in Tenerife to establish a survey of the nutrient concentrations. Compared to available data from related pine species (P. halepensis, P. pinaster, P. radiata) P. canariensis needles had lower N and P concentrations, higher Ca and Mg, and about equal K concentrations. N/nutrient ratios were in the range considered optimal for pine species. Micronutrients were in the range considered adequate for pines except for low Cu values.
Most environmental stress conditions promote the production of potentially toxic active oxygen species in plant cells. Plants respond with changes in their antioxidant and photoprotective systems. Antioxidants and pigments have been widely used to measure these responses. Because trees are exposed to multiple man-made and natural stresses, their responses are not reflected by changes in single stress markers, but by complex biochemical changes. To evaluate such response patterns, explorative multivariate statistics have been used. In the present study, 12 biochemical variables (chloroplast pigments, state of the xanthophyll cycle, alpha-tocopherol, ascorbate and dehydroascorbate, glutathione and oxidized glutathione) were measured in previous-year needles of field-grown Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws. The trees were sampled in two consecutive years in the San Bernardino Mountains in southern California, where a pollution gradient is overlaid by gradients in natural stresses (drought, altitude). To explore irradiance effects, needle samples were taken directly in the field (sun exposed) and from detached, dark-adapted branches. A principal component analysis on this data set (n = 80) resulted in four components (Components 1-4) that explained 67% of the variance in the original data. Component 1 was positively loaded by concentrations of alpha-tocopherol, total ascorbate and xanthophyll cycle pools, as well as by the proportion of de-epoxides in the xanthophyll cycle. It was negatively loaded by the proportion of dehydroascorbate in the ascorbate pool. Component 2 was negatively loaded by chlorophyll concentrations, and positively loaded by the ratios of lutein and beta-carotene to chlorophyll and by the de-epoxidation state of the xanthophyll cycle. Component 3 was negatively loaded by GSH concentrations and positively loaded by the proportions of GSSG and tocopherol concentrations. Component 4 was positively loaded by neoxanthin and negatively loaded by beta-carotene. The four components could be assigned to the concerted action of the biochemical protection system: high scores on Component 1 represent highly activated antioxidative defense, changes in pigment composition are represented in Components 2 and 4, and the glutathione system, which is important for antioxidant regeneration, is represented in Component 2. Although Component 1 scores were generally higher (indicating activation of antioxidant defense) in light-adapted needles relative to dark-adapted needles, they were also site dependent with increased scores at sites with less pollution, but higher natural stress impacts. High scores of Components 2 and 3 at the highest elevation site, which was only moderately polluted, indicated an increase in photoprotection by pigments and activation of the glutathione system. Significant differences between light- and dark-adapted needles in Components 2 and 3 were only found at the site with the highest pollution. Use of accumulated variables (components) instead of single biochemical variables enabled recognit...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.