Objectives. Assessing late-life anxiety using an instrument with sound psychometric properties including cross-cultural invariance is essential for cross-national aging research and clinical assessment. To date, no cross-national research studies have examined the psychometric properties of the frequently used Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) in depth. ), this study used bifactor modelling to analyze the dimensionality of the GAI. We evaluated the "fitness" of individual items based on the explained common variance for each item across all nations. In addition, a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA) was applied, testing for measurement invariance across the samples.Results. Across samples, the presence of a strong G factor provides support that a general factor is of primary importance, rather than subfactors. That is, the data support a primarily unidimensional representation of the GAI, still acknowledging the presence of multidimensional factors. A GAI score in one of the countries would be directly comparable to a GAI score in any of the other countries tested, perhaps with the exception of Singapore. Discussion.Although several items demonstrated relatively weak common variance with the general factor, the unidimensional structure remained strong even with these items retained.Thus, it is recommended that the GAI be administered using all items.

Background With increasing age, symptoms of depression may increasingly overlap with age-related physical frailty and cognitive decline. We aim to identify late-life-related subtypes of depression based on measures of depressive symptom dimensions, cognitive performance, and physical frailty. Methods A clinical cohort study of 375 depressed older patients with a DSM-IV depressive disorder (acronym NESDO). A latent profile analysis was applied on the three subscales of the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, as well as performance in five cognitive domains and two proxies for physical frailty. For each class, we investigated remission, dropout, and mortality at 2-year follow-up as well as change over time of depressive symptom severity, cognitive performance, and physical frailty. Results A latent profile analysis model with five classes best described the data, yielding two subgroups suffering from pure depression (“mild” and “severe” depression, 55% of all patients) and three subgroups characterized by a specific profile of cognitive and physical frailty features, labeled as “amnestic depression,” “frail-depressed, physically dominated,” and “frail-depressed, cognitively dominated.” The prospective analyses showed that patients in the subgroup of “mild depression” and “amnestic depression” had the highest remission rates, whereas patients in both frail-depressed subgroups had the highest mortality rates. Conclusions Late-life depression can be subtyped by specific combinations of age-related clinical features, which seems to have prospective relevance. Subtyping according to the cognitive profile and physical frailty may be relevant for studies examining underlying disease processes as well as to stratify treatment studies on the effectiveness of antidepressants, psychotherapy, and augmentation with geriatric rehabilitation.

Our findings suggest that the increased risk of dementia associated with depressive symptoms in many previous studies appears to be heterogeneous, that is, it is likely due to different underlying pathways, including a pathway involving depression itself and a pathway in which cognitive and motivational symptoms reflect subjective cognitive complaints, particularly in the absence of depressed mood. These different pathways might warrant a different treatment approach.