Medical sorting is aimed at assessment of disease severity and has to be carried out within a short time to determine the priorities for patient care and transportation to the most appropriate place for future treatment. The goal of this study was to provide an integrative review by analyzing the publications on the most common triage systems worldwide in order to select and implement the most reliable system at emergency departments. We searched for publications relevant to our comparative analysis in evidence-based medicine databases. A total of 1,740 literary sources were identified, of which 42 were selected for analysis. Comparative analysis of different triage systems may help implementing the most efficient system in Kazakhstan. The Emergency Severity Index is considered the most reliable and accurate tool used in international practice, and it could provide a basis for introduction of triage system at emergency departments in Kazakhstan.
Consultation is an important and necessary aspect of patient care in the emergency department. We prospectively examined difficulties during the consultation process between paramedics and providers in emergency departments in Kazakhstan. Methods: The paramedics were interviewed using various platforms and face-to-face meetings. Questionnaires were administered to paramedics to gather feedback on the current consultation process. In our survey, 202 paramedics of ambulance from the cities of Semey, Pavlodar, and Ust-Kamenogorsk, located in the North and East of Kazakhstan took part. Results: Serious barriers to effective consultation were identified during consultations with cardiologists, pediatricians, and traumatologists. Weekends, as well as nighttime, are associated with more consultation difficulties. The most common problems for paramedics are non-attendance of the consultant, refusal of hospitalization by the consultant, and referral to other specialists and departments. More than 40% of the respondents noted the desire to share responsibility for the patient with medical consultants, which indicates uncertainty in their own knowledge due to the limited work experience of the majority of respondents. Conclusion: Barriers that arise during the consultation process of patients with emergency conditions can lead to unfavorable outcomes. Strategies to address these barriers are needed to improve the quality of patient care. This review aims to understand and evaluate the issues that arise during the consultation process.
BACKGROUND: Despite relatively rare occurrence in trauma victims, pelvic fractures have a high risk of mortality and morbidity.
AIM: This study was conducted to study epidemiology of patients with pelvic ring injuries in a level 1 trauma center in Kazakhstan.
METHODS: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study within a single institution. In the period of 2014–2017, we encountered 212 patients with pelvic fractures. About 92% of them had concomitant injures due to a high-energy trauma. Measures were compared using the SPSS 20.0 program.
RESULTS: The mean age was 34.5. Pelvic fractures are more often verified in males. The most common mechanism of injury was road traffic injuries and falls from heights. The highest recovery rates were observed for type B fractures, but mortality was highest for type C fractures. The average length of hospital stay was 18.71 days. Non-surgical treatment was used in 62.3% of patients, external fixation device was imposed as an emergency intervention in 64.2% (n = 136) of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall most patients with pelvic fractures had multiple injuries and the mortality rate was 7.1%. Non-surgical treatment was most commonly used. Type C fractures had significantly fatal outcome.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.