There is growing interest in using multi-terminal Josephson junctions (MTJJs) as a platform to artificially emulate topological phases and to investigate complex superconducting mechanisms such as quartet and multiplet Cooper pairings. Current experimental signatures in MTJJs have led to conflicting interpretations of the salient features. In this work, we report a collaborative experimental and theoretical investigation of graphene-based four-terminal Josephson junctions. We observe resonant features in the differential resistance maps that resemble those ascribed to multiplet Cooper pairings. To understand these features, we model our junctions using a circuit network of coupled two-terminal resistively and capacitively shunted junctions (RCSJs). Under appropriate bias current, the model predicts that supercurrent flow between two terminals in a four-terminal geometry may be represented as a sinusoidal function of a weighted sum of the superconducting phases. We find that the resonant features generated by the RCSJ model are insensitive to the diffusive or ballistic form of the current-phase relation and junction transparency. Our study suggests that differential resistance measurements alone are insufficient to conclusively distinguish resonant Andreev reflection processes from semi-classical circuit-network effects.
The superconducting diode effect (SDE) has attracted growing interest in recent years as it potentially enables dissipationless and directional charge transport for applications in superconducting quantum circuits. Here, we demonstrate a materials-agnostic and magnetic-field-free approach based on fourterminal Josephson junctions (JJs) to engineer a superconducting diode with 1
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.