Acute kidney injury (AKI) as a consequence of ischemia is a common clinical event leading to unacceptably high morbidity and mortality, development of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and transition from pre-existing CKD to end-stage renal disease. Data indicate a close interaction between the many cell types involved in the pathophysiology of ischemic AKI, which has critical implications for the treatment of this condition. Inflammation seems to be the common factor that links the various cell types involved in this process. In this Review, we describe the interactions between these cells and their response to injury following ischemia. We relate these events to patients who are at high risk of AKI, and highlight the characteristics that might predispose these patients to injury. We also discuss how therapy targeting specific cell types can minimize the initial and subsequent injury following ischemia, thereby limiting the extent of acute changes and, hopefully, long-term structural and functional alterations to the kidney.

Histologic analysis of the allograft biopsy specimen is the standard method used to differentiate rejection from other injury in kidney transplants. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a noninvasive test of allograft injury that may enable more frequent, quantitative, and safer assessment of allograft rejection and injury status. To investigate this possibility, we prospectively collected blood specimens at scheduled intervals and at the time of clinically indicated biopsies. In 102 kidney recipients, we measured plasma levels of dd-cfDNA and correlated the levels with allograft rejection status ascertained by histology in 107 biopsy specimens. The dd-cfDNA level discriminated between biopsy specimens showing any rejection (T cell-mediated rejection or antibody-mediated rejection [ABMR]) and controls (no rejection histologically), P,0.001 (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve [AUC], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.61 to 0.86). Positive and negative predictive values for active rejection at a cutoff of 1.0% dd-cfDNA were 61% and 84%, respectively. The AUC for discriminating ABMR from samples without ABMR was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.97). Positive and negative predictive values for ABMR at a cutoff of 1.0% dd-cfDNA were 44% and 96%, respectively. Median dd-cfDNA was 2.9% (ABMR), 1.2% (T cell-mediated types $IB), 0.2% (T cellmediated type IA), and 0.3% in controls (P=0.05 for T cell-mediated rejection types $IB versus controls). Thus, ddcfDNA may be used to assess allograft rejection and injury; dd-cfDNA levels ,1% reflect the absence of active rejection (T cell-mediated type $IB or ABMR) and levels .1% indicate a probability of active rejection.

Altered coagulation and inflammation contribute to the pathogenesis of ischemic renal injury. Thrombomodulin is a necessary factor in the anticoagulant protein C pathway and has inherent anti-inflammatory properties. We studied the effect of soluble thrombomodulin (sTM) in a hypoperfusion model of ischemic kidney injury. To markedly reduce infrarenal aortic blood flow and femoral arterial pressures, we clamped the suprarenal aorta of rats, occluding them 90%, for 60 min. Reversible acute kidney injury (AKI) occurred at 24 h in rats subjected to hypoperfusion. Histologic analysis at 24 h revealed acute tubular necrosis (ATN), and intravital two-photon microscopy showed flow abnormalities in the microvasculature and defects of endothelial permeability. Pretreatment with rat sTM markedly reduced both I-R-induced renal dysfunction and tubular histologic injury scores. sTM also significantly improved microvascular erythrocyte flow rates, reduced microvascular endothelial leukocyte rolling and attachment, and minimized endothelial permeability to infused fluorescence dextrans, assessed by intravital quantitative multiphoton microscopy. Furthermore, sTM administered 2 h after reperfusion protected against ischemia-induced renal dysfunction at 24 h and improved survival. By using an sTM variant, we also determined that the protective effects of sTM were independent of its ability to generate activated protein C. These data suggest that sTM may have therapeutic potential for ischemic AKI.

Background Previous studies have demonstrated that donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) found in circulating blood of transplant recipients may serve as a noninvasive biomarker of allograft rejection. To better interpret the clinical meaning of dd-cfDNA, it is essential to understand the biological variation of this biomarker in stable healthy recipients. This report establishes the biological variation and clinical reference intervals of dd-cfDNA in renal transplant recipients by using an analytically validated assay that has a CV of 6.8%. Methods We sampled venous blood at patient surveillance visits (typically at posttransplant months 1–4, 6, 9, and 12) in a 14-center observational study. Patients with stable renal allograft function spanning ≥3 serial visits were selected. We used AlloSure®, a targeted next-generation sequencing-based approach, to measure dd-cfDNA in the plasma and computed the intraindividual CV (CVI) and interindividual CV (CVG), the index of individuality (II), and reference change value (RCV). Results Of 93 patients, 61% were men, 56% were Caucasian, mean age was 49 years, and 63% were deceased donor kidney recipients. Of 380 blood samples, the dd-cfDNA median value was 0.21% (interquartile range 0.12%–0.39%) and the 97.5th percentile was 1.20%. In 18 patients with an average of 4.1 tests, the CVI was 21%, CVG was 37%, II was 0.57, and RCV was 61%. Conclusions In a renal transplant recipient, a dd-cfDNA level above 1.2% is out of range and potentially abnormal. A serial increase of up to 61% in level of dd-cfDNA in a patient may be attributable to biological variation. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02424227

Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is recommended for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) treatment; however, use in solid organ transplantation (SOT) patients has theoretical safety concerns. This multicenter, retrospective study evaluated FMT safety, effectiveness, and risk factors for failure in SOT patients. Primary cure and overall cure were defined as resolution of diarrhea or negative C difficile stool test after a single FMT or after subsequent FMT(s) ± anti-CDI antibiotics, respectively. Ninety-four SOT patients underwent FMT, 78% for recurrent CDI and 22% for severe or fulminant CDI. FMT-related adverse events (AE) occurred in 22.3% of cases, mainly comprising self-limiting conditions including nausea, abdominal pain, and FMT-related diarrhea. Severe AEs occurred in 3.2% of cases, with no FMT-related bacteremia. After FMT, 25% of patients with underlying inflammatory bowel disease had worsening disease activity, while 14% of cytomegalovirus-seropositive patients had reactivation. At 3 months, primary cure was 58.7%, while overall cure was 91.3%. Predictors of failing a single FMT included inpatient status, severe and fulminant CDI, presence of pseudomembranous colitis, and use of non-CDI antibiotics at the time of FMT. These data suggest FMT is safe in SOT patients. However, repeated FMT(s) or additional antibiotics may be needed to optimize rates of cure with FMT.

Introduction: The scope of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) practices is not well defined. Methods: We surveyed US transplant programs to assess practices, strategies, and barriers to living LDKT during the COVID-19 pandemic. After institutional review board approval, the survey was distributed from 9 May 2020 to 30 May 2020 by e-mail and postings to professional society list-servs. Responses were stratified based on state COVID-19 cumulative incidence levels. Results: Staff at 118 unique centers responded, representing 61% of US living donor recovery programs and 75% of LKDT volume in the prepandemic year. Overall, 66% reported that LDKT surgery was on hold (81% in "high" vs. 49% in "low" COVID-19 cumulative incidence states). A total of 36% reported that evaluation of new donor candidates had paused, 27% reported that evaluations were very much decreased (>0% to <25% typical), and 23% reported that evaluations were moderately decreased (25% to <50% typical). Barriers to LDKT surgery included program concerns for donor (85%) and recipient (75%) safety, patient concerns (56%), elective case restrictions (47%), and hospital administrative restrictions (48%). Programs with higher local COVID-19 cumulative incidence reported more barriers related to staff and resource diversion. Most centers continuing donor evaluations used remote strategies (video, 82%; telephone, 43%). As LDKT resumes, all programs will screen for COVID-19, although timeframe and modalities will vary. Recommendations for presurgical self-quarantine are also variable. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has had broad impacts on LDKT practice. Ongoing research and consensus building are needed to reduce barriers, to guide optimal practices, and to support safe restoration of LDKT across centers.

No abstract

SummaryKidney transplantation can be associated with various complications that vary from vascular complications to urologic disorders to immunologic adverse effects. In evaluating the recipient with graft dysfunction, clinicians can choose among several imaging modalities, including ultrasonography, nuclear medicine studies, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. This review discusses the evaluation of the kidney transplant recipient using these imaging procedures, emphasizing the clinical diagnostic utility and role of each modality. A kidney biopsy is often required as a gold standard for diagnostic purposes. However, because of the inherent risks of a kidney biopsy, noninvasive imaging in diagnosing causes of graft dysfunction is a highly desired tool used and needed by the transplant community. Because the diagnostic accuracy varies depending on the time course and nature of the transplant-related complication, this review also addresses the advantages and limitations of each modality. The recent advances in kidney transplant imaging techniques and their clinical implications are also discussed.