Since its introduction in 1996, the Bispectral Index (BIS) has gained increasing popularity in daily anesthesia practice. However, numerous reports have been appearing in the literature of paradoxical BIS changes and inaccurate readings. The purpose of this review is to assess the utility of BIS monitoring through examining the various published reports of all BIS values not coinciding with a clinically judged sedative-hypnotic state, whether arising from an underlying pathophysiology of electroencephalographic (EEG) cerebral function or because of shortcomings in the performance and design of the BIS monitor. High electromyographic activity and electric device interference could create subtle artifact signal pollution without their necessarily being displayed as artifacts. This would be misinterpreted by the BIS algorithm as EEG activity and assigned a spuriously increased BIS value. Numerous clinical conditions that have a direct effect on EEG cerebral function could also directly influence the BIS value.

A remifentanil-based regimen was more effective in the provision of optimal analgesia-sedation than a standard morphine-based regimen. The remifentanil-based regimen allowed a more rapid emergence from sedation and facilitated earlier extubation.

The presence of an elevated PCT in plasma of not yet dialyzed uremic nonseptic patients indicates that uremia per se and not the dialysis process is the origin of such elevation. PCT levels declined with successive hemodialysis sessions. We propose that in the not yet dialyzed uremic nonseptic patients a baseline PCT level of approx. 1.5 ng/ml should be expected. Although the mean plasma CRP level was elevated, hemodialysis had no significant effect on CRP concentration, making CRP a possible useful marker of sepsis in these patients.

Facial electromyographic activity and neuromuscular block could influence bispectral index (BIS) depth of anesthesia monitoring. In this study we examined, in 30 patients undergoing general surgical procedures, the effect of different stages of neuromuscular block on BIS monitoring and compared the conventional A-2000 BIS trade mark (BIS(3.4)) with the new BIS-XP trade mark (BIS(XP)). At deep surgical anesthesia BIS(3.4) of approximately 40, under a propofol 3.61 microg/mL target-controlled infusion and a 0.15-0.3 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) remifentanil infusion, mivacurium 0.15 mg/kg was administered. The onset of neuromuscular block triggered a brief transient odd divergence in response that manifested as a BIS(3.4) increase from 43 +/- 4 to 49 +/- 7 (P = 0.007) and a BIS(XP) decline from 41 +/- 3 to 35 +/- 3 (P = 0.003) at 1 +/- 0.2 min. Then, 2.5 +/- 1 min after mivacurium administration, both monitors returned to baseline values of 43 +/- 5 and 40 +/- 4, respectively. After that, BIS(3.4) and BIS(XP) did not significantly change during complete neuromuscular block or during various levels of neuromuscular recovery. At all phases, BIS(XP) was significantly lower than BIS(3.4). Our study indicated that the BIS(3.4)/BIS(XP) bias and the wide limits of agreement do not allow values given by the two monitors to be used interchangeably.

PCT exhibited no discriminative power early after ICU admission for prediction of mortality in critically ill patients with severe sepsis, compared with a high predictive power of SOFA score on day 3. However, using PCT could still serve as a useful complementary comparator for prediction of survival outcome using the SOFA score.

SummaryIn a prospective, randomised trial, 75 patients scheduled for routine surgery were randomly allocated to one of three groups to evaluate trauma and postoperative complications after insertion of the Combitube, tracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway. Insertion of the Combitube was associated with a higher incidence of sore throat (48% vs. 16% vs. 12% [p < 0.01]) and dysphagia (68% vs. 12% vs. 8% [p < 0.01]) compared with tracheal intubation or insertion of the laryngeal mask airway, respectively. Hoarseness was significantly less common in both the Combitube and the laryngeal mask groups (both 12%) than in the tracheal tube group (44%; p < 0.01). Haematoma occurred in 36% of the Combitube group compared with 4% in both the laryngeal mask and the tracheal tube groups (p < 0.01). The higher incidence of complications should be considered when using the Combitube.

We have shown that reversal of NMB with sugammadex or neostigmine increased BIS values dependent on the presence of EMG activity. Thus, the effect of muscle activity reappearance during rocuronium NMB reversal spuriously increasing the BIS value should be taken into consideration when relying on BIS monitoring for evaluating propofol/remifentanil recovery.

Compared with the Relaxometer mechanomyograph, the neuromuscular transmission module could equally indicate time to tracheal intubation and full recovery from 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium neuromuscular block. Its small quick-fit sensor has the advantage, in an often crowded and busy operating room, of being incorporated in the AS/3(TM) anesthesia workstation.