Influenza A virus replicates in the respiratory epithelium and induces an inflammatory infiltrate comprised of mononuclear cells and neutrophils. To understand the development of the cell-mediated immune response to influenza and how leukocyte trafficking to sites of inflammation is regulated, we examined the chemokine expression pattern in lung tissue from A/PR/8/34-infected C57BL/6 mice using an RNase protection assay. Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, macrophage inflammatory protein 1alpha (MIP-1alpha), MIP-1beta, MIP-3alpha, regulated on activation, normal T expressed and secreted (RANTES), MIP-2, and interferon-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) mRNA expression was up-regulated between days 5 and 15 after infection, consistent with a role for these chemokines in leukocyte recruitment to the lung. Low levels of expression were detected for the CC chemokine receptors (CCR)2 and CCR5, whereas CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR)3 was significantly up-regulated by day 10 after infection, coinciding with peak inflammatory cell infiltration in the airways. As RANTES, IP-10, and their receptors were up-regulated during influenza virus infection, we investigated leukocyte recruitment and viral clearance in mice deficient in RANTES or CXCR3, the receptor for IP-10. Leukocyte recruitment and viral replication in influenza-infected RANTES knockout(-/-) mice were similar to that in control mice, showing that RANTES is not essential for the immune response to influenza infection. Similarly, leukocyte recruitment and viral replication in CXCR3-/- mice were identical to control mice, except at day 8 postinfection, where fewer lymphocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils were detected in the bronchoalveolar lavage of CXCR3-/- mice. These studies suggest that although the chemokines detected may play a role in regulating leukocyte trafficking to the lung during influenza infection, some may be functionally redundant.

Influenza virus infections induce chemokines and cytokines, which regulate the immune response. The chemokine receptor CCR2 plays an important role in macrophage recruitment and in the development of T1 immunity. In the present study, we addressed the role of CCR2 in influenza A virus infection. CCR2 knockout (؊/؊) mice are protected against influenza A virus infection, despite delayed recruitment of macrophages. We show that low-dose influenza infection of CCR2؊/؊ mice leads to increased neutrophilia between Days 5 and 10 after infection and decreased monocyte/macrophage and CD4 ؉ T cell recruitment to the lungs between Days 5 and 7 after infection. These changes in leukocyte recruitment did not result from or cause increased viral titers or delayed viral clearance. Neutrophilia in the lungs correlated with increased keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC) and/or MIP-2 expression in CCR2؊/؊ mice between Days 5 to 10 after infection, although the kinetics of neutrophil recruitment was not altered. MIP-2 mRNA and protein expression was increased three-to fivefold, and KC protein levels were increased two-to threefold in CCR2؊/؊ compared with CCR2 wild-type mice at Day 5 after infection. This preceded the peak neutrophil influx, which occurred 7 days after infection. In vitro studies confirmed that MIP-2 and KC accounted for neutrophil chemotactic activity in the bronchoalveolar lavage. CCR2 deficiency also resulted in increased MIP-1␣, MIP-1␤, MCP-1, and IFN-inducible protein 10 and decreased RANTES mRNA expression. Furthermore, IL-6 and TNF-␣ cytokine production were elevated after infection. These studies suggest that CCR2 plays a multifactorial role in the development of the immune response to influenza. J. Leukoc. Biol. 81: 793-801; 2007.

The costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86 (B7-1 and B7-2) are upregulated on mature antigen-presenting cells and interact with positive and negative regulators of CD8 T cell function, CD28 and CD152 (CTLA4) respectively. In this study, we examined the role of CD80 and CD86 in the immune response to murine gammaherpesvirus-68 (MHV-68) using CD80/86-/- mice. As we had previously shown that CD28 (the only known activating receptor for CD80 and 86) is not essential for long-term control of MHV-68, we predicted that CD80 and 86 would also be dispensable for an effective response to this virus. However, surprisingly, we observed that CD80/86-/- mice failed to maintain effective long-term control of MHV-68 and showed viral reactivation in the lungs. We did not observe viral reactivation in mice deficient in either CD80 or CD86 alone, indicating that these molecules play overlapping roles in the long-term control of MHV-68. Antiviral antibody responses were dramatically reduced in CD80/86-/- mice, while CD8 T cell expansion and recruitment to the lungs were not significantly affected. The unexpected disparity in the requirement for CD28 and CD80/86 in the response to MHV-68 suggests that CD28 is not the only positive regulatory receptor for CD80/86.

Murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV-68