The study of lateralized visuospatial attention bias in non-clinical samples has revealed a systematic group-level leftward bias (pseudoneglect), possibly as a consequence of right hemisphere (RH) dominance for visuospatial attention. Pseudoneglect appears to be modulated by age, with a reduced or even reversed bias typically present in elderly participants. It has been suggested that this shift in bias may arise due to disproportionate aging of the RH and/or an increase in complementary functional recruitment of the left hemisphere (LH) for visuospatial processing. In this study, we report rightward shifts in subjective midpoint judgment relative to healthy young participants whilst elderly participants performed a computerized version of the landmark task (in which they had to judge whether a transection mark appeared closer to the right or left end of a line) on three different line lengths. This manipulation of stimulus properties led to a similar behavioral pattern in both the young and the elderly: a rightward shift in subjective midpoint with decreasing line length, which even resulted in a systematic rightward bias in elderly participants for the shortest line length (1.98° of visual angle, VA). Overall performance precision for the task was lower in the elderly participants regardless of line length, suggesting reduced landmark task discrimination sensitivity with healthy aging. This rightward shift in the attentional vector with healthy aging is likely to result from a reduction in RH resources/dominance for attentional processing in elderly participants. The significant rightward bias in the elderly for short lines may even suggest a reversal of hemisphere dominance in favor of the LH/right visual field under specific conditions.

No abstract

No abstract

Aims Family intervention (FI) is recommended in national guidance to be offered to all service users accessing an early intervention in psychosis (EIP) team, due to the consistent evidence base in reducing relapse and rehospitalisation rates. However, FI implementation is poor nationally. Although barriers have been identified at the level of staff member and the organisation, there is a paucity of research identifying service user perspectives. Methods A qualitative questionnaire design was used to explore service user perspectives of behavioural family therapy (BFT) within a specialist EIP service in northwest England. Results Most participants contacted reported they lacked knowledge and understanding of BFT, with 54% reporting that this intervention had not been offered to them. This finding was unexpected and is inconsistent with the offer of BFT documentation in their clinical notes. Reasons for accepting BFT included to increase understanding of family members and for them to also be supported. Reasons for declining BFT included a preference for one‐to‐one interventions and not wanting family involved in their care. Conclusions National guidance on FI for psychosis is not reliably being translated to clinical practice, with many participants reporting that they were not offered this intervention. A key factor in accepting or declining an offer of BFT appeared to be whether participants wanted family members to be involved in their care. A lack of understanding of the BFT approach was evident, it is recommended that the offer of FI in psychosis is improved for service users to make an informed decision.

No abstract