This paper begins with a historical description of the processes of deforestation and establishment of forest plantations in Cotacachi, Ecuador. Then, to provide epistemological, geographical and cultural context for the study, the approach, methodology and field sites are detailed. It is argued that native and introduced plantation tree species (Eucalyptus globulus) often serve distinct purposes and, consequently, are valued for different reasons in the studied communities. While many community members recognize the potential ecological risks of monocultures of introduced tree species, they appreciate the trees' accessibility, utility and monetary value. Native trees, in contrast, are perceived to be very important ecologically and to provide economic benefits distinct from those of plantation species, but are also considered less accessible due to diminished quantities and reduced geographic distribution. This case study of perceptions of native and introduced trees demonstrates the difficulties and trade-offs inherent in the pursuit of conservation and development objectives in rural Andean communities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.