Due to technological developments in last decade, new methods of seismic evaluation are in use like simulation based, algorithm based, probabilistic, software based etc. These developments have enabled researchers to move from linear to non-linear methods of analysis. Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) is performance evaluation method where a suite of ground motions applied to structure are further scaled to particular levels of seismic intensity. Seismic fragility curves become significant in estimation of structures risk possibility from the point of view of potential earthquakes and helps in predicting the economic consequences for forthcoming earthquakes. The paper reflects IDA and seismic fragility analysis of ground storey + 7 floor (G + 7) reinforced concrete frame subjected to suite of eleven ground motions. Primary objective was to perform equivalent static and linear-dynamic analysis to meet the National and International codal requirements. Then, pushover analysis is carried out by introducing parametric auto hinges as per ASCE 41-13 tables. To carry out pushover analysis, both geometric and material non-linearity was introduced. Strong ground motions were selected as per suitable criteria of seismic intensity. IDA is then carried out as per SeismoStruct 2022 software and using IDA curves, the fragility analysis was carried out. The results of study found useful for researchers to predict the probability of damage of the structure under earthquakes.
Researchers in the field of concrete technology with the application of different admixtures are always in search of suitable admixtures to improve the workability as well as the strength of any concrete grade. An attempt was made in the present research to use chemical admixtures (superplasticizers) like sulphonated naphthalene based Apple Chemie AC-MENT-ALPHA-X5, polycarboxylic ether based Fosroc Auramix 350, sulphonated naphthalene based Fosroc Conplast SP 430, modified polycarboxylate based Du-bond DUPLAST PC P 2 and modified lignosulphate based Sika PLASTIMENT BV 40 for concrete grades M30 and M40. A literature survey revealed that all identified chemical admixtures are used for 20–25% reduced water content. A study was done to compare M30 and M40 grade concrete in both fresh and hardened states, taking water reduction into account. Experimental results showed that all admixtures demonstrate good paste-up consistency of up to 1%. As the percentage of admixtures increases, there is an increase in surface pores due to more significant air entrainment. Compressive strength results of 1% admixture content for Apple Chemie, Fosroc, and Du-bond were observed to be close to their characteristic compressive strengths for both grades, but Sika and Fosroc Auramix 350 have good compressive strength with less than 1%. As the grade of concrete improves, Conplast's effect reduces, but the Du-bond and Fosroc Auramix 350 perform excellently for split tensile strength. As the grade rises, all admixtures show increasing flexural strength levels. However, Auramix 350, with a 1.5% content for M30 grade, consistently outperforms Sika, which has a 1% content. It helped to employ up to 1% of all admixtures, but Sika reveals a cost increase of 2.5 to 7.3% for 1% and 1.5% admixture additions. The study found that Fosroc Auramix 350 could be used for both grades and still have good workability and strength.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.