a b s t r a c tThe variable displacement oil-hydraulic pumps for the Power Take-Off (PTO) of wave energy converters must work above 80% of maximum displacement in order to have an overall efficiency of approximately 94.5%. This is achieved by controlling their rotational speed when the oil-hydraulic power fluctuates in time. Three speed control strategies have been presented, the first fixing the maximum possible speed in each sea state, the second by slowly varying the pump speed between speed peak values and average ones, and the third by working with highly variable speed reference values. The worst pump efficiency is achieved with the first strategy while the best one with the third strategy. However, the first has less impact than the third one in the pump lifecycle. On the other hand, the second strategy is used to make a trade-off between pump efficiency and lifecycle. However, this paper presents a fourth speed control strategy, which is a hybrid of the second and third strategies. So, the objectives of this paper were to know if these strategies are implementable in a test rig and also on a new PTO concept and determining what modifications should be introduced in these PTO strategies and hardware. This paper also contributes with the application of new methodologies in this field of research for the modelling of pump efficiency and pressure control, such as Neuro-Fuzzy modelling and Fuzzy Logic control systems.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The active control of wave energy converters with oil-hydraulic power takeoff systems presents important demands on the electrical drives attached to their pumps, in particular on the required drive accelerations and rotational speeds. This work analyzes these demands on the drives and designs reliable control approaches for such drives by simulating a wave-to-wire model in a hardware in-theloop simulation test rig. The model is based on a point absorber wave energy converter, being the wave, hydrodynamic and oil-hydraulic part simulated in a computer that sends and receives signals from the real embedded components, such as the drive generator, controller and back-to-back converter. Three different control strategies are developed and tested in this test rig and the results revealed that despite the drive limitations to acceleration levels, well above 1x10 4 rpm/s, these do not significantly affect the power takeoff efficiency, because the required acceleration peaks rarely achieve these values. Moreover this drive is much more economical than an oil-hydraulic and equivalent one that is able to operate at those peaks of acceleration.