Background: Vaccination hesitancy and skepticism among parents hinders progress in achieving full vaccination coverage. Swedish measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine coverage is high however some areas with low vaccination coverage risk outbreaks. This study aimed to explore factors influencing the decision of Somali parents living in the Rinkeby and Tensta districts of Stockholm, Sweden, on whether or not to vaccinate their children with the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine. Method: Participants were 13 mothers of at least one child aged 18 months to 5 years, who were recruited using snowball sampling. In-depth interviews were conducted in Somali and Swedish languages and the data generated was analysed using qualitative content analysis. Both written and verbal informed consent were obtained from participants. Results: Seven of the mothers had not vaccinated their youngest child at the time of the study and decided to postpone the vaccination until their child became older (delayers). The other six mothers had vaccinated their child for MMR at the appointed time (timely vaccinators). The analysis of the data revealed two main themes: (1) barriers to vaccinate on time, included issues surrounding fear of the child not speaking and unpleasant encounters with nurses and (2) facilitating factors to vaccinate on time, included heeding vaccinating parents’ advice, trust in nurses and trust in God. The mothers who had vaccinated their children had a positive impact in influencing other mothers to also vaccinate. Conclusions: Fear, based on the perceived risk that vaccination will lead to autism, among Somali mothers in Tensta and Rinkeby is evident and influenced by the opinions of friends and relatives. Child Healthcare Center nurses are important in the decision-making process regarding acceptance of MMR vaccination. There is a need to address mothers’ concerns regarding vaccine safety while improving the approach of nurses as they address these concerns.

Background and aimMeasles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) coverage is low in an area in the Northern part of Stockholm, Sweden. The overall aim of this study was to explore the perceptions, views, and experiences of child health clinic nurses related to vaccine hesitancy in Rinkeby and Tensta.MethodsThe study focused specifically on hesitancy towards measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination. Eleven in-depth interviews were conducted in Swedish with female nurses who were directly responsible for vaccination programmes. Their thoughts and experiences were sought using probing and question rephrasing techniques. Transcripts of the data were analysed using content analysis.ResultsFour themes emerged, namely hesitancy among Somali parents, lack of confidence in the MMR vaccine, loss of confidence in other vaccines due to mistrust of the MMR vaccine, and complacency regarding vaccination in general.ConclusionThere is a strong influence of fear of vaccine-induced autism among parents in the Somali community in areas of Stockholm, that requires continued attention by the health care providers.

No abstract

Background A tailored intervention about childhood vaccination in Stockholm, Sweden, has focused on different activities with the aim to improve vaccination confidence and in particular Measles, Mumps and Rubella (MMR) vaccination coverage. The intervention included provided peer education focusing on vaccination information, the vaccine-preventable diseases, child development and communication skills in Somali and Swedish language and for the peers to further inform other parents in their communities. Aim This study aims to explore peers’ experiences of the interventions and their role to promote vaccination confidence. Methods This study follows a qualitative methodology with in-depth interviews and the data collection is ongoing. The study participants consist of seven peers who participated in the program. The interviews aimed to explore how the peers used the training in real life. All interviews conducted were tape-recorded and transcribed verbatim in order to facilitate deep content analysis. The analysis followed a content analysis, by first coding the data and then developing categories and emerging themes. Results Preliminary findings show that peers expressed the importance of having a training that equipped them with knowledge and confidence to discuss fact-based information with hesitant parents. The peers shared that after the training they had several opportunities to talk about childhood vaccinations in particular MMR vaccination with other parents. Some peers took an active role in reaching other parents by utilising the film and the cards to facilitate their dialogue. Other also acknowledged that when they could not answer a specific question, they encouraged the parents to address the query with the child health clinic nurses. Conclusions The use of a peer-to-peer concept to increase vaccination confidence provides additional forums for parents to dialogue about their concerns and receive correct vaccination information. Key messages Tailored interventions in close collaboration with communities are crucial for sustainable improvements of vaccination acceptance and coverage. The peer-to-peer concept provides a new arena to reach vaccination hesitant parents and can complement the communication on vaccination from health care provides.