ABSTRACT. The collection efficiency of liquid impingers was studied experimentally as a function of the sampling flow rate with test particles in the bacterial size range. Three impingers were tested: two All-Glass Impingers (AGI-4 and AGI-301, widely used for bioaerosol sampling, and a newly developed slot impinger. The aerosol particles were generated by a Collison nebulizer, and an Aerosizer was used to measure the particle concentrations and size distributions upstream and downstream of each impinger. The effect of the air pressure drop across the impinger on the Aerosizer performance was investigated, and the particle measurement system was modified and calibrated accordingly. While inertial impaction is the dominant particle removal mechanism in impingers, particle bounce and reaerosolization were also found to have significant effects on the impinger collection characteristics. At relatively high flow rates and low levels of collection fluid (corresponding to the collection fluid level after evaporation of most of the liquid during prolonged impingement), the liquid under the impinger jet was observed to be removed by the air pressure and pushed against the container's walls. Particles, such as bacterial or fungal spores, may thus bounce from the bottom of the collection vessel and escape with the effluentair flow or may impact sideways into the liquid that was previously pushed against the walls. It was found that such particle bounce may significantly reduce the collection efficiency of impingers containing a small amount of liquid. When the impingers were operated at a high level of collection fluid and sufficiently high sampling flow rates, it was observed that the bubbles, rising through the liquid, entrained previously collected particles and created new aerosols by bursting at the liquidair surface. Such particle reaerosolization was also found to reduce the impinger collection efficiency.
To study impaction versus impingement for the collection and recovery of viable airborne microorganisms, three new bioaerosol samplers have been designed and built. They differ from each other by the medium onto which the bioaerosol particles are collected (glass, agar, and liquid) but have the same inlet and collection geometries and the same sampling flow rate. The bioaerosol concentrations recorded by three different collection techniques have been compared with each other: impaction onto a glass slide, impaction onto an agar medium, and impingement into a liquid. It was found that the particle collection efficiency of agar slide impaction depends on the concentration of agar in the collection medium and on the sampling time, when samples are collected on a nonmoving agar slide. Impingement into a liquid showed anomalous behavior with respect to the sampling flow rate. Optimal sampling conditions in which all three new samplers exhibit the same overall sampling efficiency for nonbiological particles have been established. Inlet and collection efficiencies of about 100% have been achieved for all three devices at a sampling flow rate of 10 liters/min. The new agar slide impactor and the new impinger were then used to study the biological factors affecting the overall sampling efficiency. Laboratory experiments on the total recovery of a typical environmental microorganism,
Pseudomonas fluorescens
ATCC 13525, showed that both sampling methods, impaction and impingement, provided essentially the same total recovery when relatively nonstressed microorganisms were sampled under optimal sampling conditions. Comparison tests of the newly developed bioaerosol samplers with those commercially available showed that the incorporation of our research findings into the design of the new samplers yields better performance data than data from currently available samplers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.