ClinicalTrials.gov identifier number: NCT00405301.

Purpose.To compare the outcomes of microendoscopic discectomy (MED) versus open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Methods. 80 men and 32 women aged 26 to 57 (mean, 37) years with a single-level disc herniation were randomised to undergo MED (n=55) or open (fenestration/laminotomy) discectomy (n=57). Patients were assessed pre-and post-operatively (at week 6, month 6, and year one). The 2 groups were compared with respect to surgical time, anaesthesia time, duration of hospital stay, intra-operative blood loss, weight of disc material removed, and selfevaluated low back pain and functional outcome (using the Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire). Results. Surgical and anaesthesia times were significantly longer, but blood loss and hospital stay were significantly reduced in patients having MED than open discectomy. The improvement in Microendoscopic versus open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomised study Bhavuk Garg, Upendra Bidre Nagraja, Arvind Jayaswal Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Dr Bhavuk Garg, Department Of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 29, India. E-mail: drbhavukgarg@gmail.com 2011;19(1):30-4 the Oswestry score in both groups was significant at week one, but not at other follow-ups. The complication rate was similar in both groups. One patient with MED had a recurrence of disc herniation after 7 months and was treated with open discectomy. Conclusions. Both methods are equally effective in relieving radicular pain. MED entailed shorter hospital stay, less morbidity, and earlier return to work. Nonetheless, it is a demanding technique and should not be attempted without specific instruction and training. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery

Background:Approach for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis has been controversial. The aim of present study is to compare the clinical, radiological and functional outcome of anterior versus posterior debridement and spinal fixation for the surgical treatment of thoracic and thoracolumbar tuberculosis.Materials and Methods:70 patients with spinal tuberculosis treated surgically between Jan 2001 and Dec 2006 were included in the study. Thirty four patients (group I) with mean age 34.9 years underwent anterior debridement, decompression and instrumentation by anterior transthoracic, transpleural and/or retroperitoneal diaphragm cutting approach. Thirty six patients (group II) with mean age of 33.6 years were operated by posterolateral (extracavitary) decompression and posterior instrumentation. Various parameters like blood loss, surgical time, levels of instrumentation, neurological recovery, and kyphosis improvement were compared. Fusion assessment was done as per Bridwell criteria. Functional outcome was assessed using Prolo scale. Mean followup was 26 months.Results:Mean surgical time in group I was 5 h 10 min versus 4 h 50 min in group II (P>0.05). Average blood loss in group I was 900 ml compared to 1100 ml in group II (P>0.05). In group I, the percentage immediate correction in kyphosis was 52.27% versus 72.80% in group II. Satisfactory bony fusion (grades I and II) was seen in 100% patients in group I versus 97.22% in group II. Three patients in group I needed prolonged immediate postoperative ICU support compared to one in group II. Injury to lung parenchyma was seen in one patient in group I while the anterior procedure had to be abandoned in one case due to pleural adhesions. Functional outcome (Prolo scale) in group II was good in 94.4% patients compared to 88.23% patients in group I.Conclusion:Though the anterior approach is an equally good method for debridement and stabilization, kyphus correction is better with posterior instrumentation and the posterior approach is associated with less morbidity and complications.

The literature shows consensus over high rates of pedicle screw misplacement, but low clinical complications, in the hands of the best of spine surgeons. The concept of acceptable screw placements and the outcome classification makes the pedicle screw assessment results correlate better with the clinical outcome.

Introduction:With the advancement of instrumentation and minimally access techniques in the field of spine surgery, good surgical decompression and instrumentation can be done for tuberculous spondylitis with known advantage of MIS (minimally invasive surgery). The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of the minimally invasive techniques in the surgical treatment of patients with tuberculous spondylodiscitis.Materials and Methods:23 patients (Group A) with a mean age 38.2 years with single-level spondylodiscitis between T4-T11 treated with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) involving anterior debridement and fusion and 15 patients (Group B) with a mean age of 32.5 years who underwent minimally invasive posterior pedicle screw instrumentation and mini open posterolateral debridement and fusion were included in study. The study was conducted from Mar 2003 to Dec 2009 duration. The indication of surgery was progressive neurological deficit and/or instability. The patients were evaluated for blood loss, duration of surgery, VAS scores, improvement in kyphosis, and fusion status. Improvement in neurology was documented and functional outcome was judged by oswestry disability index (ODI).Results:The mean blood loss in Group A (VATS category) was 780 ml (330-1180 ml) and the operative time averaged was 228 min (102-330 min). The average preoperative kyphosis in Group A was 38° which was corrected to 30°. Twenty-two patients who underwent VATS had good fusion (Grade I and Grade II) with failure of fusion in one. Complications occurred in seven patients who underwent VATS. The mean blood loss was 625 ml (350-800 ml) with an average duration of surgery of 255 min (180-345 min) in the percutaneous posterior instrumentation group (Group B). The average preoperative segmental (kyphosis) Cobb's angle of three patients with thoracic TB in Group B was 41.25° (28-48°), improved to 14.5°(11°- 21°) in the immediate postoperative period (71.8% correction). The average preoperative segmental kyphosis in another 12 patients in Group B with lumbar tuberculosis of 20.25° improved to –12.08° of lordosis with 32.33° average correction of deformity. Good fusion (Grade I and Grade II) was achieved in 14 patients and Grade III fusion in 1 patient in Group B. One patient suffered with pseudoarthrosis/doubtful fusion with screw loosening in the percutaneous group.Conclusion:Good fusion rate with encouraging functional results can be obtained in caries spine with minimally invasive techniques with all the major advantages of a minimally invasive procedures including reduction in approach-related morbidity.

In the absence of major deformity, the major goal of surgery in tuberculous spondylitis is to achieve adequate cord decompression and débridement of diseased tissue. We asked whether video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) could be undertaken in active tuberculosis of the spine with instrumentation and achieve good healing of the disease with fusion and with adequate decompression of the cord to achieve neural recovery. We retrospectively reviewed 23 patients (13 men and 10 women with an average age of 38.2 years) with single-level thoracic spinal tuberculosis (T4-T11) treated with VATS. Of the 23 patients, 18 had paraparesis/paraplegia. The procedures included: (1) débridement and drainage of prevertebral and paravertebral abscess (n = 4); (2) débridement, decompression, and reconstruction with rib graft (n = 8); (3) débridement, decompression, anterior vertical titanium mesh cage, and open posterior screw-rod fixation (n = 5); and (4) débridement, decompression, and anterior screw-rod fixation (n = 6). Twenty-two of 23 patients achieved fusion and there was no recurrence of the disease in any of the patients. No patient had neurological deterioration and 17 of the 18 neurologically compromised patients regained ambulatory power. Small scars (for surgical portals), early mobilization, and short hospital stays were the salient advantages.

Study Design: A literature review.Objective: To summarize the implant removal rate, common bacterial organisms found, time of onset, ratio of superficial to deep infection, and regurgitating the prevalence among all the retrospective and prospective studies on management and characterization of surgical site infections (SSIs). Methods:PubMed was searched for articles published between 2000 and 2018 on the management or characterization of SSIs after spinal surgery. Only prospective and retrospective studies were included. Results: A total of 49 articles were found relevant to the objective. These studies highlighted the importance of implant removal to avoid recurrence of SSI. The common organisms detected were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermis, Staphylococcus epidermis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Propionibacterium acnes, with prevalence of 1% to 15%. A major proportion of all were deep SSI, with minority reporting on late-onset SSI. Conclusion: Long-term antibiotics administration, and continuous irrigation and debridement were common suggestion among the authors; however, the key measure undertaken or implied by most authors to avoid risk of recurrence was removal or replacement of implants for late-onset SSI.

Restoration of sagittal contour along with height restoration could guide the clinical practice, for the given range of distraction force.