The large and variable hepatic extraction of insulin is a major obstacle to our ability to quantitate insulin secretion accurately in human subjects. The evidence that C-peptide is secreted from the beta cell in equimolar concentration with insulin, but not extracted by the liver to any significant degree, has provided a firm scientific basis for the use of peripheral C-peptide concentrations as a semiquantitative marker of beta cell secretory activity in a variety of clinical situations. Thus, plasma C-peptide has proved to be extremely valuable in the study of the natural history of type 1 diabetes, to monitor insulin secretion in patients with insulin antibodies, and as an adjunct in the investigation of patients with hypoglycemic disorders. The use of the peripheral C-peptide concentration to accurately quantitate the rate of insulin secretion is more controversial. This is mainly because understanding of the kinetics and metabolism of C-peptide under different conditions is incomplete. Unfortunately, sufficient quantities of human C-peptide are not available to allow the experimental validation of the mathematical formulae that have been proposed for the calculation of insulin secretion from peripheral C-peptide concentrations. Until it is possible to perform such experiments, the accuracy of studies that have derived insulin secretion rates from peripheral C-peptide levels will remain uncertain. The assumption that the peripheral C-peptide:insulin molar ratio can be used as a reflection of hepatic insulin extraction has not been experimentally validated. The marked difference in the plasma half-lives of insulin and C-peptide complicates the interpretation of changes in their ratios.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Serum levels of free and total insulin as well as total C-peptide immunoreactivity (C-peptide and proinsulin) and C- peptide were measured in insulin-treated diabetics with circulating insulin antibodies by the addition of polyethylene glycol (PEG) before and after acidification. PEG resulted in complete precipitation of insulin antibodies from serum and made it possible to measure free insulin in the supernatant. Incubation of serum at 37 degrees C. for two hours before addition of PEG resulted in values for free insulin that probably resembled the in-vivo levels most closely. The same method could also be used to remove proinsulin bound to circulating insulin antibodies and permitted the measurement of C-peptide in the supernatant. Clinical studies using this approach indicate that combined measurements of serum free and total insulin and C-peptide provide information that is helpful in understanding the contribution of endogenous and exogenous insulin to the course and metabolic control of insulin-requiring diabetic patients.
The plasma C-peptide immunoreactivity (CPR) in 10 normal subjects varied considerably when measured with different antisera in parallel assays. The CPR level correlated with the blank "CPR" value measured in plasma devoid of C-peptide and to a lesser degree with the sensitivity of the standard curves obtained with the individual antisera. Storage of plasma samples at different temperatures and for different lengths of time before the analyses were carried out resulted in further variation in the CPR results. This was caused by a time- and temperature-dependent fall in CPR, which was more pronounced with some antisera than with others. This sensitivity to storage of plasma did not correlate with the antigenic characteristics of the antisera as determined by their reactivity with 11 specific fragments of the C-peptide molecule. The contribution of human proinsulin to the CPR concentration relative in normal subjects was considered to be negligible even though the relative immunoreactivity of human proinsulin and C-peptide ranged from 11 to 143 per cent among these antisera. These results suggest that differences in C-peptide antisera are a major reason for the variation in the concentration of circulating CPR as measured in different C-peptide immunoassays.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.