Personalization and context-awareness are highly important topics in research on Intelligent Information Systems. In the fields of Music Information Retrieval (MIR) and Music Recommendation in particular, user-centric algorithms should ideally provide music that perfectly fits each individual listener in each imaginable situation and for each of her information or entertainment needs. Even though preliminary steps towards such systems have recently been presented at the "International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference" (ISMIR) and at similar venues, this vision is still far away from becoming a reality. In this article, we investigate and discuss literature on the topic of user-centric music retrieval and reflect on why the breakthrough in this field has not been achieved yet. Given the different expertises of the authors, we shed light on why this topic is a particularly challenging one, taking computer science and psychology points of view. Whereas the computer science aspect centers on the problems of user modeling, machine learning,

No abstract

One of the central goals of Music Information Retrieval (MIR) is the quantification of similarity between or within pieces of music. These quantitative relations should mirror the human perception of music similarity, which is however highly subjective with low inter-rater agreement. Unfortunately this principal problem has been given little attention in MIR so far. Since it is not meaningful to have computational models that go beyond the level of human agreement, these levels of inter-rater agreement present a natural upper bound for any algorithmic approach. We will illustrate this fundamental problem in the evaluation of MIR systems using results from two typical application scenarios: (i) modelling of music similarity between pieces of music; (ii) music structure analysis within pieces of music. For both applications, we derive upper bounds of performance which are due to the limited inter-rater agreement. We compare these upper bounds to the performance of state-of-the-art MIR systems and show how the upper bounds prevent further progress in developing better MIR systems.

No abstract

We show that the number of output units used in a selforganizing map (SOM) influences its applicability for either clustering or visualization. By reviewing the appropriate literature and theory and own empirical results, we demonstrate that SOMs can be used for clustering or visualization separately, for simultaneous clustering and visualization, and even for clustering via visualization. For all these different kinds of application, SOM is compared to other statistical approaches. This will show SOM to be a flexible tool which can be used for various forms of explorative data analysis but it will also be made obvious that this flexibility comes with a price in terms of impaired performance. The usage of SOM in the data mining community is covered by discussing its application in the data mining tools CLEMENTINE and WEBSOM.

No abstract

No abstract

The hubness phenomenon is a recently discovered aspect of the curse of dimensionality. Hub objects have a small distance to an exceptionally large number of data points while anti-hubs lie far from all other data points. A closely related problem is the concentration of distances in high-dimensional spaces. Previous work has already advocated the use of fractional ℓp norms instead of the ubiquitous Euclidean norm to avoid the negative effects of distance concentration. However, which exact fractional norm to use is a largely unsolved problem. The contribution of this work is an empirical analysis of the relation of different ℓp norms and hubness. We propose an unsupervised approach for choosing an ℓp norm which minimizes hubs while simultaneously maximizing nearest neighbor classification. Our approach is evaluated on seven high-dimensional data sets and compared to three approaches that re-scale distances to avoid hubness.