Aims-To determine whether mitral annular calcification and aortic valve calcification, with or without stenosis, are expressions of atherosclerotic disease. Methods-The

Background and PurposeWe wanted to establish independent associations of various clinical variables, computed tomographic (CT) scan features, presenting stroke subtypes, and outcome with the presence of silent infarcts on CT.Methods We studied 755 consecutive patients in a prospective registration of patients with first-ever supratentorial atherothrombotic, cardioembolic, or lacunar stroke or stroke of undetermined cause by multiple logistic regression analysis.Results Two hundred six patients (27%) with a first symptomatic territorial or small deep ischemic stroke had one or more silent infarcts on CT. Of all silent lesions, 169 (82%) were small and deep. Silent infarcts were significantly more strongly associated with a lacunar than atherothrombotic (odds ratio [OR], 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 2.47; P=.O39) or cardioembolic (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.99; P=.OO5) index stroke. Silent territorial lesions were more strongly associated with cardioembolic than with lacunar stroke but not with atherothrombotic stroke. In this respect, no differences were found between the atherothrombotic and undetermined-cause group. Advanced age and hypertension were the only risk factors that were significantly associated with silent infarcts (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.71; P=.0U; and OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.21; P=.001; respectively), mainly because of a strong independent association of these risk factors with silent small deep infarcts (OR, 1.75; 95% CI,

All studies but one in the past have shown a strong relative risk of mitral annulus calcification for stroke, but the contribution of associated cardiac and vascular risk factors, especially carotid atheroma has not been appreciated. We studied the risk of stroke in selected patients with mitral annular calcification, adjusting for clinical, echocardiographic and therapeutic factors influencing stroke risk. Of 8,160 consecutive patients with echocardiograms, 657 with and 562 without mitral annulus calcification were followed for a mean of 2.4 years (range 1-6.6) to determine stroke risk by means of proportional hazards models with clinical, echocardiographic, and therapeutic variables that influence the risk of stroke. We also determined the association of mitral annulus calcification with subtypes of ischaemic brain lesions generally considered to be specific for an underlying cardioembolic cause. We therefore distinguished between territorial, small deep, and asymptomatic (silent) brain infarcts. Fifty-one patients with mitral annulus calcification and 27 controls had a stroke in the follow-up period. Mitral annulus calcification was not significantly associated with stroke in proportional hazards models (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.42-1.36, P = 0.3), or with any of the stroke subtypes, or with the presence of silent brain infarcts after adjustments for risk factors for generalized vascular disease Hypertension and carotid atheroma, with or without stenosis, ipsilateral or contralateral to the side of the stroke, were significantly associated with stroke in our patients. This study does not support the view that mitral annulus calcification is a risk factor for stroke. As others have found strong associations between mitral annulus calcification and cardiac and vascular risk factors for stroke, the increased risk of stroke in patients with mitral annulus calcification reported may be explained by these confounding risk factors. Therefore, in our opinion, mitral annulus calcification requires treatment of cardiovascular risk factors, but generally no specific measures such as surgery or oral anticoagulants are required to lower the risk of stroke.

Aortic valve calcification with or without stenosis is not a risk factor for stroke.

BackgroundLumbosacral transitional vertebra can result in an anomalous number of lumbar vertebrae associated with wrong level treatment. The primary aim of this study was to characterize discrepancies between reported referring levels and levels from MRI reports with treated levels. The secondary aim was to analyze interobserver variability between a pain physician and a radiologist when determining levels and classifying lumbosacral transitional vertebrae.MethodsBetween February 2016 and October 2019, a retrospective case series of prospectively collected data of the affected levels mentioned in referrals, MRI reports and treated levels was performed. The counting process, level determination, classification of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and a secondary control were carried out by independent researchers using a standard methodology.ResultsOf the 2443 referrals, 143 patients had an anomalous number of lumbar vertebrae; of these, 114 were included for analysis. The vertebral level noted in the patient’s file, in the referral, and the reported level of treatment differed in 40% of these cases. The vertebral level between the MRI reports and treatment differed in 46% of cases. The interobserver reliability (radiologist vs pain physician) for classifying a transitional vertebra was fair ((κ=0.40) and was substantial (κ=0.70) when counting the vertebrae.ConclusionIn the presence of lumbar spine anomalies, we report a high prevalence of discrepancies between referral levels and MRI pathological findings with treatment levels. Further research is needed to better understand clinical implications.

No abstract

No abstract