Департамент научно-технологической политики и образования Федеральное государственное бюджетное научное учреждение «Российский научно-исследовательский институт информации и технико-экономических исследований по инженерно-техническому обеспечению агропромышленного комплекса» (ФГБНУ «Росинформагротех») ПРОСПЕКТ УСЛУГ ФГБНУ «РОСИНФОРМАГРОТЕХ» НАУЧНО-ИНФОРМАЦИОННОЕ ОБЕСПЕЧЕНИЕ ИННОВАЦИОННОГО РАЗВИТИЯ В СФЕРЕ СЕЛЬСКОГО ХОЗЯЙСТВА 2019 Уважаемые коллеги! Более 50 лет ФГБНУ «Росинформагротех» выполняет работы по научно-информационному обеспечению инновационного развития в сфере сельского хозяйства с учетом положений Государственной программы развития сельского хозяйства и регулирования рынков сельскохозяйственной продукции, сырья и продовольствия на 2013-2020 годы, Федеральной научно-технической программы (ФНТП) развития сельского хозяйства на 2017-2025 годы. Исследования направлены на увеличение производства основных видов сельскохозяйственной продукции и пищевых продуктов, импортозамещение, повышение экспортного потенциала, использование наилучших доступных технологий (НДТ), поддержку малых форм хозяйствования, стимулирование инновационной деятельности, развитие биотехнологий, обеспечение села высокотехнологичными машинами, внедрение в производство инновационных технологий. Институт формирует информационные ресурсы, совершенствует информационные технологии и сервисы, проводит техникоэкономические исследования и информационный мониторинг инновационного развития АПК России, что содействует научнотехнологическому развитию отрасли. Результатом деятельности института являются научные издания, справочники, брошюры, аналитические материалы и др. научнометодические материалы, периодические издания: Информационный бюллетень Министерства сельского хозяйства Российской Федерации, информационно-аналитический журнал «Техника и оборудование для села». Пользователями информации являются Минсельхоз России, органы управления субъектов Российской Федерации, РАН, научно-исследовательские институты, высшие учебные заведения, информационно-консультационные службы, ассоциации, предприятия и организации АПК и др. Учреждение профессионально использует полиграфическое производство, внедряя цифровые технологии печати, что позволяет создать конкурентоспособную продукцию, повысить эффективность производства, обеспечить ученых и специалистов необходимой информацией. Мы открыты к сотрудничеству и уверены, что создать конкурентоспособную продукцию, повысить эффективность производства, найти партнеров и инвесторов в различных экономических условиях можно только владея информацией. Используя наш интеллектуальный потенциал, информационные ресурсы и издательско-полиграфическую базу института, Вы добьетесь новых успехов. Приглашаем к сотрудничеству! Передовые практики в отечественном племенном животноводстве (научный аналитический обзор). Проанализированы состояние подотраслей племенного животноводства, причины его неконкурентоспособности. Рассмотрены перспективные методы селекции, применяемые в племенном молочном и мясном скотоводстве, свиноводстве, ов...
Publications of the IAEA, ICRP, the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of October 13, 2018 No. 585 “On the Approval of the Basic Principles of State Policy of the Russian Federation in the Field of Nuclear and Radiation Safety until 2025 and beyond” emphasize the increasing role of public in decision-making in the use of ionizing radiation. Sociological research is a part of the preparatory stage in the organization of interaction with stakeholders. During that stage, the participants in the information interaction (stakeholders) have an opportunity to study each other’s attitudes, so that the interaction is as constructive as possible. Sociological studies allow to determine the positions of stakeholders on the subject of risk communication at the initial stage of the process, in the implementation of decisions and in assessing the effectiveness of risk communication. The basis of the sociological study is the program. In forming a sociological research program, it is necessary to pre-identify important factors that can influence the attitude to a particular management decision of different stakeholders. The main purpose of the sociological research is to study the range of opinions and features of perception of the planned management decision by various participants in the process of risk communication. In assessing sociological research, one of the main tasks is to determine the nature of possible contradictions in the positions of the stakeholders, which largely determines the willingness of the interested parties to dialogue. In the consensus risk communication, the results of sociological research are useful in the formation of three sections of information materials: general information about the event, benefit assessment, and threat assessment.
The aim of the current study was to perform a comparative assessment of the radiation and non-radiation health risks for the sample of transgenders as well as the assessment of their perception of these risks. The study was performed on the sample of patients, undergoing the gender reassignment surgery from female to male. The structure of surgical procedures and the corresponding X-ray examinations was analyzed with the subsequent assessment of the radiation and non-radiation health risks. The level of patient knowledge on the risks and benefits of the medical procedures and perception of the ratio of radiation and non-radiation risks were evaluated based on the results of the sociological study. The study included the patients that underwent gender reassignment surgery in August 2012 – February 2018 on the base of I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University. Data collection and questioning were performed in August 2019 – March 2020. Data on the structure of the surgical procedures and X-ray examinations was collected for 99 patients; 86 patients agreed to participate in the questioning. The results indicate that the selected sample of patients, undergoing the gender reassignment surgery from female to male, is a high risk group both for radiation and non-radiation factors. For the whole multi-stage gender reassignment surgery, a patient could receive a total effective dose up to 250 mSv due to repeated computed tomography scans of chest, abdomen and head with contrast, corresponding to the lifetime attributive radiation risk of up to 1×10-2. Comparison of radiation and non-radiation risks for that patient sample indicates the dominance of the risk of successful suicide attempts (5×10-2). Radiation risks are equal to or even exceed (for the final stages of the gender reassignment surgery) the other risks of mortality from the non-radiation factors (anesthesia – 5,4×10-5, thrombosis – 2×10-5, post-surgical complications – 6×10-2). The reduction of suicide risks, as a result of the treatment, outweighs all other risk factors and justifies the gender reassignment surgery. The results of a sociological study show a decrease from 77% to 23% of suicidal thoughts among the patients. The study indicates that risk-communication was performed on the unsatisfactory level: less than 40% of the patients were informed about the possible health risks during the treatment; less than 50% of respondents knew about the benefits of X-ray examinations. About 70% of the patients rate their current problems with health higher compared to the risks from diagnostics and surgery. It explains the lack of interest to the radiation risk.
The article presents the results of a sociological survey of the population of three regions of the Northwest region of the Russian Federation: the Leningrad, Murmansk, and Arkhangelsk regions. The survey was conducted in 2016-2018 and investigated the population’s knowledge about radiation and sources of knowledge in view of the further development of nuclear power, the construction of radioactive waste storage facilities, and the increasingly widespread use of ionizing radiation sources in medicine and industry. The aim of the study was to examine how the degree of trust in certain sources of information and preferred ways of obtaining information depends on the gender, age, and educational level of respondents. Generalization of such materials makes it possible to optimize means and ways of improving public knowledge on radiation safety issues so that the population could adequately (without panic) treat reports concerning the development of nuclear power, construction of radioactive waste storage facilities, and the increasing use of ionizing radiation sources in medicine and industry. The study revealed that, regardless of gender, age, and education, respondents in all three surveyed regions want to receive information about the radiation situation only in the event of an emergency. A high percentage of the population, especially in the Leningrad and Murmansk regions, unreasonably characterize the level of radioactive contamination of their places of residence as strong, dangerous, and extremely dangerous, which indicates a poor level of knowledge of radiation safety issues. Age and education have no practically significant influence on this assessment. The respondents consider TV and the Internet to be the most popular sources of information about the radiation situation. At the same time, it is logical that older people prefer to receive information through traditional mass media, while younger people prefer the Internet.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.