There has been a recent spurt in application of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in dermatology and aesthetic medicine. However, the details regarding use of PRP in various dermatological indications ranging from hair restoration to chronic ulcers are dispersed in literature, herein we have tried to focus all under one heading. Overall, PRP seems to be a promising therapeutic modality but the level of evidence as of now, from the available published data is low. This review will also stimulate readers to carry out well designed, larger population based trials, so as to validate its use in dermatology practice.

Background Acquired dermal macular hyperpigmentation (ADMH) is an umbrella term including lichen planus pigmentosus, erythema dyschromicum perstans and pigmented contact/cosmetic dermatitis. Objective To establish contact sensitization to hair colours as an aetiological factor for ADMH. Methods Detailed clinical examination, skin biopsies, and patch and photo‐patch testing with Indian standard series and patient's own cosmetic products were performed. Results Thirty‐nine (36.1%) patients were found to demonstrate a positive patch/photo‐patch test with 35/39 reacting to their own products (all were hair colours) and 16/39 reacting to antigens from commercial series (commonly paraphenylenediamine). Fourteen patients developed delayed hyperpigmentation on positive patch‐test sites at 1 month. Higher mean age, symptomatic pigmentation (pruritus, burning and photosensitivity), hair margins involvement (outer surface, helix and lobule of ear; temples and preauricular area), ill‐defined lesions, epidermal atrophy and epidermal melanization extending >3 layers were significantly common in patch‐test‐positive patients. Well‐defined lesions, perioral involvement and associated lichen planus were clinical pointers towards patch‐test negativity. Conclusion Index study exemplifies that patch‐test results have distinct clinical and histopathological correlates in ADMH. Hair dye contact sensitization appears to be an important aetiological factor in about one‐third patients presenting with ADMH.

Tuberculosis verrucosa cutis (TVC) is a common cutaneous form of paucibacillary tuberculosis in an individual with moderate to high degree of immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Clinical appearance of TVC is mostly very typical with well-defined warty plaques presenting mostly on hands, knees, ankle, and buttocks; however several atypical morphology of the lesions have also been described. We hereby report a case of TVC, masquerading as asymptomatic diffuse keratoderma of left foot for nine months, in an otherwise healthy individual, obstructing easy diagnosis of cutaneous tuberculosis. Diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology.

Nerve function impairment (NFI) in leprosy may occur and progress despite multidrug therapy alone or in combination with corticosteroids. We observed improvement in neuritis when minocycline was administered in patients with type 2 lepra reaction. This prompted us to investigate the role of minocycline in recent onset NFI, especially in corticosteroid unresponsive leprosy patients. Leprosy patients with recent onset clinical NFI (<6 months), as determined by Monofilament Test (MFT) and Voluntary Muscle Test (VMT), were recruited. Minocycline 100mg/day was given for 3 months to these patients. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with 'restored,' 'improved,' 'stabilized,' or 'deteriorated' NFI. Secondary outcomes included any improvement in nerve tenderness and pain. In this pilot study, 11 patients were recruited. The progression of NFI was halted in all; with 9 out of 11 patients (81.82%) showing ?restored? or ?improved? sensory or motor nerve functions, on assessment with MFT and VMT. No serious adverse effects due to minocycline were observed. Our pilot study demonstrates the efficacy and safety of minocycline in recent onset NFI in leprosy patients. However, larger and long term comparative trials are needed to validate the efficacy of minocycline in leprosy neuropathy.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Cutaneous reactions to tattoos can be attributed either to trauma or to the exogenous pigment introduced into the skin. Red pigment is associated with a high sensitizing potential and is the most frequently implicated pigment inducing various types of histological reactions. Herein, we describe a patient with red tattoo pigment-induced granulomatous dermatitis that histologically revealed a very rare granuloma annulare-like reaction.