No abstract

While the U. S. Food and Drug Administration has approved several medications for the treatment of alcohol-related problems, their use has not gained wide acceptance in the United States. Typically, patients with alcohol use disorders are only referred to psychosocial support (e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous). However, the use of pharmacotherapy may complement psychosocial treatments, as evidence shows that pharmacotherapy can improve treatment outcomes. The effectiveness of pharmacotherapy depends on patient compliance with taking the medication and the context in which the medication is administered. BRENDA is a psychosocial program designed specifically to be used by many types of healthcare providers, including primary care clinicians. Designed to enhance medication and treatment compliance, BRENDA is an ideal approach for use in conjunction with pharmacotherapy. The BRENDA approach has 6 components: 1) a biopsychosocial evaluation; 2) a report of findings from the evaluation given to the patient; 3) empathy; 4) addressing patient needs; 5) providing direct advice; and 6) assessing patient reaction to advice and adjusting the treatment plan as needed. This paper describes these components and discusses how the empirical support for each component is linked to the enhancement of medication compliance and the improvement of treatment outcomes.

36 alcoholic patients, recruited from a treatment program, and 20 non-alcohol abusing control subjects were tested for their reactions to alcohol and non-alcohol cues. The cue exposure paradigm included audio-visual (video), tactile, olfactory, and guided imagery cue components related to alcohol and non-alcohol beverages. Response measures were analyzed for significant difference based on alcohol and non-alcohol cue and patient type. Among the subjective ratings, alcohol cue specific increases in alcohol craving, desire to drink, alcohol-like high, positive drinking expectancies and alcohol-like withdrawal were seen in alcoholic subjects. Among the physiological measures, alcohol cue specific increases in salivation were seen in alcoholic subjects. Changes in heart rate, skin conductance and temperature were not specific to alcohol cues, or to alcoholic patients. The smelling of alcohol had the greatest impact on alcohol craving and skin conductance in alcoholic subjects. These findings demonstrate robust subjective effects, and weak physiological effects, in response to a multidimensional alcohol cue exposure paradigm. The response profile indicates cue reactivity in alcoholics as an appetitive based form of alcohol craving.