Writer's cramp is a focal hand dystonia that specifically affects handwriting. Though writer's cramp has been attributed to a dysfunction of the basal ganglia, the role of the basal ganglia in the pathogenesis of writer's cramp remains to be determined. Seventeen patients with writer's cramp (nine females; age range: 24-71 years) and 17 healthy individuals (six females; age range: 27-68 years) underwent functional MRI (fMRI) while they discriminated the orientation of gratings delivered to the tip of the right index finger. Statistical parametric mapping was used to analyse the fMRI data. The significance level was set at a corrected P-value of 0.05. Relative to healthy controls, patients with writer's cramp showed a widespread bilateral increase in task-related activity in the putamen, caudate nucleus, internal globus pallidus and lateral thalamus. In these areas, hyperactivity was more pronounced in patients who had recently developed writer's cramp. The enhanced response of the basal ganglia to tactile input from the affected hand is compatible with the concept of impaired centre-surround inhibition within the basal ganglia-thalamic circuit and may lead to an excessive activation of sensorimotor cortical areas during skilled movements affected by dystonia. Outside the basal ganglia, dystonic patients showed task-related overactivity in visual cortical areas, left anterior insula and right intraparietal sulcus, but not in the primary or secondary sensory cortex. In addition, task-related activity in the cerebellar nuclei, posterior vermis, right paramedian cerebellar hemisphere and dorsal pons was inversely related with the severity of hand dystonia. Regional activity in these areas may reflect secondary adaptive reorganization at the systems level to compensate for the dysfunction in the basal ganglia-thalamic loop.

No abstract

Writer's cramp is a task-specific hand dystonia affecting handwriting. Clinical scores such as the Arm Dystonia Disability Scale (ADDS) or Writer's Cramp Rating Scale (WCRS) as well as kinematic analysis of handwriting movements have been used to assess functional impairment in affected patients. In 21 patients with writer's cramp and healthy controls, we analyzed the kinematics of writing and cyclic drawing movements. We rated the severity of dystonia using the ADDS and WCRS and correlated the clinical scores with movement kinematics. Mean stroke frequency was significantly reduced in dystonic patients. Drawing movements showed more frequently a decrease in stroke frequency than handwriting movements. During circle drawing, mean vertical peak velocity was more variable in patients relative to controls, indicating an impaired ability to reproduce the same kinematic pattern over time. An increase in vertical writing pressure was only observed during handwriting but not during circle drawing and may reflect a compensatory effort to stabilize the pencil. Kinematic measures and individual ADDS and WCRS scores did not correlate with each other. The lack of correlation is not surprising as ADDS, WCRS, and kinematic analysis probe different aspects of motor impairment. The ADDS characterizes how dystonia affects a set of fine manual tasks, whereas the WCRS scores the manifestation of dystonia during handwriting. Therefore, the clinical scores and kinematic analysis of handwriting provide complementary insights into motor impairment. Future studies need to address which combination of clinical scores and kinematic measures are most appropriate to quantify impairment in writer's cramp.

Writer's cramp (WC) is a focal task-specific dystonia characterized by sustained or intermittent muscle contractions while writing, particularly with the dominant hand. Since structural lesions rarely cause WC, it has been assumed that the disease might be caused by a functional maladaptation within the sensory-motor system. Therefore, our objective was to examine the differences between patients suffering from WC and a healthy control (HC) group with regard to the effective connectivity that describes causal influences one brain region exerts over another within the motor network. The effective connectivity within a network including contralateral motor cortex (M1), supplementary motor area (SMA), globus pallidus (GP), putamen (PU) and ipsilateral cerebellum (CB) was investigated using dynamic causal modeling (DCM) for fMRI. Eight connectivity models of functional motor systems were compared. Fifteen WC patients and 18 age-matched HC performed a sequential, five-element finger-tapping task with the non-dominant and non-affected left hand within a 3 T MRI-scanner as quickly and accurately as possible. The task was conducted in a fixed block design repeated 15 times and included 30 s of tapping followed by 30 s of rest. DCM identified the same model in WC and HC as superior for reflecting basal ganglia and cerebellar motor circuits of healthy subjects. The M1-PU, as well as M1-CB connectivity, was more strongly influenced by tapping in WC, but the intracortical M1-SMA connection was more facilitating in controls. Inhibiting influences originating from GP to M1 were stronger in controls compared to WC patients whereby facilitating influences the PU exerts over CB and CB exerts over M1 were not as strong. Although the same model structure explains the given data best, DCM confirms previous research demonstrating a malfunction in effective connectivity intracortically (M1-SMA) and in the cortico-basal ganglia circuitry in WC. In addition, DCM analysis demonstrates abnormal reciprocal excitatory connectivity in the cortico-cerebellar circuitry. These results highlight the dysfunctional cerebello-cortical as well as basalganglio-cortical interaction in WC.

Previous studies showed a beneficial effect of motor re-training in task-specific hand dystonia. Here we examined whether re-training needs to specifically focus on the task affected by dystonia. 21 patients with writer's cramp were randomly assigned to two types of re-training: One group of patients trained drawing and writing movements using a pen attached to the bottom of a finger splint. The second group used therapeutic putty to train finger movements without exercises of drawing and writing movements. Training lasted for eight weeks. Before re-training, affected hand and forearm were immobilized for four weeks to facilitate the responsiveness to re-training. Dystonia was assessed during handwriting using the Writer's Cramp Rating Scale. While no clinical improvement was observed immediately after immobilization, eight weeks of re-training improved task-specific dystonia relative to baseline (p=0.005). Both training modalities were equally effective. More severely affected patients benefited most. There was no correlation between disease duration and the individual treatment response. Re-training also improved hand function as indexed by the Arm Dystonia Disability Scale (p=0.008). Kinematic handwriting analysis showed that re-training lowered vertical force level and enhanced the fluency of handwriting. We conclude that re-training does not need to specifically focus on the task affected by dystonia to be clinically effective.