Background The secondary use of health data is central to biomedical research in the era of data science and precision medicine. National and international initiatives, such as the Global Open Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (GO FAIR) initiative, are supporting this approach in different ways (eg, making the sharing of research data mandatory or improving the legal and ethical frameworks). Preserving patients’ privacy is crucial in this context. De-identification and anonymization are the two most common terms used to refer to the technical approaches that protect privacy and facilitate the secondary use of health data. However, it is difficult to find a consensus on the definitions of the concepts or on the reliability of the techniques used to apply them. A comprehensive review is needed to better understand the domain, its capabilities, its challenges, and the ratio of risk between the data subjects’ privacy on one side, and the benefit of scientific advances on the other. Objective This work aims at better understanding how the research community comprehends and defines the concepts of de-identification and anonymization. A rich overview should also provide insights into the use and reliability of the methods. Six aspects will be studied: (1) terminology and definitions, (2) backgrounds and places of work of the researchers, (3) reasons for anonymizing or de-identifying health data, (4) limitations of the techniques, (5) legal and ethical aspects, and (6) recommendations of the researchers. Methods Based on a scoping review protocol designed a priori, MEDLINE was searched for publications discussing de-identification or anonymization and published between 2007 and 2017. The search was restricted to MEDLINE to focus on the life sciences community. The screening process was performed by two reviewers independently. Results After searching 7972 records that matched at least one search term, 135 publications were screened and 60 full-text articles were included. (1) Terminology: Definitions of the terms de-identification and anonymization were provided in less than half of the articles (29/60, 48%). When both terms were used (41/60, 68%), their meanings divided the authors into two equal groups (19/60, 32%, each) with opposed views. The remaining articles (3/60, 5%) were equivocal. (2) Backgrounds and locations: Research groups were based predominantly in North America (31/60, 52%) and in the European Union (22/60, 37%). The authors came from 19 different domains; computer science (91/248, 36.7%), biomedical informatics (47/248, 19.0%), and medicine (38/248, 15.3%) were the most prevalent ones. (3) Purpose: The main reason declared for applying these techniques is to facilitate biomedical research. (4) Limitations: Progress is made on specific techniques but, overall, limitations remain numerous. (5) Legal and ethical aspects: Differences exist between nations in the definitions, approaches, ...
Objective Critically ill patients admitted in ICU because of COVID-19 infection display severe hypoxemic respiratory failure. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommends oxygenation through high-flow nasal cannula over non-invasive ventilation. The primary outcome of our study was to evaluate the effect of the addition of a surgical mask on a high-flow nasal cannula system on oxygenation parameters in hypoxemic COVID-19 patients admitted in ICU who do not require urgent intubation. The secondary outcomes were relevant changes in PaCO2 associated with clinical modifications and patient’s feelings. Design We prospectively assessed 21 patients admitted in our mixed Intensive Care Unit of the Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc. Main results While FiO2 was unchanged, we demonstrate a significant increase of PaO2 (from 59 (± 6), to 79 mmHg (± 16), p < 0.001), PaO2/FiO2 from 83 (± 22), to 111 (± 38), p < 0.001) and SaO2 (from 91% (± 1.5), to 94% (± 1.6), p < 0.001), while the patients were under the surgical mask. The SpO2 returned to pre-treatment values when the surgical mask was removed confirming the effect of the device rather than a spontaneous positive evolution. Conclusion A surgical mask placed on patient’s face already treated by a High-flow nasal cannula device improves COVID-19 patient’s oxygenation admitted in Intensive Care Unit for severe hypoxemic respiratory failure without any clinically relevant side.
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
The limited dynamic range of the majority of auditory-nerve fibers represents a difficulty in accounting for normal hearing capabilities over the known psychoacoustic intensity range. The presence of noise is an additional complication because it will tend to saturate these fibers, thereby considerably reducing their dynamic range, i.e., the range of mean firing rates. In this study, simulations involving a model of auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus neurons were conducted using pure-tone stimuli in the presence of noise. The main focus is on the role of inhibition in regulating the activity of cells, improving their capability to represent signals in background noise. This concerns in particular those inhibitory neurons that receive input from a wide range of auditory-nerve fibers and respond with an onset chopper pattern. A detailed model of stellate cells is used. It allows several parameters such as the number, location, and strength of inputs to be manipulated. The fist part of this paper presents the model and its responses to pure-tone and noise stimuli presented separately. The model's capacity to generalize to tone/noise combinations is then tested. Responses to these stimuli are found to be qualitatively similar to neurophysiological findings. Model neurons exhibit appropriate shifts in their rate-level functions and their responses are inhibited or suppressed by tones outside their characteristic frequency. The model stellate cell is also found to display many of the temporal patterns reported in electrophysiological studies as a result of appropriate settings of certain parameters. Therefore, the model is sufficient to account for a larger number of findings and should serve as a basis for predicting responses to novel stimuli, or as a building block for modeling larger networks.
This paper presents a phenomenological model of the cochlea. It consists of a bank of nonlinear time-varying parallel filters and an active distributed feedback. Realistic filter shapes are obtained with the all-pole gamma-tone filter (APGF), which provides both a good approximation of the far more complex wave propagation or cochlear mechanics models and a very simple implementation. Special care has been taken in modeling nonlinear properties in order to mimic the responses of the cochlea to complex stimuli. As a result, the model reproduces several observed phenomena including compression, two-tone suppression, and suppression of tones by noise. The distributed feedback, based on physiological evidence from outer hair cell (OHC) functioning, controls the damping parameter of the APGF and provides good modeling of both low-side and high-side suppression. Responses to more complex stimuli as well as a study of the model's parameters are also presented. Areas of application of this type of model include understanding of signal coding in the cochlea and auditory nerve, development of hearing aids, speech analysis, as well as input to neural models of higher auditory centers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.