Lung sarcomatoid carcinoma of the lung is a rare tumor with a poor prognosis. More than 90% of them are pleomorphic, spindle cell and giant cell carcinoma (PSCGCC). This rare subtype of lung cancer is thought to be more resistant to chemotherapy, and a small subset of them seems to exhibit targetable mutations. Immunotherapy against PD1/PDL-1 is a new emerging treatment, and might be of interest in PSGSCC because they frequently express PD-L1. The aim of our work is to evaluate PD1 and PDL-1 expression in a surgical series of lung PSCGCC and their relationship with morphological and immunohistochemical parameters and prognosis. Thirty-six patients who underwent surgical resection of a PSGSCC were included. PD-L1 (E1L3N) expression on tumor cells and PD1 (NAT105) expression by tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were performed by immunohistochemistry. Results were compared to immunohistochemistry tests of TTF1, Napsin A, p40 and to molecular study of EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and HER2. Seventy-five % of PSCGCC were considered as positive for PD-L1.PD-L1 expression in PSGSCC is associated with TTF-1 and/or Napsin A expression (47.2%, p = 0.039). Few p40 positive PSCGCC expressed PD-L1 (8.3%, p = 0.013). PD1 expression was not related to TTF-1 and/or Napsin A expression (p = 0.47), p40 expression (p = 0.68) or survival (p = 0.14). PD-L1 or PD1 expression were not related to the age, gender, pT, pN, stage, visceral pleura invasion, histopathological subtype, the presence of giant cell component, the predominance of sarcomatoid component, and the presence of EGFR or BRAF or HER2 or PIK3CA mutation (p>0.05). PD-L1 expression was correlated with a worse overall survival in PSCGCC (p = 0.045). PD-L1 expression is frequent in PSCGCC and might be associated with the expression of adenocarcinoma markers (TTF-1, Napsin A) or the lack of expression of squamous cell carcinoma marker (p40).
This preliminary study demonstrated that the DCS with a pressure-measuring device is a minimal invasive system effective for treatment of PC in patients where the anterior chest wall is still compliant. The control of different pressure measurements could be used as the inclusion criterion as well as a predictive factor for aesthetic results and treatment duration.
ObjectivePostoperative lymphopenia has been proposed as a risk factor for postoperative infections but has never been identified as such in a multivariate analysis. Postoperative pneumonia (POP) is one of the most common complications after lung cancer surgery and is associated with a worse outcome. We aimed to evaluate the association between postoperative lymphopenia and POP after lung cancer surgery.MethodsPatients admitted for lung cancer surgery (lobectomy, bilobectomy, or pneumonectomy) aged ≥ 18 years and with no history of an immunosuppressive state were eligible for inclusion. Lymphocyte counts were determined in blood drawn on the day before surgery and at postoperative days 1, 3 and 7. POP diagnosis was based on clinical, biological and radiological data. A logistic regression model adjusted on currently described risk factors for POP was used to explain the onset of this condition.ResultsTwo hundred patients were included, of whom 43 (21.5%) developed POP. Preoperative lymphocyte count was 1.8±0.6x109 cells/L and 2.0±0.7x109 cells/L in patients with and without POP, respectively (P = .091). In both groups, the lymphocyte count nadir occurred at postoperative day 1. In multivariate analysis, lymphopenia at postoperative day 1 was significantly associated with increased risk of POP (odds ratio: 2.63, 95% CI [1.03–5.40]). POP rate at postoperative day 7 was higher in patients presenting low lymphocyte counts (≤1.19x109 cells/L) at postoperative day 1 (P = .003).ConclusionsOur study showed that lymphopenia following lung cancer surgery was maximal at postoperative day 1 and was associated with POP.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.