Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) are pervasive in gut microbiota, but it remains unclear how often ARGs are transferred, particularly to pathogens. Traditionally, ARG spread is attributed to horizontal transfer mediated either by DNA transformation, bacterial conjugation or generalized transduction. However, recent viral metagenome (virome) analyses suggest that ARGs are frequently carried by phages, which is inconsistent with the traditional view that phage genomes rarely encode ARGs. Here we used exploratory and conservative bioinformatic strategies found in the literature to detect ARGs in phage genomes, and experimentally assessed a subset of ARG predicted using exploratory thresholds. ARG abundances in 1181 phage genomes were vastly overestimated using exploratory thresholds (421 predicted vs 2 known), due to low similarities and matches to protein unrelated to antibiotic resistance. Consistent with this, four ARGs predicted using exploratory thresholds were experimentally evaluated and failed to confer antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli. Reanalysis of available human- or mouse-associated viromes for ARGs and their genomic context suggested that bona fide ARG attributed to phages in viromes were previously overestimated. These findings provide guidance for documentation of ARG in viromes, and reassert that ARGs are rarely encoded in phages.
Antibiotic resistance genes (ARG) are pervasive in gut microbiota, but it remains unclear how often ARG are transferred, particularly to pathogens. Traditionally, ARG spread is attributed to horizontal transfer mediated either by DNA transformation, bacterial conjugation or generalized transduction. However, recent viral metagenome (virome) analyses suggest that ARG are frequently carried by phages, which is inconsistent with the traditional view that phage genomes rarely encode ARG. Here we used exploratory and conservative bioinformatic strategies found in the literature to detect ARG in phage genomes, and experimentally assessed a subset of ARG predicted using exploratory thresholds. ARG abundances in 1,181 phage genomes were vastly over-estimated using exploratory thresholds (421 predicted vs 2 known), due to low similarities and matches to protein unrelated to antibiotic resistance. Consistent with this, 4 ARG predicted using exploratory thresholds were experimentally evaluated and failed to confer antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli. Re-analysis of available human-or mouse-associated viromes for ARG and their genomic context suggested that bona fide ARG attributed to phages in viromes were previously over-estimated. These findings provide guidance for documentation of ARG in viromes, and re-assert that ARG are rarely encoded in phages.
Enterococcus faecalis is an opportunistic pathogen that has emerged as a major cause of nosocomial infections worldwide. Many clinical strains are indeed resistant to last resort antibiotics and there is consequently a reawakening of interest in exploiting virulent phages to combat them. However, little is still known about phage receptors and phage resistance mechanisms in enterococci. We made use of a prophageless derivative of the well-known clinical strain E. faecalis V583 to isolate a virulent phage belonging to the Picovirinae subfamily and to the P68 genus that we named Idefix. Interestingly, most isolates of E. faecalis tested—including V583—were resistant to this phage and we investigated more deeply into phage resistance mechanisms. We found that E. faecalis V583 prophage 6 was particularly efficient in resisting Idefix infection thanks to a new abortive infection (Abi) mechanism, which we designated Abiα. It corresponded to the Pfam domain family with unknown function DUF4393 and conferred a typical Abi phenotype by causing a premature lysis of infected E. faecalis. The abiα gene is widespread among prophages of enterococci and other Gram-positive bacteria. Furthermore, we identified two genes involved in the synthesis of the side chains of the surface rhamnopolysaccharide that are important for Idefix adsorption. Interestingly, mutants in these genes arose at a frequency of ~10−4 resistant mutants per generation, conferring a supplemental bacterial line of defense against Idefix.
We evaluated the performance of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) associated with the Bruker BioTyperTM V7.0.0 database for the identification of 713 bacterial strains isolated from seafood products and sea water samples (ANSES B3PA collection) under culture conditions that may have been significantly different from those used to create the reference spectrum vs. the 16S rDNA sequencing. We identified 78.8% of seafood isolates with 46.7% at the species level (Bruker score above 2) and 21.2% (Bruker score between 1.7 and 2) at the genus level by the two identification methods, except for 3.8% of isolates with a difference of identification between the two methods (Bruker score between 1.7 and 2). There were 41.9% isolates (Bruker score below 1.7) with the identification at the genus level. We identified 94.4% of seafood isolates with 16S rDNA sequencing. The MALDI-TOF allowed a better strain identification to the species level contrary to the 16s rDNA sequencing, which allowed an identification mainly to the genus level. MALDI-TOF MS in association with the Bruker database and 16S rDNA sequencing are powerful tools to identify a wide variety of bacteria from seafood but require further identification by biochemical, molecular technique or other conventional tests.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.