All cells contain much more potassium, phosphate, and transition metals than modern (or reconstructed primeval) oceans, lakes, or rivers. Cells maintain ion gradients by using sophisticated, energydependent membrane enzymes (membrane pumps) that are embedded in elaborate ion-tight membranes. The first cells could possess neither ion-tight membranes nor membrane pumps, so the concentrations of small inorganic molecules and ions within protocells and in their environment would equilibrate. Hence, the ion composition of modern cells might reflect the inorganic ion composition of the habitats of protocells. We attempted to reconstruct the "hatcheries" of the first cells by combining geochemical analysis with phylogenomic scrutiny of the inorganic ion requirements of universal components of modern cells. These ubiquitous, and by inference primordial, proteins and functional systems show affinity to and functional requirement for K + , Zn 2+ , Mn 2+, and phosphate. Thus, protocells must have evolved in habitats with a high K + /Na + ratio and relatively high concentrations of Zn, Mn, and phosphorous compounds. Geochemical reconstruction shows that the ionic composition conducive to the origin of cells could not have existed in marine settings but is compatible with emissions of vapor-dominated zones of inland geothermal systems. Under the anoxic, CO 2 -dominated primordial atmosphere, the chemistry of basins at geothermal fields would resemble the internal milieu of modern cells. The precellular stages of evolution might have transpired in shallow ponds of condensed and cooled geothermal vapor that were lined with porous silicate minerals mixed with metal sulfides and enriched in K + , Zn 2+, and phosphorous compounds.

Photosynthetic water oxidation by photosystem II is mediated by a Mn4 cluster, a cofactor X still chemically ill-defined, and a tyrosine, YZ (D1-Tyr161). Before the final reaction with water proceeds to yield O2 (transition S4-->S0), two oxidizing equivalents are stored on Mn4 (S0-->S1-->S2), a third on X (S2-->S3), and a forth on YZ(S3-->S4). It has been proposed that YZ functions as a pure electron transmitter between Mn4X and P680, or, more recently, that it acts as an abstractor of hydrogen from bound water. We scrutinized the coupling of electron and proton transfer during the oxidation of YZ in PSII core particles with intact or impaired oxygen-evolving capacity. The rates of electron transfer to P680+, of electrochromism, and of pH transients were determined as a function of the pH, the temperature, and the H/D ratio. In oxygen-evolving material, we found only evidence for electrostatically induced proton release from peripheral amino acid residues but not from YZox itself. The positive charge stayed near YZox, and the rate of electron transfer was nearly independent of the pH. In core particles with an impaired Mn4 cluster, on the other hand, the rate of the electron transfer became strictly dependent on the protonation state of a single base (pK approximately 7). At pH < 7, the rate of electron transfer revealed the same slow rate (t1/2 approximately 35 microseconds) as that of proton release into the bulk. The deposition of a positive charge around YZox was no longer detected. A large H/D isotope effect (approximately 2.5) on these rates was also indicative of a steering of electron abstraction by proton transfer. That YZox was deprotonated into the bulk in inactive but not in oxygen-evolving material argues against the proposed role of YZox as an acceptor of hydrogen from water. Instead, the positive charge in its vicinity may shift the equilibrium from bound water to bound peroxide upon S3-->S4 as a prerequisite for the formation of oxygen upon S4-->S0.

Comparative analysis of 15 complete cyanobacterial genome sequences, including ''near minimal'' genomes of five strains of Prochlorococcus spp., revealed 1,054 protein families [core cyanobacterial clusters of orthologous groups of proteins (core CyOGs)] encoded in at least 14 of them. The majority of the core CyOGs are involved in central cellular functions that are shared with other bacteria; 50 core CyOGs are specific for cyanobacteria, whereas 84 are exclusively shared by cyanobacteria and plants and͞or other plastid-carrying eukaryotes, such as diatoms or apicomplexans. The latter group includes 35 families of uncharacterized proteins, which could also be involved in photosynthesis. Only a few components of cyanobacterial photosynthetic machinery are represented in the genomes of the anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria Chlorobium tepidum, Rhodopseudomonas palustris, Chloroflexus aurantiacus, or Heliobacillus mobilis. These observations, coupled with recent geological data on the properties of the ancient phototrophs, suggest that photosynthesis originated in the cyanobacterial lineage under the selective pressures of UV light and depletion of electron donors. We propose that the first phototrophs were anaerobic ancestors of cyanobacteria (''procyanobacteria'') that conducted anoxygenic photosynthesis using a photosystem I-like reaction center, somewhat similar to the heterocysts of modern filamentous cyanobacteria. From procyanobacteria, photosynthesis spread to other phyla by way of lateral gene transfer.cyanobacteria ͉ protein families ͉ lateral gene transfer

The rotary proton- and sodium-translocating ATPases are reversible molecular machines present in all cellular life forms that couple ion movement across membranes with ATP hydrolysis or synthesis. Sequence and structural comparisons of F- and V-type ATPases have revealed homology between their catalytic and membrane subunits, but not between the subunits of the central stalk that connects the catalytic and membrane components. Based on this pattern of homology, we propose that these ATPases originated from membrane protein translocases, which, themselves, evolved from RNA translocases. We suggest that in these ancestral translocases, the position of the central stalk was occupied by the translocated polymer.

No abstract

BackgroundThe F- and V-type ATPases are rotary molecular machines that couple translocation of protons or sodium ions across the membrane to the synthesis or hydrolysis of ATP. Both the F-type (found in most bacteria and eukaryotic mitochondria and chloroplasts) and V-type (found in archaea, some bacteria, and eukaryotic vacuoles) ATPases can translocate either protons or sodium ions. The prevalent proton-dependent ATPases are generally viewed as the primary form of the enzyme whereas the sodium-translocating ATPases of some prokaryotes are usually construed as an exotic adaptation to survival in extreme environments.ResultsWe combine structural and phylogenetic analyses to clarify the evolutionary relation between the proton- and sodium-translocating ATPases. A comparison of the structures of the membrane-embedded oligomeric proteolipid rings of sodium-dependent F- and V-ATPases reveals nearly identical sets of amino acids involved in sodium binding. We show that the sodium-dependent ATPases are scattered among proton-dependent ATPases in both the F- and the V-branches of the phylogenetic tree.ConclusionBarring convergent emergence of the same set of ligands in several lineages, these findings indicate that the use of sodium gradient for ATP synthesis is the ancestral modality of membrane bioenergetics. Thus, a primitive, sodium-impermeable but proton-permeable cell membrane that harboured a set of sodium-transporting enzymes appears to have been the evolutionary predecessor of the more structurally demanding proton-tight membranes. The use of proton as the coupling ion appears to be a later innovation that emerged on several independent occasions.ReviewersThis article was reviewed by J. Peter Gogarten, Martijn A. Huynen, and Igor B. Zhulin. For the full reviews, please go to the Reviewers' comments section.

Studies of the past several decades have provided major insights into the structural organization of biological membranes and mechanisms of many membrane molecular machines. However, the origin (s) of the membrane(s) and membrane proteins remain enigmatic. We discuss different concepts of the origin and early evolution of membranes, with a focus on the evolution of the (im)permeability to charged molecules, such as proteins and nucleic acids, and small ions. Reconstruction of the evolution of F-type and A/V-type membrane ATPases (ATP synthases), which are either proton or sodium-dependent, might help understand not only the origin of membrane bioenergetics, but also of membranes themselves. We argue that evolution of biological membranes occurred as a process of co-evolution of lipid bilayers, membrane proteins and membrane bioenergetics. Membrane evolution and the Last Universal Common AncestorA topologically closed membrane is a ubiquitous feature of all cellular life forms. This membrane is not a simple lipid bilayer enclosing the innards of the cell: far from that, even in the simplest cells, the membrane is a biological device of a staggering complexity that carries diverse protein complexes mediating energy-dependent -and tightly regulated -import and export of metabolites and polymers [1]. Despite the growing understanding of the structural organization of membranes and molecular mechanisms of many membrane proteins, the origin (s) of biological membranes remain obscure [2][3][4][5].The conservation of a set of essential genes between two major domains of life, archaea and bacteria, leaves no reasonable doubt in the existence of some version of Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA), the prototypic organism that led to the three branches of cellular life, namely, Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya [6]. The standard model of evolution places the primary division of cellular life forms between Archaea and Bacteria (e.g., [7]). Rooting the "tree of life" is an extremely difficult problem, and alternatives to the standard model were proposed including rooting within the bacteria [8] or between prokaryotes and eukaryotes [9]. In this article, we stick to the standard model that, on the weight of the totality of evidence, especially, the fundamental differences between DNA replication systems [10] and the membrane structure and biogenesis pathways (see below), we consider to be most plausible.Under the standard model, the approach of choice for the reconstruction of the early evolution of a particular cellular system is to systematically compare its components in Bacteria and Archaea [11]. This approach yields informative results, especially, in the case of the translation

Photosystem II (PSII) oxidizes two water molecules to yield dioxygen plus four protons. Dioxygen is released during the last out of four sequential oxidation steps of the catalytic centre (S 0 ⇒ S 1 , S 1 ⇒ S 2 , S 2 ⇒ S 3 , S 3 ⇒ S 4 → S 0 ). The release of the chemically produced protons is blurred by transient, highly variable and electrostatically triggered proton transfer at the periphery (Bohr effect). The extent of the latter transiently amounts to more than one H ϩ /e Ϫ under certain conditions and this is understood in terms of electrostatics. By kinetic analyses of electron-proton transfer and electrochromism, we discriminated between Bohr-effect and chemically produced protons and arrived at a distribution of the latter over the oxidation steps of 1 : 0 : 1 : 2. During the oxidation of tyr-161 on subunit D1 (Y Z ), its phenolic proton is not normally released into the bulk. Instead, it is shared with and confined in a hydrogenbonded cluster. This notion is difficult to reconcile with proposed mechanisms where Y Z acts as a hydrogen acceptor for bound water. Only in manganese (Mn) depleted PSII is the proton released into the bulk and this changes the rate of electron transfer between Y Z and the primary donor of PSII P ϩ 680 from electron to proton controlled. D1-His190, the proposed centre of the hydrogen-bonded cluster around Y Z , is probably further remote from Y Z than previously thought, because substitution of D1-Glu189, its direct neighbour, by Gln, Arg or Lys is without effect on the electron transfer from Y Z to P