This journal discusses the implementation of the Disgorgement Fund as an effort to provide protection for investors in the Indonesian capital market as outlined in POJK No. 65/POJK.04/2020 concerning Return of Illegal Profits and Investor Loss Compensation Fund in the Capital Market Sector. The issues raised are how to implement the Disgorgement Fund itself in Indonesia and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the Disgorgement Fund in Indonesia in an effort to provide protection to investors in Indonesia. In its implementation, the Disgorgement Fund can calm investors while minimizing the crime rate in the Indonesian capital market so that the integrity of the capital market can be maintained, even though there are weaknesses such as parties subject to illegal return of profits that can harm investors and the difficulty of proving crimes in the capital market. But with the disgorgement fund system, that is effective, proportional, and preventive so that it can make a party choose not to commit a violation. Returning illegal profits as a remedial action is expected to prevent parties who commit violations from enjoying the profits they have obtained illegally, compensate for losses from victims of violations, contain corrective elements, and are expected to provide a deterrent effect.
AbstrakLoan syndication assignment exists in secondmy market. Assignment is alegal means to solve liquidity problem or risk management. There areseveral methods of loan syndication transfer namely, assignment, novation,sub partcipation, subrogation, and cessie. Assignment and participation arethe methods of loan syndication transfer originated from common lawsystem. Novation is a method of loan syndication transfer which is known incommon law and civil law system as well. Cessie is a method of loansyndication transfer which has a deep root in civil law tradition. All of loansyndication methods are used in secondary loan syndication market. Theyhave different characteristics and {egal implications.
ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran dan tanggung jawab Notaris sebagai pejabat umum yang berwenang membuat akta autentik dan dalam menjalankan kegiatannya di bidang pasar modal, wajib terdaftar di Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, memenuhi persyaratan tertentu sebagai profesi penunjang pasar modal, dan memperoleh Surat Tanda Terdaftar Profesi Penunjang Pasar Modal. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 67 Tahun 2017 sebagai aturan dasar Notaris di bidang pasar modal memungkinkan seorang Notaris digantikan oleh Notaris Pengganti yang untuk sementara diangkat sebagai Notaris, dalam hal Notaris yang bersangkutan berhalangan dalam menjalankan jabatannya baik itu disebabkan karena sedang cuti, sakit, ataupun hal lain. Namun, menjadi suatu masalah apabila Notaris Pengganti tidak memiliki kapasitas untuk membuat akta autentik dalam hal Surat Tanda Terdaftar Profesi Penunjang Pasar Modal tidak aktif atau telah berakhir masa berlakunya dan tidak diajukan pengaktifan kembali, atau ketika akta yang dibuat ternyata tidak memenuhi syarat sebagai suatu akta autentik bahkan bisa menjadi batal demi hukum. Akibatnya, kekuatan hukum dan keabsahan akta tersebut menjadi dipertanyakan sehingga dapat merugikan para pihak yang berkepentingan dan Notaris Pengganti itu sendiri. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif yang mana mengkaji penerapan kaidah-kaidah atau norma-norma dalam hukum positif terhadap suatu masalah. Penelitian terhadap masalah hukum ini menggunakan pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan perundang-undangan.Kata Kunci: Keabsahan Akta; Notaris Pengganti; Pasar Modal; Surat Tanda Terdaftar Profesi Penunjang Pasar Modal; Tanggung Jawab ABSTRACTThis study aims to analyze the roles and responsibilities of a Notary as a public official who is authorized to make authentic deeds and in carrying out his/her activities in the capital market sector, must be registered with the Financial Services Authority, fulfill certain requirements as a capital market supporting profession, and obtain a Supporting Professional Registration Certificate in Capital Market. Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 67 of 2017 as a basic rule of Notary in the capital market sector allows a Notary to be replaced by a Substitute Notary who is temporarily appointed as a Notary, in the event that the Notary concerned is unable to carry out his position, whether it is due to being on leave, illness, or other thing. However, it becomes a problem if the Substitute Notary Public does not have the capacity to make an authentic deed in the event that the Capital Market Supporting Professional Registration Certificate is not active or its validity period has expired and re-activation is not proposed, or when the deed made does not meet the requirements as an authentic deed, or the deed itself can be null and void. As a result, the legal force and validity of the deed are questioned so that it could harm the parties and the Substitute Notary itself. The research method used is normative juridical which examines the application of the rules or norms in positive law to a problem. This research on legal issues uses a conceptual approach and a statutory approach.Keywords: Legality of Deed; Substitute Notary; Capital Market; Supporting Professional Registration Certificate in Capital Market; Responsibility
ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tanggung jawab Notaris terhadap pembuatan akta pernyataan keputusan rapat umum pemegang saham dan pemberitahuan kepada Menteri serta akibat hukum dari tidak diserahkannya dokumen surat penerimaan pemberitahuan perubahan data perseroan dari Menteri kepada Penghadap berdasarkan putusan Pengadilan Negeri Makassar Nomor 109/Pdt.G/2018/PN Mks. Melalui penelitian yuridis normatif dan bersifat eksplanatoris ini, menggunakan data sekunder yang diperoleh dari studi dokumen dan kepustakaan. Digunakan pula tiga bahan hukum yaitu bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, bahan hukum tersier. Dalam penyelenggaraan RUPS, peran Notaris dibutuhkan untuk membuat akta autentik guna menegaskan keputusan yang diambil dalam RUPS, salah satu nya keputusan terkait perubahan susunan anggota Direksi dan Dewan Komisaris yang termasuk perubahan data perseroan. Kata Kunci : Tanggung jawab; Notaris; Perubahan Data Perseroan; Perbuatan Melawan Hukum ABSTRACT This study aims to analyze the responsibility of the Notary to the composition of the deed of the decision of the general meeting of shareholders and notification to the Minister as well as the licit consequences of not submitting the letter of acceptance of the notification of the transmutation in company data from the Minister to the Appellant predicated on the decision of the Makassar District Court Number 109/Pdt.G/ 2018/PN Mks. Through this normative and explanatory juridical research, utilizing secondary data obtained from document and literature studies. Three licit materials are additionally utilized, namely primary licit materials, secondary licit materials, and tertiary licit materials.In holding the GMS, the role of the Notary is needed to make authentic deeds to corroborate the decisions taken at the GMS, one of which is the decision cognate to vicissitudes in the composition of the members of the Board of Directors and the Board of Commissioners which includes changes to company data. Keywords: responsibility; Notary Public; Changes to Company Data; Act against the law
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.