PurposeAlthough several factors have been considered to be associated with pivot shift test grade in ACL injured patients, a conclusion regarding which factors contribute to the pivot shift test grade has not been reached. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with preoperative pivot shift test grade. MethodsThree hundred and sixty‐six consecutive patients who underwent ACL reconstruction in our hospital were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of preoperative pivot shift test grade (Mild: grade 0–3, Severe: grade 4–6). First, 13 independent variables (age, gender, period from injury to surgery, hyperextension, KT measurement, contralateral side pivot shift test grade, medial and lateral tibial slope, lateral condyle length, lateral condyle height, distal femoral condyle offset, medial and lateral meniscus tear) were analyzed by one‐way ANOVA and Chi‐squared test. Binary Logistic regression was then performed based on the results of univariate analyses (independent variables of p < 0.2 were included). ResultsHyperextension, lateral meniscus tear, contralateral side pivot shift test grade, distal femoral condyle offset and KT measurement were identified as risk factors for preoperative pivot shift grade via logistic regression analysis. ConclusionThe current study revealed that hyperextension, lateral meniscus tear, contralateral side pivot shift test grade, distal femoral condyle offset and anterior instability were associated with preoperative pivot shift grade. Patients with above factors that cannot be modified during surgery may need special consideration when ACL reconstruction is performed, as greater preoperative pivot shift has been proven to be a risk factor for residual pivot shift after ACL reconstruction. Level of evidenceIII.
Purpose To investigate whether knee morphological features, patient characteristics, and intraoperative indings are associated with a lateral meniscus (LM) posterior root tear (LMPRT) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries with the integrated data from two academic centres. Methods This retrospective study used registry data acquired prospectively at two academic centres. Patients with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with LMPRT and no other LM injury were selected (LMPRT group) from each database. The control group included patients who underwent ACLR without LM tears. Patients were matched to the LMPRT group according to age and gender (1:1). Morphological factors evaluated on preoperative magnetic resonance image scans included lateral femoral condyle (LFC) anterior-posterior diameter, height, and depth; lateral tibial plateau (LTP) articular surface (AS) depth and sagittal plane depth; and lateral and medial posterior tibial slopes (PTSs). LFC height and depth ratios, LTP AS depth and sagittal plane depth ratios, and lateral-to-medial slope asymmetry were computed from previous measurements. Patient characteristics and intraoperative indings were extracted and compared between both groups. ResultsThe study included 252 patients (126 in each group). The lateral-medial asymmetry of PTS was greater in the LMPRT group (1.2° vs 0.3°, p < 0.05), and the LTP AS depth was smaller in the LMPRT group (31.4 mm vs 33.2 mm, p < 0.01). There were no diferences in LFC morphology between the control and LMPRT groups. Pivot shift grade (p < 0.05), percentage of complete ACL tears (p < 0.05), and medial meniscus ramp lesions (p < 0.05) were signiicantly higher in the LMPRT group. Conclusion LMPRT was associated with signiicantly increased lateral-medial asymmetry of PTS and signiicantly smaller LTP AS depth. LMPRT was also associated with an increase in the preoperative pivot shift grade and the presence of a medial meniscus ramp lesion. These morphological characteristics are rather simple to measure and would serve as helpful indicators to preoperatively detect LMPRT, which is frequently challenging to diagnose preoperatively. Level of evidence Level III. KeywordsLateral meniscus posterior root tear • ACL injury • Posterior tibial slope • Lateral tibial plateau articular surface depth * Hideyuki Koga
Fibrosis of the infrapatellar fat pad (IFP) occurs after knee joint surgery or during knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and causes persistent pain and limited mobility. Previous studies demonstrated that treating IFP fibrosis alleviated pain in animal models. In this study, we examined the effects of hyaluronic acid (HA) sheet transplantation on IFP fibrosis and articular cartilage degeneration in a monoiodoacetic acid (MIA) rat arthritis model (95 male rats). Rats received bilateral intra‐articular MIA injections (1.0 mg/30 μL) and underwent surgery 4 days later. HA sheets were transplanted on the right knee of each rat (HA group), with the left knee receiving sham surgery (sham group). Incapacitance tests were performed at multiple time points up to 28 days after MIA injection. Macroscopic, histological, and immunohistochemical analyzes were performed 14 and 28 days after injection. The concentrations of HA and interleukin‐1β (IL‐1β) in the synovial fluid were measured using ELISA. Transplantation of HA sheets could alleviate persistent pain 10–28 days after injection. The HA sheets inhibited articular cartilage degeneration at 14 days. Fibrosis and the invasion of calcitonin gene‐related peptide‐positive nerve fiber endings in the IFP were inhibited at both 14 and 28 days. Moreover, the HA sheets remained histologically until 10 days after transplantation. The concentration of HA reached its peak on Day 10 after transplantation; the concentration of IL‐1β in the sham group was significantly higher than that in the HA group on Day 7. Therefore, HA sheets could be a promising option to treat IFP fibrosis occurring in KOA and after knee joint surgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.