The practice of sharia economics is growing and diverse, which has resulted in the emergence of various sharia economic disputes. This requires the development of alternative dispute resolutions, as has been done by the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) by presenting Sharia Standards that specifically discuss tahkim. This paper aims to explain the provisions of tahkim in the Sharia Standards of AAOIFI and the urgency of resolving sharia economic disputes. Using the content analysis method by collecting various relevant references, this study found that various provisions must be met when carrying out a tahkim contract in the settlement of sharia economic disputes, including those relating to the pillars and requirements of tahkim, the object that is the authority of the tahkim contract, provisions for the appointment of judges, and the power of judges' decisions. The application of the tahkim contract in the settlement of sharia economic law disputes has several advantages, namely that it is fast, cheap, efficient, energy and thought-efficient, fair, and fulfills the benefits of the disputing parties, so the development and application of tahkim as an alternative economic dispute resolution is very important.
<p dir="ltr"><span id="docs-internal-guid-41f11696-7fff-db33-7f42-a6fcf5441a61"><span>A Compilation of islamic law “Kompilasi Hukum Islam”, which was ratified through Presidential Instruction (or now decree) No. 1 of 1991, is a modern codification of Islamic individual and family law that becomes the standard of judges' reference in resolving cases in religious courts. One of the critical parts of KHI is inheritance, which is the main focus of this paper. The article on inheritance in KHI is interesting for further review because it has a different legal provision to fiqh or qanun. Through the study of libraries with a philosophical approach, this paper intends to analyze the provisions that become a barrier to inheritance from the perspective of Maqāṣid al-Sharia. This study shows that the obstacles to obtaining inheritance for reasons of persecution and slander, as mentioned in article 173 KHI, are some barriers to one obtaining inheritance that are not discussed as a barrier to inheritance in the classic fiqh book of severe persecution and slander. Through literature research, it is understood that the decree of persecution and slander is a barrier to inheritance in line with the Maqāṣid al-Sharia, namely to protect the soul (hifz al-nafsi), then guard the property (hifz al-māl) and further maintain self-respect (hifz al-'Ird) Thus. However, severe persecution and slander are not listed in classical Islamic jurisprudence as a barrier to inheritance. With the study of Maqāṣid al-Sharia, these two things are very appropriate to be applied in the rule of inheritance law, especially in Indonesia, so that these two acts cause very much harm to the victim (heir).</span></span></p><div><span><br /></span></div><br /> <br />“Kompilasi Hukum Islam”, yang disahkan melalui Instruksi Presiden No. 1 Tahun 1991, merupakan kodifikasi modern hukum perseorangan dan keluarga Islam yang menjadi standar rujukan para hakim dalam menyelesaikan perkara di pengadilan agama. Salah satu bagian penting KHI adalah kewarisan, yang menjadi fokus utama dalam tulisan ini. Pasal tentang waris dalam KHI menarik dikaji lebih lanjut karena memiliki ketentuan hukum yang berbeda dengan fiqh atau qanun. Melalui studi pustaka dengan pendekatan filosofis, tulisan ini bermaksud menganalisis ketentuan yang menjadi penghalang warisan dari perspektif Maqāṣid al-Syarī’ah. Hasil studi ini menunjukkan bahwa halangan mendapatkan warisan karena alasan penganiayaan dan fitnah, sebagaimana yang disebutkan dalam pasal 173 KHI terdapat beberapa penghalang seseorang mendapatkan hak waris yang tidak dibahas sebagai penghalang kewarisan dalam kitab fiqh klasik yaitu penganiayaan berat dan fitnah. Melalui penelitian kepustakaan, dipahami bahwa ketetapan penganiayaan dan memfitnah sebagai penghalang kewarisan sejalan dengan Maqāṣid al-Syarī’ah yakni yakni untuk menjaga jiwa (hifẓal-nafsi), kemudian menjaga harta (hifẓal-māl) dan selanjutnya menjaga kehormatan diri (hifẓ al-‘Irḍ) Maka, sekalipun penganiayaan berat dan fitnah tidak tercantum dalam fiqh klasik sebagai penghalang kewarisan, namun dengan kajian Maqāṣid Syarī’ah, kedua hal ini sangat pantas diterapkan dalam aturan hukum waris, khususnya di Indonesia. Hal ini disebabkan karena dua perbuatan ini menyebabkan sangat banyak mudarat kepada korban (pewaris).
This paper's main problem is how to harmonize Islamic economic law with local culture, namely in petatah-petitih Minangkabau. This research departs from the Minangkabau religious customary philosophy, “Adat Basandi Syarak, Syarak Basandi Kitabullah”. Customary law and Islamic law as laws that live amid the Minangkabau society. Petatah-petitih, as a classic Minangkabau literature originating from the ancestors of the Minangkabau people, contains values to guide people in their behavior. Using literature study or documentation with qualitative descriptive research method, the research results reveal various harmonies between the values and principles of Islamic economic law with the values contained in petatah-petitih Minangkabau. Thus, the existence of petatah-petitih Minangkabau can play a role in internalizing the values of Islamic economic law in Minangkabau society. Enabling petatah-petitih Minangkabau indirectly also brings to life the values of Islamic economic law in the Minangkabau society.
This article discusses the ‘alasan khawatir’ [reason for concern] as a ground for the marriage dispensation files in Batusangkar Religious Court. This research had begun prior to the revision of the marriage dispensation regulation (Act 16/2019 and Supreme Court Regulation 5/2019). This is juridical-normative research accompanied by interviews. The data was gathered by investigating the marriage dispensation decisions (2017-2018) in Batusangkar Religious Court. Data was also obtained through interviews with judges, litigants, and figures who were capable to explain marriage dispensation in the Batusangkar community. This study finds that marriage dispensations in Batusangkar Religious Court are frequently justified by 'parental concerns'. The cases that are granted under these pretexts often do not reflect actual facts that led to marriage. Judges believe that decisions produced during that time are relevant to the information provided by the litigants, even if the judges did not hear the facts (clearly). In addition, this study indicates that, following the implementation of the new regulation, judges appear to be more motivated to prioritize the child's best interests as a principle to consider. As a result, granted applications become more stringent in emergency situations and according to the child's best interests.Artikel ini mendiskusikan ‘alasan khawatir’ sebagai landasan yang sering digunakan dalam permohonan dispensasi kawin. Penelitian ini awalnya dilakukan sebelum revisi peraturan dispensasi kawin tahun 2019 (UU 16/2019 dan Perma 5/2019). Secara metodologis, penelitian ini termasuk penelitian yuridis-normatif yang disertai dengan wawancara. Data dikumpulkan dengan menginvestigasi penetapan-penetapan dispensasi kawin yang diputuskan oleh Pengadilan Agama Batusangkar tahun 2017-2018. Data juga diperoleh dengan mewawancarai para hakim, litigan, dan beberapa tokoh yang dikira mampu menjelaskan fenomena dispensasi kawin di kehidupan masyarakat Batusangkar. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perkara-perkara permohonan dispensasi kawin tahun 2017-2018 di PA Batusangkar berisi alasan ‘khawatiran orang tua’ sebagai dasar permohonan. Perkara-perkara yang dikabulkan dengan dalih tersebut sering tidak merepresentasikan kejadian atau peristiwa yang mendesak untuk menikah. Hakim PA Batusangkar meyakini bahwa setiap penetapan hukum yang dihasilkan pada saat itu relevan dengan keterangan yang diberikan oleh para pemohon, meskipun hakim tidak dengan jelas mendengar fakta-fakta yang mendorong para litigant tersebut. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga mengindikasikan bahwa setelah keberadaan aturan yang baru, para hakim PA Batusangkar tampaknya terdorong lebih memperhatikan kepentingan terbaik bagi anak sebagai poin pertimbangan. Ini berkonsekuensi pada permohonan-permohonan yang dikabulkan jadi lebih mengetat pada kasus-kasus yang dianggap mendesak kemudian dihakimi sesuai dengan kepentingan terbaik bagi anak.
Some Muslims have stood up against health protocols for burying COVID-19 corpses. This research aimed to investigate the initial occurrence of this resistance in society, the contributing factors to the resistance, and the implications of the resistance. To date, most studies on resistance focused on social perspectives, but this research probed into the discourse of resistance during COVID-19 from the perspective of legal transformation, especially in Islamic law or fiqh. This study employed a qualitative approach supported by data obtained from printed and electronic media, and informants. The analysis revealed that public resistance to the burial which complied to health protocols was not only embodied in rhetorics or values but made apparent in their attitude. This study concludes that public resistance sucessfully reformed the law by bringing about the new fiqh regarding the burial practice. Since the community might not readily understand and accept this neq fiqh, we advised the government and related institutions to take intensive approaches to introduce this transformation to public.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.