During apoptotic cell death, cellular stress signals converge at the mitochondria to induce mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) through BCL-2 family proteins and their effectors. BCL-2 proteins function through protein-protein interactions, the mechanisms and structural aspects of which are only just being uncovered. Recently, the elucidation of the dynamic features underlying their function has highlighted their structural plasticity and the consequent complex thermodynamic landscape governing their protein-protein interactions. These studies show that canonical interactions involve a conserved, hydrophobic groove, whereas noncanonical interactions function allosterically outside the groove. Here, we review the latest structural advances in understanding the interactions and functions of mammalian BCL-2 family members and discuss new opportunities to modulate these proteins in health and disease.

Here we present an evaluation of the binding affinity prediction accuracy of the free energy calculation method FEP+ on internal active drug discovery projects and on a large new public benchmark set. File list (3) download file view on ChemRxiv manuscript.pdf (4.23 MiB) download file view on ChemRxiv supplementary.pdf (0.92 MiB) download file view on ChemRxiv tables.zip (5.99 KiB)

Compounds that selectively prevent or disrupt the association between the c-Myc oncoprotein and its obligate heterodimeric partner Max (Myc-Max compounds) have been identified previously by high-throughput screening of chemical libraries. Although these agents specifically inhibit the growth of c-Myc -expressing cells, their clinical applicability is limited by their low potency. We describe here several chemical modifications of one of these original compounds, 10058-F4, which result in significant improvements in efficacy. Compared with the parent structure, these analogues show enhanced growth inhibition of c-Myc -expressing cells in a manner that generally correlates with their ability to disrupt c-Myc-Max association and DNA binding. Furthermore, we show by use of a sensitive fluorescence polarization assay that both 10058-F4 and its active analogues bind specifically to monomeric cMyc. These studies show that improved Myc-Max compounds can be generated by a directed approach involving deliberate modification of an index compound. They further show that the compounds specifically target c-Myc, which exists in a dynamic and relatively unstructured state with only partial and transient A-helical content. [Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6(9):2399 -408]

Deregulation of the c-Myc transcription factor is involved in many types of cancer, making this oncoprotein an attractive target for drug discovery. One approach to its inhibition has been to disrupt the dimeric complex formed between its basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper (bHLHZip) domain and a similar domain on its dimerization partner, Max. As monomers, bHLHZip proteins are intrinsically disordered (ID). Previously we showed that two c-Myc-Max inhibitors, 10058-F4 and 10074-G5, bound to distinct ID regions of the monomeric c-Myc bHLHZip domain. Here, we use circular dichroism, fluorescence polarization, and NMR to demonstrate the presence of an additional binding site located between those for 10058-F4 and 10074-G5. All seven of the originally identified Myc inhibitors are shown to bind to one of these three discrete sites within the 85-residue bHLHZip domain of c-Myc. These binding sites are composed of short contiguous stretches of amino acids that can selectively and independently bind small molecules. Inhibitor binding induces only local conformational changes, preserves the overall disorder of c-Myc, and inhibits dimerization with Max. NMR experiments further show that binding at one site on c-Myc affects neither the affinity nor the structural changes taking place upon binding to the other sites. Rather, binding can occur simultaneously and independently on the three identified sites. Our results suggest the widespread existence of peptide regions prone to small-molecule binding within ID domains. A rational and generic approach to the inhibition of protein-protein interactions involving ID proteins may therefore be possible through the targeting of ID sequence.

The basic-helix-loop-helix-leucine-zipper domains of the c-Myc oncoprotein and its obligate partner Max are intrinsically disordered (ID) monomers that undergo coupled folding and binding upon heterodimerization. We have identified the binding sites and determined the structural means by which two unrelated small molecules, 10058-F4 and 10074-G5, bind c-Myc and stabilize the ID monomer over the highly ordered c-Myc-Max heterodimer. In solution, the molecules bind to distinct regions of c-Myc and thus limit its ability to interact with Max and assume a more rigid and defined conformation. The identification of multiple, specific binding sites on an ID domain suggests that small molecules may provide a general means for manipulating the structure and function of ID proteins, such as c-Myc.

Following DNA damage, nuclear p53 induces the expression of PUMA, a BH3-only protein that binds and inhibits the anti-apoptotic BCL-2 repertoire, including BCL-xL. PUMA, unique amongst BH3-only proteins, disrupts the interaction between cytosolic p53 and BCL-xL, allowing p53 to promote apoptosis via direct activation of the BCL-2 effector molecules, BAX and BAK. Structural investigations using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography revealed that PUMA binding induced partial unfolding of two α-helices within BCL-xL. Wild-type PUMA or a PUMA mutant incapable of causing binding-induced unfolding of BCL-xL equivalently inhibited the anti-apoptotic BCL-2 repertoire to sensitize for death receptor (DR)-activated apoptosis, but only wild-type PUMA promoted p53-dependent, DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Our data suggest that PUMA-induced partial unfolding of BCL-xL disrupts interactions between cytosolic p53 and BCL-xL, releasing the bound p53 to initiate apoptosis. We propose that regulated unfolding of BCL-xL provides a mechanism to promote PUMA-dependent signaling within the apoptotic pathways.

Understanding signaling and other complex biological processes requires elucidating the critical roles of intrinsically disordered proteins and regions (IDPs/IDRs), which represent ~30% of the proteome and enable unique regulatory mechanisms. In this review we describe the structural heterogeneity of disordered proteins that underpins these mechanisms and the latest progress in obtaining structural descriptions of ensembles of disordered proteins that are needed for linking structure and dynamics to function. We describe the diverse interactions of IDPs that can have unusual characteristics such as “ultrasensitivity” and “regulated folding and unfolding”. We also summarize the mounting data showing that large-scale assembly and protein phase separation occurs within a variety of signaling complexes and cellular structures. In addition, we discuss efforts to therapeutically target disordered proteins with small molecules. Overall, we interpret the remodeling of disordered state ensembles due to binding and post-translational modifications within an expanded framework for allostery that provides significant insights into how disordered proteins transmit biological information.

B‐cell lymphoma 2 (BCL‐2) family proteins mediate mitochondrial apoptosis by regulating mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP), which leads to the activation of the downstream caspase cascade to execute apoptosis. The pro‐apoptotic and anti‐apoptotic BCL‐2 proteins function through protein‐protein interactions in soluble and membrane‐associated states. How soluble BCL‐2 proteins interact is well understood. Anti‐apoptotic proteins, such as BCL‐2 and BCL‐xL, and the pro‐apoptotic effectors of MOMP, including BAK and BAX, interact with pro‐apoptotic BCL‐2 homology 3 (BH3)‐only proteins similarly. Whereas anti‐apoptotic BCL‐2 proteins tightly bind all the BH3‐only proteins to block apoptosis initiation, the effector BCL‐2 proteins are potently triggered by specific BH3‐only proteins to undergo conformational changes, membrane association and insertion, oligomerization, and pore formation. The anti‐apoptotic BCL‐2 proteins also inhibit the activated effectors. p53 is a direct BAX activator inhibited by BCL‐xL, defining a prototype non‐canonical modulator of BCL‐2 proteins‐mediated MOMP. How BCL‐2 proteins cooperate in the presence of membranes remains poorly understood, impeding our understanding of MOMP and apoptosis. Here, we highlight the latest structural views of MOMP by BCL‐2 proteins.