BackgroundEthnoveterinary knowledge in Europe may play an important role as a basis for sustainable treatment options for livestock. Aims of our study were (a) to compare the ethnoveterinary practices of two culturally and sociodemographically different regions of Switzerland, (b) to compare results with earlier ethnoveterinary studies conducted in Switzerland and in adjacent Italian regions and, (c) to evaluate possible reasons for regional differences in European ethnoveterinary medicine.Methods25 interviews were conducted in 2014 in all Italian speaking regions (ItR) of Switzerland, and 31 interviews were held in five north-western German speaking Cantons (GeC). Semi-structured questionnaires were used to collect detailed information regarding plant species, mode of preparation, dosage, route of administration, category of use, origin of knowledge, frequency of use, and satisfaction with outcomes of the treatments.ResultsA total of 162 homemade remedies in ItR and 219 in GeC were reported, out of which 125 and 145, respectively, were reported to contain only one plant species (homemade single species herbal remedy report, HSHR). 44 ItR and 43 GeC plant species were reported to treat livestock, of which only a half were used in both regions. For each HSHR, we classified the treatment intention of all use reports (UR), leading to a total of 205 and 219 UR in ItR and GeC respectively. While cattle were the most often treated livestock species in both study regions, in ItR 40% of UR were administered to small ruminants. Main indications in both regions were gastrointestinal diseases and skin afflictions, but in ItR a high number of URs were reported as antiparasitics. URs were mainly handed down from the past generation, but in GeC the source of knowledge for 20% of URs were from courses. Regarding the used plant species, ItR showed a higher concordance with Swiss than Italian studies, but with some differences to all regions. A total of 22 (14 ItR; 8 GeC) plant species in this study have not been reported before in ethnoveterinary studies of Swiss and Italian alpine regions.ConclusionsItR and GeC, show differences and similarities with respect to their own ethnoveterinary practices and earlier Swiss and Italian ethnoveterinary studies. Linguistic, geographical, as well as social and farm-structural conditions influence the regional ethnoveterinary knowledge. However, political borders seem to be more important than language or geographical barriers.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13002-016-0106-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The envelope glycoprotein of small ruminant lentiviruses (SRLV) is a major target of the humoral immune response and contains several linear B-cell epitopes. We amplified and sequenced the genomic segment encoding the SU5 antigenic site of the envelope glycoprotein of several SRLV field isolates. With synthetic peptides based on the deduced amino acid sequences of SU5 in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), we have (i) proved the immunodominance of this region regardless of its high variability, (ii) defined the epitopes encompassed by SU5, (iii) illustrated the rapid and peculiar kinetics of seroconversion to this antigenic site, and (iv) shown the rapid and strong maturation of the avidity of the anti-SU5 antibody. Finally, we demonstrated the modular diagnostic potential of SU5 peptides. Under Swiss field conditions, the SU5 ELISA was shown to detect the majority of infected animals and, when applied in a molecular epidemiological context, to permit rapid phylogenetic classification of the infecting virus.Caprine arthritis-encephalitis virus (CAEV) of goats and maedi-visna virus (MVV) of sheep belong to the genus Lentivirus of the family Retroviridae (18,22,39). Strong evidence indicates that cross-species transmission from sheep to goats and vice versa occurs under field conditions (16, 24, 33). Therefore, these viruses are no longer considered to be species specific and are referred to as small-ruminant lentiviruses (SRLV).The majority of infected animals mount a strong immune response to these viruses but remain persistently infected. Only one-third of infected goats develop overt clinical disease, and in sheep the percentage of animals with clinical symptoms differs greatly between breeds, strongly suggesting that, in both species, genetic factors play a key role in determining the clinical outcome of infection (11,28,29).In several countries, eradication programs have been initiated to control SRLV-induced diseases with the aim of eliminating these viruses (23). The Swiss CAEV eradication program, initiated in 1984, has reduced the seroprevalence from 60 to 80% to less than 1% and eliminated clinical cases in the goat population (14, 15). However, in the last phase of the eradication program, detection and elimination of the remaining virus carriers appear to be very difficult. The serological tools currently used (37, 38) are of limited use when applied to screen a population with a low seroprevalence. In the absence of reliable tools to directly detect SRLV, consistent serological diagnoses depend on the costly use of a combination of tests run in parallel (4). Major problems in SRLV serology are slow seroconversions and low titers of antibody to Gag in some animals. In this respect, the strong immunogenicity of the envelope glycoprotein (Env) and especially the rapid seroconversion induced by this antigen in infected animals make it an ideal candidate for diagnostic applications (2, 19). Goats and sheep infected with SRLV develop high titers of antibodies to several conformational and linear ...

No abstract

No abstract

The first part of this study was a cross-sectional analysis of the impact of 29 management factors on udder health in organic dairy farms in Switzerland. All 77 farms joined the extension program 'pro-Q'. As a measure of udder health the theoretical bulk milk somatic cell count (TBMSCC) calculated by the monthly cow composite somatic cell count over a time period of 1 year was chosen. The basic udder health of the farms was determined by TBMSCC during the year prior to the start of the project (mean for all farms 5 176 460 cells/ml). In the multivariable analysis, the five factors 'swiss brown breed', 'alpine summer pasturing', 'calf feeding with milk from mastitis diseased cows', 'hard bedding' and 'no post-milking' remained as significant risk factors on udder health. In the second part of the study, the development of management factors and the udder health situation affected by an extension program after 1 year was investigated. A partial improvement of the management factors on the farms but no overall improvement on udder health and no association between management changes and udder health changes were found. Improvement of udder health was more likely in farms with higher basic TBMSCC than in those farms with less udder health problems at the beginning of the project.