Actualmente, presenciamos el aumento del principio general de los discursos del derecho administrativo en todos los sistemas legales para potenciar los valores de buena administración en los órdenes legales administrativos. En numerosos litigios administrativos, los jueces han invocado algunos casos de principios legales que se imponen al contexto de las acciones del gobierno como criterios modernos y requisitos legales; pero, a pesar del papel normativo determinista del principio general del derecho administrativo, su concepto aún no está definido con precisión. Existen múltiples trabajos meticulosos que identifican el concepto de “principio legal” y sus ejemplos conocidos en los sistemas legales; sin embargo, esencialmente no queda claro si, existencialmente, tenemos principios generales de derecho administrativo en nuestros sistemas legales administrativos. Por lo tanto, este documento se es fuerza por proporcionar una respuesta convincente a la pregunta al presentar un discurso estricto sobre la definición del principio general del derecho administrativo y sus posibles instancias en los sistemas legales administrativos, principalmente entre las decisiones de los jueces de la Unión Europea y el Reino Unido —de los cuales representan normas administrativas fundamentales—, al descubrir un concepto general preciso de cada uno de ellos en los sistemas legales, se puede hacer un retrato genérico de la cara del derecho administrativo global.
There have been great developments in the fields of Neuroscience, which proved to be an immediate and powerful catalyst to understand how the nervous system works and also exerts influence upon neurolaw. By working on brain, neurolaw-scientists try to understand human behaviors. Government in terrorism, as an instance of the state of emergency, occasionally relies on neuroscience achievements through brain imaging of suspects for terrorist, to get access to their intentions, minds, background thoughts and last or possible future behaviors. Governments justified this neuroscientific technological measure, which causes deprivation from right to cognitive liberty, under the pretext of public security. On the basis of emergency theory, scholars argue that Government can deviate from its human rights obligations towards individuals in emergency, in order to bring about derogation from rights. In this paper main experimental neurological achievements have been investigated and their effects in law have been significantly analyzed. Drawing from human rights and emergency theory in the area of neurolaw, as a new born interdisciplinary study field, this paper sheds light of inquiry upon brain imaging as justified terrorism emergency measures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.