The Sars-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in significant and unprecedented shifts in the delivery of health care services in the United States. Although wound care remains an essential service during the COVID-19 pandemic, the financial consequences and infectious disease ramifications of the pandemic have resulted in closure or limitation of hours in many outpatient wound and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) centers. As HBOT patients often require daily treatment sessions for a period of months, it is necessary for facilities providing HBOT services to adjust to the COVID-19 pandemic while still maintaining availability of this important service. Modification of HBOT session timing and chamber decontamination procedures, utilisation of telehealth services for initial patient evaluations, and acceptance of novel patient populations and diagnoses are mechanisms by which HBOT centers can adapt to the evolving model of health care delivery throughout a pandemic. While COVID-19 is not a currently accepted indication for HBOT, patients may be referred for HBOT consultation due to the post-infectious sequelae of the virus, and thus HBOT facilities must be aware of the potential uses of this treatment for post-viral complications. By redefining paradigms for health care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic, HBOT and wound centers can continue to provide high-quality and uninterrupted care to vulnerable patient populations.

Background: Facial feminization is a critical step in a transfeminine patient's surgical transition. However, the existing literature on the various types of feminization surgeries suffers from inadequate reporting on perioperative aspects of care, such as preoperative evaluation and postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate facial feminization surgery (FFS), preoperative planning, and patient reported outcomes after various types of procedures. Methods: An electronic database search of Ovid MEDLINE was completed according to PRISMA guidelines for articles pertaining to FFS. Study characteristics, operative information, and patient demographics were collected. Data concerning preoperative imaging, virtual simulation, postoperative complications, and patientreported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected and analyzed for patterns. Results: A total of 22 papers representing 1302 patients were included for analysis. The most commonly discussed operations included upper face procedures, particularly of the forehead (17 studies, 77%). When discussed, preoperative planning for FFS included standard photography in 19 (86%) studies, advanced imaging, such as cephalometry or computed tomography, in 12 (55%) studies, and virtual simulation of surgical outcomes in four (18%) studies. Patient-centered outcomes, such as postoperative satisfaction, were described in 17 (77%) studies. Standardized PROMs were heterogenous across included studies with only 11 (50%) including at least one PROM. Conclusions: FFS is common, safe, and highly satisfying for transfeminine patients seeking surgical intervention for identity actualization. Future research concerning transgender care must evaluate advanced surgical planning and 3D simulation combined with more standardized assessment of PROMs to ensure high-quality analysis of patient satisfaction.

Background: Plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) academic positions are more coveted each year. We aim to determine the requirement of fellowship training before PRS academic appointments. Methods: PRS faculty at U.S. academic institutions associated with the American Society of Plastic Surgeons were identified. Outcomes studied included integrated versus independent training, fellowships, gender, academic title, years on faculty, and publications before current hire. Results: Of the 1052 PRS faculty identified, 646 were included across 41 states and the District of Columbia. Seventy-four percent were identified as men (n = 477), and 26.2% (n = 169) identified as women. Academic faculty were significantly more likely to have completed fellowship before hire than not (p<0.0001). An integrated route of training was associated with higher odds of fellowship completion before appointment (OR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.49-3.22). Odds of fellowship completion was significantly greater among faculty who graduated 5-10 years ago (OR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.48-4.41) and within the last 5 years (OR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.18-3.17). Professors were less likely to have completed fellowship training before appointment compared with assistant professors (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.80). Regarding gender, number of prior publications, or completion of another degree, no significant difference was found between fellowship-and non-fellowship-trained faculty. Conclusions: Although more plastic surgeons enter the field through a shortened integrated residency, the increasing demand for further subspecialization may cause significant challenges for upcoming graduates pursuing an academic appointment. Undergoing additional training considerably impacts social and financial decision-making early in surgical careers for newly graduated residents.

Objective: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is a useful adjunctive treatment for selected complicated wounds, including severe diabetic lower extremity ulcerations and compromised skin grafts or flaps. The Sars-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted healthcare delivery, with its effects extending to delivery of HBOT. During the pandemic, paediatric patients in our geographic region who were referred for HBOT faced challenges as centres temporarily closed or were unprepared to treat younger patients. Our monoplace HBOT centre modified existing practices to allow for treatment of these patients. This study aims to outline the steps necessary to adapting a pre-existing HBOT centre for the safe treatment of paediatric patients. Method: A retrospective review was performed to identify patients 18 years of age or younger referred for HBOT during 2020. Patient characteristics, referral indications and HBOT complications were collected. Changes implemented to the HBOT centre to accommodate the treatment of paediatric patients were documented. Results: A total of seven paediatric patients were evaluated for HBOT and six were treated. The mean patient age was four years (range: 1–11 years). Referral diagnoses included sudden sensorineural hearing loss, skin flap or graft compromise, and radiation-induced soft tissue necrosis. All patients tolerated HBOT treatment in monoplace chambers without significant complications noted. Enhancements made to our clinical practice to facilitate the safe and effective treatment of paediatric patients included ensuring the availability of acceptable garments for paediatric patients, maintaining uninterrupted patient grounding (in relation to fire safety), and enhancing social support for anxiety reduction. Conclusion: The results of our review show that paediatric patients can be safely treated within the monoplace hyperbaric environment.

Objective: To identify the impact that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) use has on wound healing outcomes in patients with comorbidities. Method: A retrospective chart review evaluating all new patients presenting to our tertiary wound care centre in 2013 with lower extremity wounds. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they took statins or not. Data on wound healing outcomes and wound/patient characteristics were collected. Primary outcomes included healing rate and progression to complete wound healing. Patients were excluded if they had incomplete data or were lost to follow-up before healing status could be confirmed. Results: A total of 194 patients met the inclusion criteria and were allocated to either the statin group (n=89) or to the non-statin group (n=105). Median initial wound size was 0.6cm3 (Interquartile range (IQR): 0.15–2.4) (p=0.684). In the statin group, 54 (60.6%) patients progressed to complete wound healing compared with 47 (44.7%) in the non-statin group (p=0.027). Median rate of wound healing was 6.7×10-3cm3/day (IQR: 1.5×10-3–2.6×10-2) compared with 3.8×10-3cm3/day (IQR: 1.7×10-3–1.3×10-2) in the non-statin group (p=0.773). Increased age and a higher number of comorbidities were reported in the statin group (p<0.001), respectively). A total of seven patients required amputation: five patients in the statin group and two patients in the non-statin group (p=0.250). Conclusion: This study revealed increased progression to wound healing in patients who were taking statins. The influence of statins on wound healing is promising, but future trials are needed to justify use of this medication class independent of cardiovascular benefit and exclusively for wound healing.

Background Genital‐based gender affirmation surgery is a physically demanding procedure requiring extensive postoperative pain management. However, perioperative opioid use for these procedures is relatively understudied. Objectives This study analyzes whether intravenous patient‐controlled analgesia (PCA) enhances pain control after penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) in the setting of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, and whether non‐PCA (NCA)‐based regimens could reduce postoperative opioid use. Methods All patients undergoing PIV with ERAS protocols by a single provider from December 2018 to November 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, comorbid conditions, pain scores, length of stay (LOS), and opioid usage during their hospitalization were collected. Postoperative opioid use and pain scores were compared between PCA and NCA patient cohorts. Results A total of 61 patients were included. 30 patients received intravenous PCA postoperatively, and 31 patients used NCA‐based narcotic pain control. All patients underwent ERAS protocol perioperatively. Average patient age was 34.5 years (SD 11.9) in the PCA cohort and 37.6 years (SD 11.9) in the NCA cohort (p = 0.242). Average total postoperative opioid use during hospital stay was reduced by 53.7% in the NCA cohort, with an average use of 501.6 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) (SD 410.3) among PCA patients and an average use of 232.0 MME (SD 216.5) among NCA patients (p = 0.003). Daily average pain scores for postoperative days 1 to 6 did not differ between the PCA and NCA patient groups (p > 0.05). Average hospital LOS was shorter among NCA patients, 6.2 days (SD 1.0) versus 7.3 days (SD 1.4), respectively, (p < 0.001). Discussion In combination with an ERAS non‐narcotic pain control protocol, it may be possible to reduce opioid use by more than 50% and shorten length of postoperative hospital stay among patients by implementing NCA pain management protocols. Conclusion Minimizing postoperative opioid consumption after PIV will benefit patients and their sustained well‐being.

Background: Simultaneous ventral hernia repair with panniculectomy (VHR-PAN) is associated with a high rate of wound complications. Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has been shown to lower complications in high-risk wounds. There is a debate in the literature as to whether ciNPWT is effective at preventing complications in VHR-PAN. The aim of our study was to evaluate if ciNPWT improves outcomes of VHR-PAN. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent VHR-PAN between 2009 and 2021 was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) those who received standard sterile dressings (SSD), or (2) ciNPWT. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications, including surgical site occurrences (SSO) and hernia recurrence. Results: A total of 114 patients were identified: 57 patients each in the SSD group and ciNPWT group. The groups were similar in demographics and comorbidities. There were more smokers in the SSD group (22.8% versus 5.3%, P = 0.013). Hernia defect size was significantly larger in patients who received ciNPWT (202.0 versus 143.4 cm 2 , P = 0.010). Overall SSO was similar between the two groups (23.2% versus 26.3%, P = 0.663). At a mean follow-up of 6.6 months, hernia recurrence rate was significantly higher in the SSD group compared with that in the ciNPWT group. (10.5% versus 0%, P = 0.027). Smoking, diabetes, component separation, mesh type, and location were not significantly associated with hernia recurrence. Conclusions: Application of incisional NPWT is beneficial in decreasing hernia recurrence in VHR-PAN, compared with standard dressings. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further elucidate the utility of ciNPWT in abdominal wall reconstruction.

Background: Traditional citation-based metrics do not capture the dissemination of upper extremity lymphedema (UEL) research that occurs online and in mainstream media. There is limited literature reporting the most impactful UEL articles based on citation rate and/or online mentions. We sought to use the Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) to determine the most impactful UEL articles in online media and to report trends in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of complications. Methods: The Altmetric database was queried to identify all published articles regarding the management, diagnosis, and prevention of complications seen in the setting of UEL. Extracted data points included article topic and type, journal, and number of online mentions on several platforms. Results: Our index search yielded 638 studies published between 2000 and 2021. Fifty articles with the highest AAS scores were included for analysis. The median AAS was 27.5, but the top four articles had AAS scores that were substantially higher (AAS ≥ 334) than all other studies. Of the top 50 articles, 68% (34/50) were original research. Of those, 23.5% (8/34) were randomized control trials. The most common article topic was the treatment of UEL (36%; 18/50) followed by diagnostic methods of UEL (30%; 15/50). There were a total of 1156 Twitter mentions (median:14) for the top 50 articles. Of all media platforms, news mentions correlated most strongly with AAS (R 2 = 0.99, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that alternative metrics measure distinct components of article impact and add an important dimension to understanding the overall impact of published research on UEL.