Object. The Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) protein-a developmentally regulated transcription factor-is aberrantly expressed in gliomas and promotes their malignant phenotype. However, little is known about the molecular allies that help it mediate its oncogenic functions in glioma cells.Methods. The authors used short interfering RNA (siRNA) to suppress WT1 expression in glioblastoma (GBM) cells and evaluated the effect of this on GBM cell invasiveness. Gene expression analysis was then used to identify the candidate genes that were altered as a result of WT1 silencing. One candidate target, CD97, was then selected for further investigation into its role by suppressing its expression using siRNA silencing, followed by proliferation and invasion assays.Results. WT1 levels were reliably and reproducibly suppressed by siRNA application. This resulted in a significant decrease in cellular invasiveness. Microarray analyses identified the gene products that were consistently downregulated (27) and upregulated (11) with WT1 silencing. Of these, CD97 expression was consistently suppressed across the 3 different GBM cell lines studied and was found on further investigation to significantly impact GBM cell invasiveness.Conclusions. Although CD97 expression in gliomas has not been described previously, we conclude that the possible upregulation of CD97 mediated by WT1 promotes cellular invasiveness-one of the most characteristic and challenging aspects of glial tumor cells. Further studies are needed to clarify the nature of this regulation and its impact, as CD97 could represent a novel target for antiglioma therapies. (http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2011.11.JNS111455) Key Words • Wilms tumor 1 • glioblastoma • invasiveness • target genes • oncology 843Abbreviations used in this paper: ATP = adenosine triphosphate; EGF = epidermal growth factor; GBM = glioblastoma; PDGF = platelet-derived growth factor; qRT-PCR = quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction; SDS = sodium dodecyl sulfate; siRNA = short interfering RNA; VCU = Virginia Commonwealth University; WT1 = Wilms tumor 1.

Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) is a transcription factor with a multitude of downstream targets that have wide-ranging effects in non-glioma cell lines. Though its expression in glioblastomas is now well-documented, the role of WT1 in these tumors remains poorly defined. We hypothesized that WT1 functions as an oncogene to enhance glioblastoma viability and chemoresistance. WT1's role was examined by studying the effect of WT1 silencing and overexpression on DNA damage, apoptosis and cell viability. Results indicated that WT1 silencing adversely affected glioblastoma viability, at times, in synergy with 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) and cisplatin. To investigate other mechanisms through which WT1 could affect viability, we measured cell cycle distribution, senescence, and autophagy. WT1 silencing had no effect on these processes. Lastly, we examined WT1 regulation of IGF-1R expression. Counterintuitively, upregulation of IGF-1R was evident after WT1 silencing. In conclusion, WT1 functions as a survival factor in glioblastomas, possibly through inhibition of IGF-1R expression.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common type of primary brain tumor, and current treatment regimens are only marginally effective. One of the most vexing and malignant aspects of GBM is its pervasive infiltration into surrounding brain tissue. This review describes the role of the Wilms tumor 1 gene (WT1) and its relationship to GBM. WT1 has several alternative splicing products, one of which, the KTS+ variant, has been demonstrated to be involved in the transcriptional activation of a variety of oncogenes as well as the inhibition of tumor suppressor genes. Further, this paper will examine the relationship of WT1 with CD97, a gene that codes for an epidermal growth factor receptor family member, an adhesion G-protein–coupled receptor, thought to promote tumor invasiveness and migration. The authors suggest that further research into WT1 and CD97 will allow clinicians to begin to deal more effectively with the infiltrative behavior displayed by GBM and design new therapies that target this deadly disease.

Background: Aurora-A (AURKA) belongs to the family of serine-threonine kinases that are crucial for cell cycle control. In particular, AURKA controls centrosome function, mitotic spindle formation, and proper chromosome segregation. In contrast to the well-defined function of AURKA in normal cells, the role of AURKA in malignant transformation and cancer progression is still under investigation. Here, we report that AURKA directly interacts with MEK1/2 kinase and induces chemotaxis of breast cancer cells. Results: We demonstrated that overexpression of AURKA in luminal ER+ MCF-7 cells (MCF-7AURKA) resulted in over 10-fold increase in the number of cells displaying chemotactic response upon stimulation with growth factors when compared to parental MCF-7 cells. Both AURKA inhibitor MLN8237 and MEK1/2 inhibitor PD0325901 reduced migratory properties of MCF-7AURKA cells. In contrast, treatment with the pan RAF inhibitor TAK-632 did not affect chemotactic response of MCF-7AURKA cells. We demonstrated colocalization of AURKA and MEK1/2 immunofluorescence signals in MCF-7AURKA and triple-negative BT549 cells. In situ proximity ligation assay (PLA) revealed the presence of AURKA-MEK1/2 complexes in MCF-7AURKA and BT549 cells, and the notion that AURKA and MEK1/2 formed cellular complexes was confirmed with co-immunoprecipitation experiments. In vitro kinase assays with recombinant AURKA and MEK1 proteins showed that AURKA kinase could directly phosphorylate MEK1. Incubation of MCF-7AURKA and BT549 cells with the AURKA-specific inhibitors MLN8237 or MK8745 resulted in over a 2-fold increase in the level of pERK1/2 compared to the untreated controls. Treatment with the pan RAF inhibitor TAK-632 did not diminish MLN8237-induced pERK1/2, whereas treatment with the MEK1/2 specific inhibitor PD0325901 completely abrogated MLN8237-induced activation of ERK1/2. Conclusions: Our data present a novel AURKA-MEK1/2 interaction that contributes to the increased chemotaxis of breast cancer cells. The results suggest that AURKA negatively regulates MEK1 through a novel, direct phosphorylation event, possibly leading to constitutive activation of MEK2 and increased chemotaxis. The combined treatment of AURKA and MEK1/2 inhibitors represents a new therapeutic approach to decrease metastatic potential of breast cancer cells and delay tumor progression. The in-depth analysis of the AURKA-MEK1/2 complexes as well as in vivo studies testing the efficacy of combining AURKA and MEK1/2 inhibitors on patient-derived xenografts are currently in progress. Citation Format: Malgorzata Gil, Archana Chidambaram, Thaer Khoury, Kazuaki Takabe, Igor Puzanov, Irwin H. Gelman, Antonino B. D’Assoro, Evanthia Galanis, Mateusz Opyrchal. AURKA interaction with MEK1/2 complex and its role in promoting breast cancer cell metastasis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Advances in Breast Cancer Research; 2017 Oct 7-10; Hollywood, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2018;16(8_Suppl):Abstract nr A60.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Aurora A (AURKA) is a mitotic kinase responsible for centrosome segregation and mitotic spindle formation. In normal cells, expression of AURKA is highly regulated and is predominantly restricted to G2/M phases of the cell cycle. Unlike healthy cells, cancer cells overexpress AURKA through all phases of the cell cycle resulting in the acquisition of alternate non-mitotic functions. Little is known about cellular functions regulated by AURKA and its interaction with other signaling molecules. Here, we report a novel interaction between AURKA and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in wild type BRAF breast cancer cells as well as demonstrate an additive cytotoxic effect of AURKA- and MEK1/2-specific inhibitors against estrogen positive (ER+) and triple negative (ER-, PR-, HER2-) breast cancer cells. Results: We show that treatment of ER+ HER2- MCF-7, ER- HER2+ SKBR3 and ER- HER2- BT549 cells with AURKA specific inhibitors alisertib, MK8745 and Aurora A Inhibitor I resulted in over 2-fold increase in the levels of both pMEK1/2 and pERK1/2 compared to the untreated controls. The activation of the MAPK pathway was rapid with changes seen within 5 min after treatment with AURKA inhibitors and was sustained for at least 48 hours. No differences in phosphorylation of MEK1/2 or ERK1/2 were observed in BRAFG464V triple negative MDA-MB-231 cells. Treatment with AURKA inhibitors resulted in downregulation of pAURKA and a significant increase in levels of total AURKA protein. The pull-down assay with Ras-binding domain coated agarose beads followed by western blot analysis with anti-pan-RAS Ab revealed no changes in active GTP-bound RAS in alisertib-treated MCF-7 cells compared to the untreated control. Consistently, no significant changes were observed in RAS-inducible phosphorylation of RAF1 activation site at Ser338 as demonstrated by western blot. Treatment with the pan RAF inhibitor TAK-632 did not diminish alisertib-induced pERK and pMEK1/2. Alternatively, treatment with the MEK1/2 specific inhibitor PD0325901 completely abrogated alisertib-induced phosphorylation of MEK1/2 and ERK1/2. Furthermore, combined treatment of alisertib and PD0325901 in vitro revealed significant additive cytotoxic effect in MCF-7 and BT549 cells when compared to either agent used alone (p< 0.008 and p<0.011; p <0.04 and p<0.028). Conclusions: Our data suggests that AURKA is a RAF1-independent negative regulator of MAPK activity in breast cancer cells. The in-depth analysis of the AURKA-MEK1/2 interaction is currently under investigation. The results reveal a promising new strategy for the treatment of wild type BRAF, TNBC patients using a combination of AURKA and MEK1/2 inhibitors. Citation Format: Malgorzata Gil, Archana Chidambaram, Thaer Khoury, Kazuaki Takabe, Igor Puzanov, Irwin Gelman, Antonio D’Assoro, Mateusz Opyrchal. Inhibition of AURKA induces Raf1-independent activation of MAPK pathway in breast cancer cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2123. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-2123