No abstract

No abstract

Steel shear panels in combination with bracing are a novel form of steel shear walls that eliminate large distributed loads to impose on primary beams along with columns. This paper presents the results of a comparative experimental program on two types of steel shear panels with and without stiffeners. For this purpose, the proposed quasi-static cyclic loading history of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 461 was applied on two full-scale specimens. Structural steel was selected as the material of the panels, which were welded to the surrounding boundary elements. In addition, using finite element models, performed tests were simulated and scaling effects were investigated. This study identified that steel shear panels have acceptable hysteretic behavior in addition to excellent ductility, which cause more dissipation of induced seismic energy. Comparison of seismic performance of two types of steel shear panels and high cost of setting up stiffeners demonstrate that unstiffened shear panel is a reliable selection for seismicresisting systems. The results of numerical study show that acceleration-based similitude laws have acceptable estimation for responses of scaled models.

This paper introduces a new earthquake-resistant building design featuring eccentrically braced frames with steel wall shear panels. It also proposes closed-form expressions for analysis and extension of the existing failure mode control design method for the new structural system. Closed-form equations for internal forces were obtained, and probable failure mechanisms and corresponding lateral load multipliers for secondary effects were identified. Selection of member profiles was completed by the mechanism equilibrium curve concept. Pushover modelling was then performed with plastic hinge distribution corresponding to failure mechanisms. Only small differences were found between the analytical and modelled values of lateral force multipliers, meaning that the closed-form equations are a valid alternative approach for plastic analysis and design of eccentrically braced frames with shear panels.

Conventional design methods do not ensure that the desired collapse mechanism is developed at target displacement. In this paper, a case study is presented to analyze concentrically braced frames with steel shear panel (CBFSP). Also, extensive investigation in the failure modes are made, to have the global yielding mode at the final state. For this purpose, each of one-story, three-story, six-story and nine-story CBFSP models were decomposed into three parts where the members' closed-form equations of internal forces were identified and superimposed. On the basis of the kinematic theorem of plastic collapse, the possible mechanisms and the related energy equations were defined to estimate the lateral load multiplier. First, the shear panels, columns, vertical and horizontal boundary elements were designed using the values of internal forces and seismic loads. Next, sections of the beams and braces were selected by constraining, where the mechanism equilibrium curve of the desired mechanism had to be placed below the others within the admissible roof displacement. Finally, for assessment of the precision of the method, results of the pushover analysis of the finite element models were compared with the theoretical ones. The findings show that, despite more effort for design, the investigated method is reliable and satisfactory.

Through the combination of two types of seismic resisting systems including braced frames and steel shear walls, braced steel shear panel systems can be formed. This new lateral load-resisting system solves some of the defects of current special steel shear walls, such as imposing significant loads on boundary elements along with gravity load effects. Analysis and design of this new structural system underline the importance of having simple and precise finite-element models. To this aim, this paper presents two types of equivalent braced frames termed ‘overall equivalent brace’ and ‘equivalent mid-brace’. The equations of brace area, material strength and strain-hardening ratio are obtained in two states of considering both braces or regardless of compressive brace. Next, non-linear lateral displacement, yield and ultimate values of base shear of one-storey and three-storey equivalent models are compared with the results of strip models. The findings show that the proposed models can obtain acceptable results by considering both braces only with equivalent area along with material strength.

No abstract

No abstract