Regulation of microtubule dynamic instability is crucial for cellular processes, ranging from mitosis to membrane transport. Stathmin (also known as oncoprotein 18/Op18) is a prominent microtubule destabilizer that acts preferentially on microtubule minus ends. Stathmin has been studied intensively because of its association with multiple types of cancer, but its mechanism of action remains controversial. Two models have been proposed. One model is that stathmin promotes microtubule catastrophe indirectly, and does so by sequestering tubulin; the other holds that stathmin alters microtubule dynamics by directly destabilizing growing microtubules. Stathmin's sequestration activity is well established, but the mechanism of any direct action is mysterious because stathmin binds to microtubules very weakly. To address these issues, we have studied interactions between stathmin and varied tubulin polymers. We show that stathmin binds tightly to Dolastatin-10 tubulin rings, which mimic curved tubulin protofilaments, and that stathmin depolymerizes stabilized protofilament-rich polymers. These observations lead us to propose that stathmin promotes catastrophe by binding to and acting upon protofilaments exposed at the tips of growing microtubules. Moreover, we suggest that stathmin's minus-end preference results from interactions between stathmin's N terminus and the surface of α-tubulin that is exposed only at the minus end. Using computational modeling of microtubule dynamics, we show that these mechanisms could account for stathmin's observed activities in vitro, but that both the direct and sequestering activities are likely to be relevant in a cellular context. Taken together, our results suggest that stathmin can promote catastrophe by direct action on protofilament structure and interactions.Zn-sheets | GMPCPP | T 2 S complex | computer simulation

No abstract

Cosedimentation assays and fluorescence microscopy are used to show that microtubules (MTs) induce Tau filament formation under normal MT-binding assay conditions. This filament formation explains the striking inconsistencies in previously reported Tau–MT affinities and may provide a new model for Tau filament formation in Alzheimer's disease.

No abstract

EB1 is a highly conserved microtubule (MT) plus end tracking protein (+TIP) involved in regulating MT dynamics, but the mechanisms of its effects on MT polymerization remain undefined. Resolving this question requires understanding how EB1 interacts with MTs. Previous electron microscopy of the S. pombe EB1 homolog Mal3p suggested that Mal3p binds specifically to the MT seam, implying that EB1 family members promote MT polymerization by stabilizing the seam. However, more recent electron microscopy indicates that Mal3p binds everywhere except the seam. Neither set of experiments investigated the behavior of human EB1, or provided an explanation for why these studies arrived at different answers. To resolve these questions, we have used a combination of MT-binding assays and theoretical modeling with MTBindingSim. Our results indicate that human EB1 binds to the lattice, consistent with the recent Mal3p results, and show that Mal3p-binding assays that were previously interpreted as evidence for preferential seam binding are equally consistent with weak lattice binding. In addition, we used analytical ultracentrifugation to investigate the possibility that the EB1 monomer–dimer equilibrium might contribute to EB1 binding behavior, and determined that the EB1 dimerization dissociation constant is approximately 90 nM. We and others find that the cellular concentration of EB1 is on the order of 200 nM, suggesting that a portion of EB1 may be monomeric at physiological concentrations. These observations lead us to suggest that regulation of EB1 dimerization might play a role in controlling EB1 function.