Jails and prisons have become hotbeds of COVID-19 outbreaks. Various policies, such as improving access to medical care for inmates, providing soap and hand sanitizer to improve hygiene, and releasing some inmates to facilitate social distancing, have been proposed as ways to mitigate the spread of the virus in these facilities. Across 2 studies, we examined the factors underlying support for policies aimed at reducing the spread of COVID-19 in jails (n = 132) and prisons (n = 125) and yielded 3 key findings. Factors found in prior research to be associated with desire for punitive responses—namely, negative attitudes toward offenders and, to a lesser extent, lack of trust in the criminal justice system—were found to underlie lack of support for all types of COVID-19 mitigation policies. Concern related to COVID-19—namely, perceptions of personal risk of contracting the virus—was related to increased support for policies to curb the spread of the virus among inmates. Social media consumption and reliance on social media for news regarding COVID-19 demonstrated inconsistent relationships with support for policies. These findings suggest that factors related to support for harsh treatment of offenders and concerns related to the present situation both contribute to support for criminal justice policy during a crisis situation like a pandemic. The recommended policies offer hope for reducing the negative impact of COVID-19 among justice-involved people. We offer suggestions on tailoring messaging to improve public support for these policies.
The Youth and Young Adults Cancer Knowledge Attitudes and Practices (C-KAP) exploratory study in 2 rural underserved areas in a border community. C-KAP is an interdisciplinary research pilot project led by university scholars in psychology and social work in partnership with community partners. The exploratory cross-sectional mix-method study recruited 141 (n =141) youth and young adults (ages 18-39). This study was informed on empirical research and a bilingual online questionnaire was field-tested, and data was collected via QuestionPro Software. Quantitative analysis was conducted using SPSS version 27. Descriptive statistics and frequency analysis were used for demographics and basic statistics. Chi square tests and Fisher’s exact tests between variables were ran to find statistically significant associations. For the qualitative data, independent coders conducted recurrent content analysis to identify themes. Salient themes include knowledge about cancer types; access to health care; prevention; and the perceived impact of COVID-19 pandemic. Findings highlight a lack of knowledge and orientation on cancer in youth and young adults suggesting the need for community tailored education and screening interventions. Other findings reflect gender differences in knowledge and practices, which indicates that a gender-specific lens is needed when delivering education.
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted existing disparities in healthcare and
public policies in the United States. Although measures such as social
distancing and hygiene behaviors have been advocated for, many were
impossible to do for certain populations, leaving them at greater risk
of contracting and spreading the virus. Conditions in immigration
detention facilities have long been criticized, but deficiencies in
sanitation and safety exponentiated the spread of COVID-19 in these
facilities. The current studies assess the primary factors that underlie
support of policies designed to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 in
immigration detention centers. We hypothesized that fear of COVID may
overtake attitudes towards immigrants in predictive strength of policy
support. Data gathered in Summer of 2020 (n=141) and Spring of 2021
(n=137) were analyzed using regression analyses to identify attitudes
and variables most predictive of policy support. Contrary to our
hypothesis, perceived risk of COVID-19 did not predict attitudes in
either study. Rather, results indicate that attitudes towards immigrants
proved to be the most significant predictor of support for these
policies. The results indicate that negative attitudes towards
immigrants remain the most impactful factors in support of policies
aimed at reducing illness and death, even during a worldwide pandemic.
Individuals experiencing homelessness face disproportionate rates of chronic health and mental conditions, disparities, and other disadvantages that contribute to being unsheltered and that call out to social workers at the micro and macro levels—in collaboration with colleagues across professional and service sectors—to examine, mitigate, and eliminate. This mixed-methods study documented the social and health determinants that put people experiencing homelessness at risk for chronic conditions that may lead to increased cancer risk, using a survey created by the research team and administered to 74 (n=74) unhoused male and female adults over the age of 18. We hypothesized that lack of access to healthcare perpetuates chronic disease and may increase cancer risk. The findings suggest areas where social workers—in keeping with the profession’s values of service, dignity and worth of the person, and social justice— must advocate for health education, screenings, care, engage in policy work, and drive further research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.