No abstract

This study aimed at analyzing the compomers wear by an "in vitro" toothbrushing abrasion test. The null hypotheses tested were that there would be no differences in weight loss and no significant changes in surface roughness of the compomers after this test. The utilized commercial brands were Dyract (Dentsply), Dyract AP (Dentsply), Compoglass F (Vivadent), Freedom (SDI), F2000 (3M ESPE), which were compared to the two resin composites Z100 (3M ESPE) and Silux Plus (3M ESPE). Ten cylindrical specimens for each commercial brand were prepared with 5mm diameter and 3mm thickness. An appropriate machine with soft bristle tips containing dentifrice solution and deionized water was used. A total of 100,000 brushing cycles were performed. The amount of weight loss was measured by the percentage alteration between the initial (before toothbrushing) and final weight (after toothbrushing), measured by a Sartorius analytical balance. The surface roughness change was determined by the percentage difference between initial and final means after 5 tracings by a T 1000 Hommel Tester roughness meter on the specimen's surfaces before and after toothbrushing abrasion test. The statistical analysis (Students paired t-test, ANOVA and Tukey, á=0.05) showed that all materials presented statistically significant weight loss and roughness increase after abrasion test. All compomers presented higher weight loss than resin composites. Freedom and Dyract AP presented the lowest weight loss among compomers. F2000 presented the worst abrasion resistance, without statistical differences with Dyract. For roughness changes, Dyract, Dyract AP, Z100, Compoglass F and Silux Plus showed the lowest surface roughness alteration, in increasing order, without statistical differences between them. Freedom was the statistically roughest material of the study.

No abstract

Thirty single-rooted teeth were prepared to receive cast posts. After cementation of the post the teeth were divided into three groups. Group I did not receive any treatment, whereas the posts in groups II and III were treated with an ultrasonic device, for 2 min and 5 min, respectively. The force required for post removal was determined using a universal test machine. No statistical differences (P > 0.05) were found between the groups where ultrasound had been used. Significantly reduced forces were necessary to remove the posts from group II and III, compared with group I which did not receive ultrasonic treatment (P < 0.05).

Thirty single-rooted teeth were prepared to receive cast posts. After cementation of the post the teeth were divided into three groups. Group I did not receive any treatment, whereas the posts in groups II and III were treated with an ultrasonic device, for 2 min and 5 min, respectively. The force required for post removal was determined using a universal test machine. No statistical differences (P > 0.05) were found between the groups where ultrasound had been used. Significantly reduced forces were necessary to remove the posts from group II and III, compared with group I which did not receive ultrasonic treatment (P < 0.05).

No abstract

SUMMARYPurpose: To compare marginal leakage and gap formation in large resin composite Class II cavities with their gingival margins in cementum, using three different additional retentions in the proximal box. Methods: Standardized large Class II MOD cavities with gingival margins in cementum were prepared in 40 recently extracted molars and divided into four groups according to their retention in the proximal box: (G1) no retention; (G2) vertical grooves in the buccal and lingual walls; (G3) "pot holes" in the gingival wall and (G4) horizontal grooves in the gingival wall. All groups were restored with the incremental technique using the same resin composite (QuiXfil, Dentsply) and a bonding agent (Prime Bond NT, Dentsply). After polishing, all of the restored teeth were immersed in dye solution and submitted to simultaneous cyclic loading. Impressions of the gingival margins were made before and after loading, and epoxy resin replicas were evaluated for gap formation using a scanning electron microscope. Results: All groups with additional retention (G2=0.565, G3=0.346 and G4=0.078) showed fewer gap formations than the control group (G1=2.076). Similar results were found for microleakage tests. All groups presented an increase in gap extension after loading, with the exception of the group with gingival retention grooves (G4). G4 showed the best results in relation to both parameters. There was a low correlation between gap extension and microleakage.

No abstract