The Thai Constitutional Court has recently dealt with more cases concerning constitutional rights such as those involving abortion and same-sex marriage, gaining widespread public attention similar to its many cases on political issues. This new development may show that the Court has now performed its role as a constitutional guardian and bulwark of rights. But the expansion of the caseload on rights may promote judicial activism and thus indicate a new strategy for the Court to be more powerful. This article looks at both the substantive changes in the jurisprudence of the Court as well as the procedural adjustments in recent court cases to determine the extent to which the Court has transformed itself to the ideal image of a great constitutional court in a comparative context. The Article analyzes all constitutional rights cases decided since 2019 to gauge the overall performance of the Court. Moreover, the Article also provides some examples of cases that seemingly protect constitutional rights but simultaneously expand the powers of the Court in the future. The analysis then suggests that while the Court might have facially helped protect more rights, it comes with a cost of a potentially even more active and political Court.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.