Oral ulcer is the most common oral disease and leads to pain during meals and speaking, reducing the quality of life of patients. Recent evidence using animal models suggests that oral ulcers induce cyclooxygenase-dependent spontaneous pain and cyclooxygenase-independent mechanical allodynia. Endothelin-1 is upregulated in oral mucosal inflammation, although it has not been shown to induce pain in oral ulcers. In the present study, we investigated the involvement of endothelin-1 signaling with oral ulcer-induced pain using our proprietary assay system in conscious rats. Endothelin-1 was significantly upregulated in oral ulcers experimentally induced by topical acetic acid treatment, while endothelin-1 production was suppressed by antibacterial pretreatment. Spontaneous nociceptive behavior in oral ulcer model rats was inhibited by swab applications of BQ-788 (ET receptor antagonist), ONO-8711 (prostanoid receptor EP antagonist), and HC-030031 (TRPA1 antagonist). Prostaglandin E production in the ulcers was suppressed by BQ-788. Mechanical allodynia in the model was inhibited not only by BQ-788 and HC-030031 but also by BQ-123 (ET receptor antagonist), SB-366791 (TRPV1 antagonist), and RN-1734 (TRPV4 antagonist). In naive rats, submucosal injection of endothelin-1 caused mechanical allodynia that was sensitive to HC-030031 and SB-366791 but not to RN-1734. These results suggest that endothelin-1 production following oral bacterial invasion via ulcerative regions elicits TRPA1-mediated spontaneous pain. This pain likely occurs through an indirect route that involves ET receptor-accelerated prostanoid production. Endothelin-1 elicits directly TRPA1- and TRPV1-mediated mechanical allodynia via both ET and ET receptors on nociceptive fibers. The TRPV4-mediated allodynia component seems to be independent of endothelin signaling. These findings highlight the potential of endothelin signaling blockers as effective analgesic approaches for oral ulcer patients.

No abstract

No abstract

Texture has enormous effects on food preferences. The materials used to study texture discrimination also have tastes that experimental animal can detect; therefore, such studies must be designed to exclude taste differences. In this study, to minimize the effects of material tastes, we utilized high- and low-viscosity forms of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC-H and CMC-L, respectively) at the same concentrations (0.1–3%) for viscosity discrimination tests in rats. In two-bottle preference tests of water and CMC, rats avoided CMC-H solutions above 1% (63 mPa·s) but did not avoid less viscous CMC-L solutions with equivalent taste magnitudes, suggesting that rats spontaneously avoided high viscosity. To evaluate low-viscosity discrimination, we performed conditioned aversion tests to 0.1% CMC, which initially showed a comparable preference ratio to water in the two-bottle preference tests. Conditioning with 0.1% CMC-L (1.5 mPa·s) did not induce aversion to 0.1% CMC-L or CMC-H. However, rats acquired a conditioned aversion to 0.1% CMC-H (3.6 mPa·s) even after latent inhibition to CMC taste by pre-exposure to 0.1% CMC-L. These results suggest that rats can discriminate considerably low viscosity independent of CMC taste. This novel approach for viscosity discrimination can be used to investigate the mechanisms of texture perception in mammals.