In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, nuclear exosome along with TRAMP and DRN selectively eliminates diverse aberrant messages. These decay apparatuses appear to operate as independent mechanisms in the nucleus. Here, using genetic and molecular approach we systematically investigate the functional relationship between exosome, TRAMP and DRN mechanisms by examining their relative contributions in the degradation of diverse classes of aberrant nuclear mRNAs generated at various phases of mRNP biogenesis. Our findings suggest that nuclear exosome in association with the TRAMP complex exclusively degrades the transcription assembly-defective mRNPs and splice-defective intron-containing pre-mRNAs, whereas nuclear exosome along with DRN solely degrades the export-defective messages. The degradation of aberrant read-through transcripts with 3-extensions, in contrast, requires the activity of TRAMP and DRN together along with nuclear exosome function. Thus, the profile of substrate specificity of these nuclear decay machines reflects dependency of the nuclear exosome for either TRAMP or DRN function to degrade distinct nuclear mRNAs. We propose that DRN apparatus may act as a novel ancillary factor required for the nuclear exosome function to degrade specific classes of aberrant messages.

Nuclear degradation of aberrant mRNAs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is accomplished by the nuclear exosome and its cofactors TRAMP/CTEXT. Evidence from this investigation establishes a universal role of the Nrd1p-Nab3p-Sen1p (NNS) complex in the nuclear decay of all categories of aberrant mRNAs. In agreement with this, both nrd1-1 and nrd1-2 mutations impaired the decay of all classes of aberrant messages. This phenotype is similar to that displayed by GAL::RRP41 and rrp6-Δ mutant yeast strains. Remarkably, however, nrd1ΔCID mutation (lacking the C-terminal domain required for interaction of Nrd1p with RNAPII) only diminished the decay of aberrant messages with defects occurring during the early stage of mRNP biogenesis, without affecting other messages with defects generated later in the process. Co-transcriptional recruitment of Nrd1p on the aberrant mRNAs was vital for their concomitant decay. Strikingly, this recruitment on to mRNAs defective in the early phases of biogenesis is solely dependent upon RNAPII. In contrast, Nrd1p recruitment onto export-defective transcripts with defects occurring in the later stage of biogenesis is independent of RNAPII and dependent on the CF1A component, Pcf11p, which explains the observed characteristic phenotype of nrd1ΔCID mutation. Consistently, pcf11-2 mutation displayed a selective impairment in the degradation of only the export-defective messages.

Intracellular trafficking and localization of mRNAs provide a mechanism of regulation of expression of genes with excellent spatial control. mRNA localization followed by localized translation appears to be a mechanism of targeted protein sorting to a specific cell‐compartment, which is linked to the establishment of cell polarity, cell asymmetry, embryonic axis determination, and neuronal plasticity in metazoans. However, the complexity of the mechanism and the components of mRNA localization in higher organisms prompted the use of the unicellular organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a simplified model organism to study this vital process. Current knowledge indicates that a variety of mRNAs are asymmetrically and selectively localized to the tip of the bud of the daughter cells, to the vicinity of endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, and nucleus in this organism, which are connected to diverse cellular processes. Interestingly, specific cis‐acting RNA localization elements (LEs) or RNA zip codes play a crucial role in the localization and trafficking of these localized mRNAs by providing critical binding sites for the specific RNA‐binding proteins (RBPs). In this review, we present a comprehensive account of mRNA localization in S. cerevisiae, various types of localization elements influencing the mRNA localization, and the RBPs, which bind to these LEs to implement a number of vital physiological processes. Finally, we emphasize the significance of this process by highlighting their connection to several neuropathological disorders and cancers. This article is categorized under: RNA Export and Localization > RNA Localization

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the nuclear exosome/Rrp6p/TRAMP participates in the 3’-end processing of several precursor non-coding RNAs. Here we demonstrate that the depletion of nucleus-specific 3’→5’ exoribonuclease Rrp6p and its cofactor, Rrp47p led to the specific and selective enhancement of steady-state levels of mature small non-coding RNAs (sncRNAs) that include 5S and 5.8S rRNAs, snRNAs and snoRNAs, but not 18S and 25S rRNAs. Most importantly, their steady-state enhancement does not require the exosome, TRAMP, CTEXT, or Rrp6p-associated Mpp6p. Rrp6p/47p-dependent enhancement of the steady-state levels of sncRNAs is associated with the diminution of their nuclear decay-rate and requires their polyadenylation before targeting by Rrp6p, which is catalyzed by both the canonical and non-canonical poly(A) polymerases, Pap1p and Trf4p. Consistent with this finding, we also demonstrated that Rrp6p and Rrp47p exist as an exosome-independent complex. Thus, Rrp6p-Rrp47p defines a core nuclear exosome-independent novel turnover system that targets the small non-coding RNAs.