Most posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques use both tibial and femoral bone tunnels for graft placement. Because of the acute angle the graft must make to gain entrance into the tibial tunnel, abnormal stresses are placed on the graft that could lead to graft failure. An alternative technique for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction involves placement of the bone plug from the graft anatomically on the back of the tibia (inlay), preventing formation of an acute angle at the tibial attachment site. We used six pairs of human cadaver knees to compare the biomechanical properties of these two techniques. One knee from each pair underwent tunnel reconstruction while the other knee underwent inlay reconstruction. There was significantly less anterior-posterior laxity in the inlay group when compared with the tunnel group from 30 degrees to 90 degrees of knee flexion and after repetitive loading at 90 degrees of knee flexion. Evaluation of the grafts revealed evidence of mechanical degradation in the tunnel group but not in the inlay group. The inlay technique resulted in less posterior translation with less graft degradation than did the tunnel technique for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

No abstract

The use of a double-bundle graft may not offer any advantages over a single-bundle graft for tibial inlay posterior cruciate reconstructions.

Medial transfer of the tibial tuberosity has been commonly used for treatment of recurrent dislocation of the patella and patellofemoral malalignment. In this study, six fresh human cadaveric knees were used. Static intrajoint loads were recorded using Fuji Prescale pressure-sensitive film for contact pressure and contact area determination in a closed kinetic chain knee testing protocol. Peak pressures, average contact pressures, and contact areas of the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joints were calculated on native intact knee specimens and after tibial tuberosity transfer. All native intact knee specimens had a normal Q angle. Medialization of the tibial tuberosity significantly increased the patellofemoral contact pressure. Medial displacement of the tibial tuberosity also significantly increased the average contact pressure of the medial tibiofemoral compartment and changed the balance of tibiofemoral joint loading. The results of our study suggest that caution should be used when transferring a patellar tendon in the face of a preexisting normal Q angle as this will result in abnormally high peak pressure within the tibiofemoral joint. Overmedialization of the tibial tuberosity should be avoided in the varus knee, the knee after medial meniscectomy, and the knee with preexisting degenerative arthritis of the medial compartment.

Retrospective study: Level II.

Bone marrow-derived cells including osteoblastic progenitors can be concentrated rapidly from bone marrow aspirates using the surface of selected implantable matrices for selective cell attachment. Concentration of cells in this way to produce an enriched cellular composite graft improves graft efficacy. The current study was designed to test the hypothesis that the biologic milieu of a bone marrow clot will significantly improve the efficacy of such a graft. An established posterior spinal fusion model and cancellous bone matrix was used to compare an enriched cellular composite bone graft alone, bone matrix plus bone marrow clot, and an enriched bone matrix composite graft plus bone marrow clot. Union score, quantitative computed tomography, and mechanical testing were used to define outcome. The union score for the enriched bone matrix plus bone marrow clot composite was superior to the enriched bone matrix alone and the bone matrix plus bone marrow clot. The enriched bone matrix plus bone marrow clot composite also was superior to the enriched bone matrix alone in fusion volume and in fusion area. These data confirm that the addition of a bone marrow clot to an enriched cell-matrix composite graft results in significant improvement in graft performance. Enriched composite grafts prepared using this strategy provide a rapid, simple, safe, and inexpensive method for intraoperative concentration and delivery of bone marrow-derived cells and connective tissue progenitors that may improve the outcome of bone grafting.Autogenous cancellous bone is currently the most biologically effective graft material. However, harvest of autogenous bone is associated with significant morbidity: surgical scars, blood loss, pain, prolonged surgical time and rehabilitation, increased exposure to blood products, and infection risk.39 Effective alternatives to autograft could significantly improve the outcome of these procedures and reduce the cost.

Connective tissue progenitors can be concentrated rapidly from fresh bone marrow aspirates using some porous matrices as a surface for cell attachment and selective retention, and for creating a cellular graft that is enriched with respect to the number of progenitor cells. We evaluated the potential value of this method using demineralized cortical bone powder as the matrix. Matrix alone, matrix plus marrow, and matrix enriched with marrow cells were compared in an established canine spinal fusion model. Fusions were compared based on union score, fusion mass, fusion volume, and by mechanical testing. Enriched matrix grafts delivered a mean of 2.3 times more cells and approximately 5.6 times more progenitors than matrix mixed with bone marrow. The union score with enriched matrix was superior to matrix alone and matrix plus marrow. Fusion volume and fusion area also were greater with the enriched matrix. These data suggest that the strategy of selective retention provides a rapid, simple, and effective method for concentration and delivery of marrowderived cells and connective tissue progenitors that may improve the outcome of bone grafting procedures in various clinical settings. Bone grafting is widely used in orthopaedic surgery to treat acute fractures, fracture nonunions, and bone defects, and to achieve therapeutic arthrodesis. Each year, approximately 500,000 bone grafting procedures are done on patients in the United States. 4 The efficacy of the grafts used in these procedures generally is considered to be derived from their osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties. 2 , 10 , 14 , 22 Osteoconduction can be defined as a scaffold function provided by a graft material that facilitates the attachment and migration of cells that contribute to new tissue formation.

No abstract