The use of blue-light filtering IOLs is more advisable because they are capable of protecting the retina against ultraviolet light without disturbance of contrast sensitivity and chromatic vision, which produces subjective impairment in visual function.

A significant reduction in spherical aberration after Tecnis Z9000 IOL implantation was achieved, but visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were not affected by the aspheric silicone IOL compared to spherical acrylic IOLs.

No abstract

In diabetic patients, the AcrySof Natural IOL provides better contrast sensitivity than the AcrySof SA60AT. The blue-light filter of the AcrySof Natural IOL did not cause chromatic discrimination defects based on total error scores and improved color vision in the blue-yellow chromatic axis in diabetic patients.

No abstract

Astigmatic keratotomy increased higher-order corneal aberrations, both coma-like and spherical-like, whereas LASIK performed after AK increased the spherical-like aberration and reduced the coma-like aberration.

PURPOSE: To compare the effects on contrast sensitivity of the IntraLase femtosecond laser for flap creation (IntraLASIK) and standard LASIK for myopia. METHODS: Two hundred eyes of 100 consecutive patients underwent LASIK treatment using the VISX S2 laser system. The femtosecond laser (15 kHz IntraLase) was used for flap creation in 100 eyes (50 patients) and a mechanical microkeratome (Carriazo-Barraquer) was used in 100 eyes (50 patients). Best spectacle-corrected contrast sensitivity was measured before and 6 months postoperatively in the IntraLASIK and mechanical LASIK groups. The IntraLASIK and mechanical LASIKinduced changes in contrast sensitivity were compared under photopic (85 cd/m2) and mesopic (5, 2.5, and 0.1 cd/m2) conditions. RESULTS: Contrast sensitivity for eyes after IntraLASIK did not differ from preoperative values at the photopic level (85 cd/m2). However, under mesopic conditions, a statistically significant reduction (P<.01) in contrast sensitivity was found at high spatial frequencies (12 and 18 cpd), although no significant contrast sensitivity differences were observed at low and middle spatial frequencies (P>.01 for 1.5, 3, and 6 cpd). No statistically significant differences were found between IntraLASIK and mechanical LASIK for 1.5,3, and 6 cpd at any luminance level (P>.01). IntraLASIK showed better contrast sensitivity than mechanical LASIK under mesopic conditions at 12 cpd and photopic and mesopic conditions at 18 cpd (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: IntraLASIK surgery demonstrated better contrast sensitivity at high spatial frequencies under photopic and mesopic conditions than mechanical LASIK. [J Refract Surg. 2007;23:188-192.]

This study suggests that brimonidine tartrate 0.2% administered before intraLASIK provides a reduction in the incidence of subconjunctival hemorrhage, hyperemia, and photophobia without increasing flap complications.