The purpose of this study was to analyze the change in antagonist co-activation ratio of upper-limb muscle pairs, during the reaching movement, of both ipsilesional and contralesional limbs of post-stroke subjects. Nine healthy and nine post-stroke subjects were instructed to reach and grasp a target, placed in the sagittal and scapular planes of movement. Surface EMG was recorded from postural control and movement related muscles. Reaching movement was divided in two sub-phases, according to proximal postural control versus movement control demands, during which antagonist co-activation ratios were calculated for the muscle pairs LD/PM, PD/AD, TRIlat/BB and TRIlat/BR. Post-stroke's ipsilesional limb presented lower co-activation in muscles with an important role in postural control (LD/PM), comparing to the healthy subjects during the first sub-phase, when the movement was performed in the sagittal plane (p<0.05). Conversely, the post-stroke's contralesional limb showed in general an increased co-activation ratio in muscles related to movement control, comparing to the healthy subjects. Our findings demonstrate that, in post-stroke subjects, the reaching movement performed with the ipsilesional upper limb seems to show co-activation impairments in muscle pairs associated to postural control, whereas the contralesional upper limb seems to have signs of impairment of muscle pairs related to movement.

An inertial data acquisition system was designed and developed as a low-cost option for monitoring rehabilitation. The device seeks to ease the data-gathering process by physiotherapists to complement current practices with accelerometry profiles and aid the development of quantifiable methodologies and protocols.

This study focused on the effects of pneumothorax size quantification in digital radiology environments when a quantification method is selected according to the radiologist's criteria. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of factors, including the radiologist (with different experience), displays (medical-grade and consumer-grade displays), or display calibration, on the Rhea, Collins, and Light quantification methods. This study used a factorial design with 76 cases, including 16 pneumothorax cases observed by six radiologists on three displays with and without the DICOM standard calibration. The gold standard was established by two radiologists by using computed tomography. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the pneumothorax sizes. For the three quantifications methods, none of the evaluated factors were significant. We conclude that radiologists, displays, and calibration do not significantly affect the quantification of pneumothorax size in different digital radiology environments.