In this paper, I consider the Kallias Letters in connection with Kant's account of moral action in order to analyse Schiller's characterisation of Kant's conception of constraint as aesthetically repugnant. I show how Schiller treats the difficulties inherent to the dualistic view that human beings consist in irreducibly sensible and rational natures. After elucidating the fundamental distinctions between Kant's and Schiller's views, I argue that, although Schiller's charge of repugnance appears too weak to pose a serious threat to Kant's ethics, it nevertheless indicates a significant problem in Kant's dualistic conception of the human being.In March 1782, a text entitled "A Magnanimous Act from Most Recent History" appeared anonymously in the Wirtembergisches Repertorium der Litteratur. 1 The author of this text, Friedrich Schiller, wrote about the distinction between two extremes coexisting within the human being, that is, the angelic and the demonic. For Schiller, who was at that time a young physician, this distinction opens up, but fails to identify and reflect upon, a potential middle ground between these extremes, that is, the possibility of becoming a magnanimous agent. 2 Only two years have passed since the completion of his third medical dissertation, entitled On the Connection between the Animal and the Spiritual Nature in the Human Being, in which Schiller focussed on the sensible/rational human being as an inseparable whole. He considered this unity to be the key to the understanding of humanity, not only in its physiological nature but also in its moral vocation. 3 Schiller would remain driven by the possibility of reconciling the dualism of the sensible and rational in human nature throughout his life. In this paper, I concentrate on the Kallias Letters, composed more than a decade after the aforementioned medical dissertation, in which Schiller considered the human being as an entirety. These letters are mainly dedicated to the elucidation of a new theory of beauty. Nonetheless, within
In my contribution, I discuss the important role of moral anthropological questions in the development of Schiller’s theoretical thought. I underline the fact that Schiller’s philosophical questions in Jena are much closer to those he confronted in Stuttgart – much closer than is considered to be the case in contemporary Schiller scholarship. I show how this continuity becomes evident when we take into consideration the moral anthropological topics that continued to interest Schiller throughout his life. To ground my argument, I show that the concept of the“whole human being” (i. e. the concept of a human considered in its entirety, as both sensible and rational) constitutes the continuous characteristic of Schiller’s philosophical considerations.
Los conceptos kantianos de "facultad" y de "mente" frente a la lectura epigenética ANTONINO FALDUTO 1 Resumen En este artículo voy a estudiar la innovación radical que, en la historia de la filosofía, constituyen de los conceptos kantianos de "facultad" y "mente". Con este propósito me concentraré en el debate en torno a las facultades que tiene lugar en el siglo XVIII en Europa en general y, en particular, en Alemania. Terminaré mi análisis señalando de qué manera el término "facultad" sólo puede ser interpretado en conexión con la concepción filosófica pura de Kant sobre el concepto de "mente", la cual será distinguida de un análisis epigenético de tipo empírico acerca de la mente humana.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.