The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of exposure to antimalarial drugs at diagnosis of lupus nephritis on the outcome of the disease, especially renal failure, comorbid processes, and survival. We analyzed a cohort of 206 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis. Renal biopsies were categorized according to the classification proposed by the ISN/RPS in 2003. Exposure to antimalarial drugs (chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine) was defined as the use of these drugs before the diagnosis of lupus nephritis independent of dose and duration. Fifty-six (27%) patients had received antimalarials before the diagnosis of lupus nephritis. During the follow-up, these patients had a lower frequency of creatinine values >4 mg/dL (2% vs 11%, P = 0.029) and end-stage renal failure (2% vs 11%, P = 0.044) in comparison with those never treated with antimalarials. Patients exposed to antimalarials also had a lower frequency of hypertension (32% vs 50%, P = 0.027), infections (11% vs 29%, P = 0.006), and thrombotic events (5% vs 17%, P = 0.039). Twenty patients (10%) died during the study period. Patients exposed to antimalarials had a lower mortality rate at the end of the follow-up (2% vs 13% for those not exposed to antimalarials, P = 0.029). Multivariate analysis identified thrombosis and infections as statistically significant independent variables. Kaplan-Meier plots showed a lower rate of end-stage renal failure (log rank = 0.04) in patients exposed to antimalarials. In conclusion, exposure to antimalarials before the diagnosis of lupus nephritis was negatively associated with the development of renal failure, hypertension, thrombosis and infection, and with a better survival rate at the end of the follow-up. This, together with other published data, suggests that antimalarials should be considered a mandatory therapeutic option in all patients diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Context A variety of topical and systemic drugs are available to treat primary Sjögren syndrome, although no evidence-based therapeutic guidelines are currently available. Objective To summarize evidence on primary Sjögren syndrome drug therapy from randomized controlled trials. Data Sources We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for articles on drug therapy for primary Sjögren syndrome published between January 1, 1986, and April 30, 2010. Study Selection Controlled trials of topical and systemic drugs including adult patients with primary Sjögren syndrome were selected as the primary information source. Results The search strategy yielded 37 trials. A placebo-controlled trial found significant improvement in the Schirmer and corneal staining scores, blurred vision, and artificial tear use in patients treated with topical ocular 0.05% cyclosporine. Three placebocontrolled trials found that pilocarpine was associated with improvements in dry mouth (61%-70% vs 24%-31% in the placebo group) and dry eye (42%-53% vs 26%). Two placebo-controlled trials found that cevimeline was associated with improvement in dry mouth (66%-76% vs 35%-37% in the placebo group) and dry eye (39%-72% vs 24%-30%). Small trials (Ͻ20 patients) found no significant improvement in sicca outcomes for oral prednisone or hydroxychloroquine and limited benefits for immunosuppressive agents (azathioprine and cyclosporine). A large trial found limited benefits for oral interferon alfa-2a. Two placebo-controlled trials of infliximab and etanercept did not achieve the primary outcome (a composite visual analog scale measuring joint pain, fatigue, and dryness); neither did 2 small trials (Ͻ30 patients) testing rituximab, although significant results were observed in some secondary outcomes and improvement compared with baseline. Conclusions In primary Sjögren syndrome, evidence from controlled trials suggests benefits for pilocarpine and cevimeline for sicca features and topical cyclosporine for moderate or severe dry eye. Anti-tumor necrosis factor agents have not shown clinical efficacy, and larger controlled trials are needed to establish the efficacy of rituximab.

No abstract

We evaluated the prevalence and clinical significance of cardiovascular risk factors in a large series of patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS), focusing on the possible association with clinical and immunological SS features, the therapies administered, and the impact on cardiovascular disease. The study cohort included 312 patients fulfilling the 2002 classification criteria for primary SS, consecutively evaluated and followed in our department between 1984 and 2009. The control group consisted of 312 age- and sex-matched patients without systemic autoimmune diseases followed during the study period in a primary care centre. In comparison with the age- and sex-matched control group, patients with primary SS showed a higher frequency of diabetes mellitus (27% versus 13%, p < 0.001) and hypertriglyceridaemia (22% versus 15%, p = 0.023), and a lower frequency of hypertension (30% versus 46%, p < 0.001) and smoking (19% versus 31%, p < 0.001). The adjusted, multivariate analysis showed that SS patients with at least three cardiovascular risk factors had a higher mean age at SS diagnosis (p < 0.001), a higher frequency of liver involvement (p = 0.01) and central nervous system involvement (p = 0.001), higher mean levels of C-reactive protein (CRP, p = 0.001), a lower percentage of circulating gamma globulins (p = 0.001), and had received corticosteroids more frequently (p = 0.003) in comparison with patients without cardiovascular risk factors. Patients who had received corticosteroids showed a higher frequency of hypertension (37% versus 25%, p = 0.032), diabetes mellitus (37% versus 21%, p = 0.002), and hypertriglyceridaemia (33% versus 15%, p < 0.001). Patients with primary SS showed a twofold higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus and a 1.5-fold higher prevalence of hypertriglyceridaemia in comparison with primary care patients. Corticosteroid use was closely associated with cardiovascular risk factors. These results suggest that cardiovascular risk factors should be taken into account in the management of patients with primary SS and show the importance of recognizing and controlling both traditional and SS-related modifiable risk factors.