In obese patients evaluated before operation by PSG before bariatric surgery and managed accordingly, the severity of OSA, as assessed by the AHI, was not associated with the rate of perioperative complications. These results cannot determine whether unrecognized and untreated OSA increases risk.

In patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery, those who are younger, male, and who have been previously hospitalized for psychiatric disorders use more opioids in the first 48 h postoperatively.

No abstract

No abstract

Anesthesia for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is challenging for any anesthesiologist as the patients undergoing this procedure are among the most critically ill. Adding to the underlying complexity of OLT management is the rare complication of an intracardiac thrombus (ICT). Intracardiac thrombi can present following liver allograft reperfusion resulting in high morbidity and mortality. Currently there is no consensus treatment for ICT, and the gold standard for diagnosis is intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE); these 2 factors lead to a dangerous amalgam of the difficulty in diagnosing and treating the disease. We describe 2 separate cases in detail of ICT formation during OLT that were recognized and diagnosed with intraoperative TEE. These 2 cases highlight the important role of TEE in the management of ICT. A thorough literature review that follows analyzes our current understanding of ICT during OLT and the vital function of TEE by every anesthesiologists regardless of formal TEE training. Broader use of TEE during all OLTs can help narrow the anesthesiologist's differential diagnosis during the acute phases of transplantation and should be considered in all liver transplant surgeries.

No abstract

No abstract

Background The perioperative anesthesia care during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (S‐ICD) implantation is still evolving. Objective To assess the feasibility and safety of S‐ICD implantation with monitored anesthesia care (MAC) versus general anesthesia (GA) in a tertiary care center. Methods This is a single‐center retrospective study of patients undergoing S‐ICD implantation between October 2012 and May 2019. Patients were categorized into MAC and GA group based on the mode of anesthesia. Procedural success without escalation to GA was the primary endpoint of the study, whereas intraprocedural hemodynamics, need of pharmacological support for hypotension and bradycardia, length of the procedure, stay in the post‐anesthesia care unit, and postoperative pain were assessed as secondary endpoints. Results The study comprises 287 patients with MAC in 111 and GA in 176 patients. Compared to MAC, patients in GA group were younger and had a higher body mass index. All patients had successful S‐ICD implantation. Only one patient (0.9%) in the MAC group was converted to GA. Despite a similar baseline heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) in both groups, patients with GA had significantly lower HR and MAP during the procedure and more frequently required pharmacological hemodynamic support. Length of the procedure, stay in the postanesthesia care unit, and postoperative pain was similar in both groups. Conclusion This retrospective experience suggests that implantation of S‐ICD is feasible and safe with MAC. Use of GA is associated with more frequent administration of hemodynamic drugs during S‐ICD implantation.