No abstract

In the present systematic review with meta-analysis, we sought to determine the current strength of evidence for or against off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with regard to hard clinical end-points, graft patency and cost-effectiveness. We performed a meta-analysis of only randomized controlled trials (RCT) which reported at least one of the desired end-points including: (i) major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), (ii) all-cause mortality, (iii) myocardial infarction, (iv) cerebrovascular accident, (v) repeat revascularization, (vi) graft patency and (vii) cost-effectiveness. The pooled treatment effects [odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean difference, 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs)] were assessed using a fixed or random effects model. A total of 16 904 patients from 51 studies were identified after literature search of the major databases using a predefined keyword list. The incidence of MACCE did not differ between the groups, neither during the first 30 days (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.82-1.04) nor for the longest available follow-up (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.92-1.12). While the incidence of mid-term graft failure (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.09-1.72) and the need for repeat revascularization (OR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.33-1.80) was increased after off-pump surgery, on-pump surgery was associated with an increased occurrence of stroke (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.58-0.95), renal impairment (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.71-0.89) and mediastinitis (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.31-0.62). There was no difference with regard to hard clinical end-points between on- or off-pump surgery, including myocardial infarction or mortality. The present systematic review emphasizes that both off- and on-pump surgery provide excellent and comparable results in patients requiring surgical revascularization. The choice for either strategy should take into account the individual patient profile (comorbidities, life expectancy, etc.) and importantly, the surgeon's experience in performing on- or off-pump CABG in their routine practice.

No abstract

No abstract

The objective of this systematic literature review with meta-analysis was to determine the strength of evidence for a preoperative statin on the reduction of adverse postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Randomized controlled (RCT) and observational trials were searched in online databases that reported about the effects of preoperative statin therapy on major adverse clinical outcomes after cardiac surgery. Analysed outcomes included early all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke and renal failure using a priori-defined criteria. Effect estimates were calculated and are given as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using fixed- or random-effect models. Literature search of all major databases retrieved 2371 studies. After screening, a total of 54 trials were identified (12 RCT, 42 observational) that reported outcomes of 91 491 cardiac surgery patients with (n = 46 614; 51%) or without (n = 44 877; 49%) preoperative statin therapy. Preoperative statin use resulted in a 0.9% absolute risk (2.6 vs 3.5%) and a 31% odds reduction for early all-cause mortality (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.59-0.81; P< 0.0001). In addition, statin treatment before surgery was associated with a substantial reduction (P < 0.01) in the postoperative end-points AF (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.61-0.82), new-onset AF (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.54-0.85), stroke (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.74-0.93), stay on intensive care unit (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.14; 95% CI -0.23 to -0.03; P < 0.01) and in-hospital stay (WMD -0.57; 95% CI -0.76 to -0.38; P < 0.01). No statistical differences were found between groups with regard to myocardial infarction or renal failure. In conclusion, the current systematic review strengthens the evidence that preoperative statin therapy extends substantial clinical benefit to early postoperative outcomes in cardiac surgery patients.

No abstract

Management strategies for patients with femoral VA-ECMO support and severely impaired LV function must be reassessed to avoid insufficient LV unloading at an early stage of ECMO therapy. Early LV decompression should be considered in patients with insufficient unloading of the LV to prevent intra-cardiac thrombus formation.

Background: Cardiac surgery often represents the only treatment option in patients with infective endocarditis (IE). However, IE surgery may lead to a sudden release of inflammatory mediators, which is associated with the severity of postoperative organ dysfunction. We investigated the impact of hemoadsorption during IE surgery on postoperative organ dysfunction. Methods: This multi-center, randomized, non-blinded, controlled trial assigned patients undergoing cardiac surgery for IE to hemoadsorption [integration of CytoSorb® to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)] or control. The Primary outcome (ΔSOFA) was defined as the difference between the mean total postoperative sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA), calculated maximally to the 9th postoperative day, and the basal SOFA score. The analysis was by modified intention-to-treat. A predefined inter-group comparison was done using a linear mixed model for ΔSOFA including surgeon and baseline SOFA as fixed effect covariates and with the surgical center as random effect. The SOFA score assesses dysfunction in six organ systems, each scored from zero to four. Higher scores indicate worsening dysfunction. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality, durations of mechanical ventilation, vasopressor and renal replacement therapy. Cytokines were measured in the first 50 patients. Results: Between January 17, 2018 and January 31, 2020, A total of 288 patients were randomly assigned to hemoadsorption (n=142) or control (n=146). Four patients in the hemoadsorption and two in the control group were excluded as they did not undergo surgery. The primary outcome ΔSOFA did not differ between the hemoadsorption and the control group (1.79 ± 3.75 and 1.93 ± 3.53, respectively, 95% CI: −1.30 to 0.83, p=0.6766). Mortality at 30 days (21% hemoadsorption vs 22% control, p=0.782), the durations of mechanical ventilation, vasopressor and renal replacement therapy did not differ between groups. Levels of IL-1β and IL-18 at the end of CPB were significantly lower in the hemoadsorption than in the control group. Conclusions: This randomized trial failed to demonstrate a reduction in postoperative organ dysfunction through intraoperative hemoadsorption in patients undergoing cardiac surgery for IE. Although hemoadsorption reduced plasma cytokines at the end of CPB, there was no difference in any of the clinically relevant outcome points.