PALB2 interacts with BRCA2, and biallelic mutations in PALB2 (also known as FANCN), similar to biallelic BRCA2 mutations, cause Fanconi anemia. We identified monoallelic truncating PALB2 mutations in 10/923 individuals with familial breast cancer compared with 0/1,084 controls (P = 0.0004) and show that such mutations confer a 2.3-fold higher risk of breast cancer (95% confidence interval (c.i.) = 1.4-3.9, P = 0.0025). The results show that PALB2 is a breast cancer susceptibility gene and further demonstrate the close relationship of the Fanconi anemia-DNA repair pathway and breast cancer predisposition. PALB2 (for 'partner and localizer of BRCA2') encodes a recently discovered protein that interacts with BRCA2, is implicated in its nuclear localization and stability and is required for some functions of BRCA2 in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair1. In a paper in this issue, we show that biallelic PALB2 mutations are responsible for a subset of Fanconi anemia cases characterized by a phenotype similar to that caused by biallelic BRCA2 mutations2. Prompted by these observations, we investigated whether monoallelic PALB2 mutations confer susceptibility to breast cancer by sequencing the gene © 2007 Nature Publishing Group Correspondence should be addressed to N.R (nazneen.rahman@icr.ac.uk).. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS The study was designed by N.R. and M.R.S. The molecular analyses were performed by S.S., P.K., A.R., S.R., K.S., R.B., T.C., H.J. and S.H. under the direction of N.R. The statistical analyses were performed by D.T., A.E. and L.M. under the direction of D.F.E. The familial collections were initiated by D.G.E. and D.E. and were collected by the Breast Cancer Susceptibility Collaboration (UK). The manuscript was written by N.R. and M.R.S.Note: Supplementary information is available on the Nature Genetics website. COMPETING INTERESTS STATEMENTThe authors declare that they have no competing financial interests. We identified truncating PALB2 mutations in 10/923 (1.1%) independently ascertained individuals with familial breast cancer from separate families compared with 0/1,084 (0%) controls (P = 0.0004) ( Table 1 and Fig. 1a). Nine of the PALB2 mutations were in the 908 families with female breast cancer only (1.0%). One occurred in the 15 families (6.7%) with cases of both female and male breast cancer (P = 0.15). Although this observation requires further investigation, it suggests that PALB2 mutations may confer a higher relative risk of male breast cancer than female breast cancer, and BRCA2 mutations are known to confer a high relative risk of male breast cancer3. One proband with a PALB2 mutation developed melanoma at 47 years of age in addition to breast cancer at 56 years. Apart from this individual, there were no other malignancies other than breast cancer in individuals with PALB2 mutations. Two of four first-degree affected relatives of probands with PALB2 mutations also carried a PALB2 mutation. This pattern of incomplete segregation in affected relatives is typical of s...

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women in developed countries. To identify common breast cancer susceptibility alleles, we conducted a genome-wide association study in which 582,886 SNPs were genotyped in 3,659 cases with a family history of the disease and 4,897 controls. Promising associations were evaluated in a second stage, comprising 12,576 cases and 12,223 controls. We identified five new susceptibility loci, on chromosomes 9, 10 and 11 (P = 4.6 x 10(-7) to P = 3.2 x 10(-15)). We also identified SNPs in the 6q25.1 (rs3757318, P = 2.9 x 10(-6)), 8q24 (rs1562430, P = 5.8 x 10(-7)) and LSP1 (rs909116, P = 7.3 x 10(-7)) regions that showed more significant association with risk than those reported previously. Previously identified breast cancer susceptibility loci were also found to show larger effect sizes in this study of familial breast cancer cases than in previous population-based studies, consistent with polygenic susceptibility to the disease.

We identified constitutional truncating mutations of the BRCA1-interacting helicase BRIP1 in 9/1,212 individuals with breast cancer from BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation-negative families but in only 2/2,081 controls (P = 0.0030), and we estimate that BRIP1 mutations confer a relative risk of breast cancer of 2.0 (95% confidence interval = 1.2-3.2, P = 0.012). Biallelic BRIP1 mutations were recently shown to cause Fanconi anemia complementation group J. Thus, inactivating truncating mutations of BRIP1, similar to those in BRCA2, cause Fanconi anemia in biallelic carriers and confer susceptibility to breast cancer in monoallelic carriers.

Background:Data for multiple common susceptibility alleles for breast cancer may be combined to identify women at different levels of breast cancer risk. Such stratification could guide preventive and screening strategies. However, empirical evidence for genetic risk stratification is lacking.Methods:We investigated the value of using 77 breast cancer-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for risk stratification, in a study of 33 673 breast cancer cases and 33 381 control women of European origin. We tested all possible pair-wise multiplicative interactions and constructed a 77-SNP polygenic risk score (PRS) for breast cancer overall and by estrogen receptor (ER) status. Absolute risks of breast cancer by PRS were derived from relative risk estimates and UK incidence and mortality rates.Results:There was no strong evidence for departure from a multiplicative model for any SNP pair. Women in the highest 1% of the PRS had a three-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer compared with women in the middle quintile (odds ratio [OR] = 3.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.95 to 3.83). The ORs for ER-positive and ER-negative disease were 3.73 (95% CI = 3.24 to 4.30) and 2.80 (95% CI = 2.26 to 3.46), respectively. Lifetime risk of breast cancer for women in the lowest and highest quintiles of the PRS were 5.2% and 16.6% for a woman without family history, and 8.6% and 24.4% for a woman with a first-degree family history of breast cancer.Conclusions:The PRS stratifies breast cancer risk in women both with and without a family history of breast cancer. The observed level of risk discrimination could inform targeted screening and prevention strategies. Further discrimination may be achievable through combining the PRS with lifestyle/environmental factors, although these were not considered in this report.

We screened individuals from 443 familial breast cancer pedigrees and 521 controls for ATM sequence variants and identified 12 mutations in affected individuals and two in controls (P = 0.0047). The results demonstrate that ATM mutations that cause ataxia-telangiectasia in biallelic carriers are breast cancer susceptibility alleles in monoallelic carriers, with an estimated relative risk of 2.37 (95% confidence interval (c.i.) = 1.51-3.78, P = 0.0003). There was no evidence that other classes of ATM variant confer a risk of breast cancer.

Recently RAD51C mutations were identified in families with breast and ovarian cancer1. This observation prompted us to investigate the role of RAD51D in cancer susceptibility. We identified eight inactivating RAD51D mutations in unrelated individuals from 911 breast-ovarian cancer families compared with one in 1060 controls (P=0.01). The association was principally with ovarian cancer with three mutations identified in the 59 pedigrees with three or more ovarian cancer cases (P=0.0005). The relative risk of ovarian cancer for RAD51D mutation carriers was estimated to be 6.30 (95%CI: 2.86-13.85; P=4.8×10−6). By contrast, the relative risk of breast cancer was estimated to be 1.32 (95%CI: 0.59-2.96; P=0.50). These data indicate that RAD51D mutation testing may have clinical utility in individuals with ovarian cancer and their families. Moreover, we show that cells deficient in RAD51D are sensitive to treatment with a PARP inhibitor, suggesting a possible therapeutic approach for cancers arising in RAD51D mutation carriers.

The Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) has been established to conduct combined case-control analyses with augmented statistical power to try to confirm putative genetic associations with breast cancer. We genotyped nine SNPs for which there was some prior evidence of an association with breast cancer: CASP8 D302H (rs1045485), IGFBP3 -202 C --> A (rs2854744), SOD2 V16A (rs1799725), TGFB1 L10P (rs1982073), ATM S49C (rs1800054), ADH1B 3' UTR A --> G (rs1042026), CDKN1A S31R (rs1801270), ICAM5 V301I (rs1056538) and NUMA1 A794G (rs3750913). We included data from 9-15 studies, comprising 11,391-18,290 cases and 14,753-22,670 controls. We found evidence of an association with breast cancer for CASP8 D302H (with odds ratios (OR) of 0.89 (95% confidence interval (c.i.): 0.85-0.94) and 0.74 (95% c.i.: 0.62-0.87) for heterozygotes and rare homozygotes, respectively, compared with common homozygotes; P(trend) = 1.1 x 10(-7)) and weaker evidence for TGFB1 L10P (OR = 1.07 (95% c.i.: 1.02-1.13) and 1.16 (95% c.i.: 1.08-1.25), respectively; P(trend) = 2.8 x 10(-5)). These results demonstrate that common breast cancer susceptibility alleles with small effects on risk can be identified, given sufficiently powerful studies.

Copy number variants (CNVs) account for a major proportion of human genetic polymorphism and have been predicted to play an important role in genetic susceptibility to common disease. To address this we undertook a large direct genome-wide study of association between CNVs and eight common human diseases. Using a purpose-designed array we typed ~19,000 individuals into distinct copy-number classes at 3,432 polymorphic CNVs, including an estimated ~50% of all common CNVs larger than 500bp. We identified several biological artefacts that lead to false-positive associations, including systematic CNV differences between DNAs derived from blood and cell-lines. Association testing and follow-up replication analyses confirmed three loci where CNVs were associated with disease, IRGM for Crohn's disease, HLA for Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and type 1 diabetes, and TSPAN8 for type 2 diabetes, though in each case the locus had previously been identified in SNP-based studies, reflecting our observation that the majority of common CNVs which are well-typed on our array are well tagged by SNPs and so have been indirectly explored through SNP studies. We conclude that common CNVs which can be typed on existing platforms are unlikely to contribute greatly to the genetic basis of common human diseases.